Do you realize that the day you retire that all of the reviews about you disappear? Several of the ladies I have been with that retired no longer show on ECCIE. Not even your handle appears in my reviews. I still think the number of reviews show them but the review and her name are gone. Originally Posted by tucsonNothing goes away on Internet.Doesn't matter if you're retired.All levels escorts paid services..
It's more beneficial for us guys to see reviews. And more than two or three. Reading a dozen or more, a pattern may develop that isn't listed on your ads or website:
Maybe she doesn't respond in a timely matter.
Maybe her incall wasn't "all that".
Maybe the parking was bad.
Maybe she included Activities in her ad, but you didn't get them.
You ladies provide a service, and when you visit a website that offers a service or product, often there will be a 5-star review section stating the food sucked, the hotel room was better than expected, the gadget was cheaply made, etc.
I think we ladies understand what it is you say, but here are the issues with ROS when comparing what the ladies offer:
1. It's an intimate service the ladies provide, not dinner
2. Perception of our services can only be compared to what the gent has experienced or even prefers as opposed to every other gent out there
3. One may believe he knows everything about ALL of us, but we are not a serving of food that should be consistant across the board to everyone that enjoys a certain dish
Example: The male who provides the site teaching gents how to negotiate, and makes claims that we ALL can be negotiated with or humiliated into it if we don't, has done the gents a disservice, IMO. It turns out, All gents are not cheap asshats wishing to insinuate a lady has less worth than what she posts, and ALL ladies do NOT negotiate.
4. Clients have been known to get details incorrect or maybe even embellishe them for whatever reason, which will set another gent up for disappointment concerning certain services.
I recently based my decision to see a Provider just because her pics looked great...she was hot. She didn't have any reviews but I went ahead...and it was a disaster. Never again without 3rd party info. Originally Posted by Prolongus
Yes, there is a connection.Very informative and enlightening.
Most of you guys who are on the boards, "hobbyists", are accustomed to "hobby culture"... writing reviews, sharing info, holding out certain expectations, etc.
But what many don't realize is there are many other subcultures that exist with paid companionship. There's a whole group/class of men who will never read or write a review, they gain a somewhat different benefit from our visits, and often add to the envelope rather than attempting to negotiate "best bang for the buck." So it's natural that many women would try to tap into this by raising donations and removing reviews.
Also, many women have experienced the negative side of hobby-culture to such a great extent that the term "hobbyist" is gaining a negative connotation for many of the ladies. Those ladies are seeking to separate themselves from both boards and reviews.
Others yet still, feel that reviews are incriminating. Originally Posted by Solitaire
I'm not a big fan of BCD reviews, because they are subjective. One gentleman does not enjoy the same as another. Originally Posted by MaxiMilyenVery true. Just because I had a great time with a particular lady doesn't mean everyone else will, and vice versa. It would benefit higher priced providers to have reviews since a lot of guys don't want to go in blind when dishing out a hefty donation. And what if a guy is very selective in who he sees. Such as a strong preference for sensual GFE's. Then he really needs the help of reviews to find what he's looking for.
... Most of you guys who are on the boards, "hobbyists", are accustomed to "hobby culture"... writing reviews, sharing info, holding out certain expectations, etc.I think this is very much on point. There is indeed a "hobby culture," and it has much in common with other cultures ... of the sort found in a Petri dish. Ugly, unpleasant, and unhealthy.
But what many don't realize is there are many other subcultures that exist with paid companionship. There's a whole group/class of men who will never read or write a review, they gain a somewhat different benefit from our visits, and often add to the envelope rather than attempting to negotiate "best bang for the buck." So it's natural that many women would try to tap into this by raising donations and removing reviews.
Also, many women have experienced the negative side of hobby-culture to such a great extent that the term "hobbyist" is gaining a negative connotation for many of the ladies. Those ladies are seeking to separate themselves from both boards and reviews. ... Originally Posted by Solitaire
I enjoy being on ECCIE, but how do escorts and their clients find each other "off the boards"? Originally Posted by PsychedelicDogMost of my dates come from Eros. I see a lot of new guys that have no clue about any of the review boards. Then some of my dates will will look at the public portion of my reviews. They aren't members of any of the boards.
The difference between newer, or not yet established ladies and reputable providers who have a history of providing stellar services over a period of time and in a consistant manner, is always something worth considering. So, yes, the gents need to understand the differences, just as the ladies need to understand the types of clients she wishes to market to and meet with.Max, where does a Provider's history of stellar service come from? Her ads? Showcase? Who decides the service is stellar? A Provider that has been doing this for a number of years has the experience a new girl won't have but does that translate in to better service? Lots of clients don't see newbies for this reason: they don't have a history from others telling us what she is like. They want intel on her: posts, reviews, etc. before deciding to see her.
Everything about each party should be considered when making a date, if someone wishes to have an experience that better suits their needs. ROS is fine, but there are showcases, websites, forums, etc....to be considered as well. Originally Posted by MaxiMilyen
Max, where does a Provider's history of stellar service come from? Her ads? Showcase? Who decides the service is stellar? A Provider that has been doing this for a number of years has the experience a new girl won't have but does that translate in to better service? Lots of clients don't see newbies for this reason: they don't have a history from others telling us what she is like. They want intel on her: posts, reviews, etc. before deciding to see her.Sure, I agree. That one little box...do you like like me, check yes or no. LOL No need for ROS, because zero percent of the population perceives exactly the same as the rest of the population, 100% of the time. Too many factors for any individual in order for that to be untrue.
To me, it is the combo of your advertising and our reviews that makes me decide to see you. The two work together. Originally Posted by Prolongus
What I find is that the gentleman that can afford $400-$500 pr hr generally do not even bother looking at reviews, but for some reason guys paying $300 pr hr really prefer having reviews - go figure lol. I do have TER reviews (I have tried to get reviews put on this site in the past from 2 different guys but for some reason in each instance they didn't go thru which is weird lol), because sometimes I get business from them but if I took down my TER profile, it would not affect my business. If you have a more open website where you are interacting with men (via comments or even a chat box), they feel very comfortable with you and get to know you better and develop more trust. Also cops are not going to have a website so there is reassurance the lady is not a cop lol.
If a lady has an extensive website like I do with videos, blog posts and even a trust guarantee, most men do not need reviews to feel comfortable. I mean this is what I have discovered when I ask my clients how they found me, they rarely say from a review.
If more ladies did videos and even blogs and twitter feeds, they could bypass reviews - which can sometimes in my opinon be a little too revealing about what is going on and most guys prefer privacy, esp the wealthier ones. Videos unlike pictures cannot be photoshopped and that is why ladies with videos get more business than ladies without. Plus in videos you can talk and they can hear your voice
The other day I was making my green smoothie and I pulled out my cell and recorded a quick video of what I was putting in it and put it on my website. It was really fun and guys love personal interaction like this and you don't really need reviews when you do this.
Any provider can pull out her cell and record a quick: "hey how are you sexy - would love to see you" and it would show how she looks and sounds and give the guy more confidence that there will be no bait and switch (really big in this industry unfortunately)
There is so much you can do in videos that you cannot do in pictures. I was even at the gym a week ago and had a guy do a quick video of me working out and put it on my twitter feed. Again it was fun, easy and guys could see me working out lol Originally Posted by stephania ricci