Is sharing the contents of a review with the Provider you are reviewing divulging BCD information?

I would never advocate a woman responding to a review, negative or positive about her in coed. Like Sixx said, business's don't do it because its normally futile and doesn't look good.

Perfect Competition. It's an economic term. It requires a list of 8 qualifications making a market competitive, one of those being perfect information. It's considered the ideal, with perfect pricing, availability, and all the other good things economists look for. There are obviously some characteristics that the escorting market will never be able to obtain, but theoretically the closer we get the more fair the market structure will be. In a truly competitive (in the economic sense) market, women would price at the marginal cost.

However, I don't believe we offer a commodity, so that will never happen.

Damn. I knew being debate captain would come back to haunt me one of these days...

Sorry. I think sometimes the draw of the argument appeals me much more than the obtainable outcome.

Maddie, you're a fun girl.

I looked here https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ct_competition and saw this:

• Infinite buyers and sellers – Infinite consumers with the willingness and ability to buy the product at a certain price, and infinite producers with the willingness and ability to supply the product at a certain price.
• Zero entry and exit barriers – It is relatively easy for a business to enter or exit in a perfectly competitive market.
• Perfect factor mobility - In the long run factors of production are perfectly mobile allowing free long term adjustments to changing market conditions.
• Perfect information - Prices and quality of products are assumed to be known to all consumers and producers.[1]
• Zero transaction costs - Buyers and sellers incur no costs in making an exchange (perfect mobility).[1]
• Profit maximization - Firms aim to sell where marginal costs meet marginal revenue, where they generate the most profit.
• Homogeneous products – The characteristics of any given market good or service do not vary across suppliers.
• Constant returns to scale - Constant returns to scale ensure that there are sufficient firms in the industry.[2]

I have ill-informed half-baked opinions about relating these ideas to the hobby; I'd very strongly prefer to hear the opinions of someone who has taken an econ class in the last twenty years. Pretty please?

Damn. I knew being debate captain would come back to haunt me one of these days...

Sorry. I think sometimes the draw of the argument appeals me much more than the obtainable outcome. Originally Posted by MaddietheCoed

hmmm..... sometimes the draw of the person making the argument outweighs the issue itself?

I do want to find myself on the other side of the fence on a subject you find worth debating online someday though.....

For the time being your making some pretty valid points on the same side of the issue I find myself on.....

Yeah, but no matter what side of the argument, she's always going to be way, way hotter than you.

I have ill-informed half-baked opinions about relating these ideas to the hobby; I'd very strongly prefer to hear the opinions of someone who has taken an econ class in the last twenty years. Pretty please? Originally Posted by 78704

Why yes, I did take an econ class last year. I have a strong urge to brag about my grade in the class as well, but that would narrow me down to a tiny group and just be tacky.

The hobby could never be perfectly competitive, most importantly because it isn't a commodity product. That's why I offered the apology and made myself let go of my desire to be right. Having said I let it go, I just typed out a long response about all the reasons hobbying could not be competitive, but why it would benefit from becoming closer to it. For everyone else's sake I deleted it though.

Whispy,

I have made sure to stay away from any and all issues that I thought might attract your attention. I am more than willing to debate any topic, and I can even guarantee you I'll be right! Not online though.

Would you post it (or PM it to me) if I made fun of your spelling? ;-)

Hey, I tried pretty please first, right?

Ideally, if the primary goal is to collect honest critical "service" reviews I'd say this is obviously a bad practice and should be discouraged. Nearly any review writer will be influenced to some degree in their criticisms if they know they intend to send the review to a provider. In the most extreme case they will craft the review primarily considering her reaction (positive or negative) over trying to just tell it like it was.

But get real. "Discouragement" is about the limit of what can be done. You cannot enforce it, we're talking about a case where most of the time the writer's opinion of an experience is being shared with the provider before a review even exists. I don't even know what the "rule" would be? You cannot review a provider if you already have told her what you thought of the session? You're not allowed to use any language in a review that you have already shared with a provider?

As one who has very recently stirred up a shit storm (for which I deserved a great deal of ass kicking but didn't get nearly what I expected) I'll note that what I recommend is a) contact her if the review is really, really negative. Maybe something happened that made the session bad and 2) wait a few hours before you post, to let things settle down in your head. Remember the "count to 10" rule?

I'm not going to lie and say that an okay session was "over the moon" because she knows and that's not really fair to anybody.

Oh yeah, and if you had a crappy night when you worked an 11-7 and two patients puked on you, think three times before you rag on somebody. Except the idiot who ate three grease burgers after drinking way too damn many beers.