OUR CLUELESS PRESIDENT.....RUSHES TO THE DEFENSE OF ISLAM

A problem that has been occurring is when a group of people are committing atrocities in the name of a religion to justify their behavior the members of the specific religion, the religious leaders and the followers opposed to the use of their religion to justify the atrocities, should be expected to isolate those in their congregations or those who clothe themselves with the "protection" of the religion, e.g. attending services and recruiting from the congregations, and put them into the hands of those who those animals are slaughtering and mutilating.

When the rank and file of the religion fail to do so, they are in effect "protecting" them.

Rather than wasting time of slicing the bologna thin between blaming a religion for the atrocities and focusing on those who are orchestrating and implementing the atrocities the energy should be spent on digging out the bad guys and ending their reign of terror.

The "freedom of religion" argument doesn't even belong in the discussion, unless one is simply trying to rationalize one's desire to avoid sanitizing the Earth of a spreading cancer, because it is a dirty business. All the "religious freedom" argument does is indirectly legitimize a group of animals who are "animals" from the perspective of the Western culture ...

... the world is outraged by nonlethal waterboarding, but is almost silent to burning alive.

A problem that has been occurring is when a group of people are committing atrocities in the name of a religion to justify their behavior the members of the specific religion, the religious leaders and the followers opposed to the use of their religion to justify the atrocities, should be expected to isolate those in their congregations or those who clothe themselves with the "protection" of the religion, e.g. attending services and recruiting from the congregations, and put them into the hands of those who those animals are slaughtering and mutilating.

When the rank and file of the religion fail to do so, they are in effect "protecting" them.

Rather than wasting time of slicing the bologna thin between blaming a religion for the atrocities and focusing on those who are orchestrating and implementing the atrocities the energy should be spent on digging out the bad guys and ending their reign of terror.

The "freedom of religion" argument doesn't even belong in the discussion, unless one is simply trying to rationalize one's desire to avoid sanitizing the Earth of a spreading cancer, because it is a dirty business. All the "religious freedom" argument does is indirectly legitimize a group of animals who are "animals" from the perspective of the Western culture ...

... the world is outraged by nonlethal waterboarding, but is almost silent to burning alive. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Are you saying muslims as a whole are protecting ISIS? Did you not see the outrage by muslims of the burning of the Jordanian pilot? There were muslims in Jordan calling for a Jihad against ISIS and volunteering to go and fight ISIS.

Again, Obama, Valerie and the other top Dems have decided to kowtow to the Muslims in an attempt to win their vote. It's that simple. You will not hear any political rhetoric tying terrorist activities to Islam no matter how obvious. It's a long term political strategy. If it brings down the country, so be it. Originally Posted by gnadfly

You are right.
It's been six very long years yet still this POS is campaigning !

I wonder how Obama and his administration is going to walk back the "Islam angle" if ISIS executes the American woman hostage. That is, if she hasn't already been executed. The Press has been very compliant on not releasing her name or details on how she became a prisoner.

This goes along with my other assertion that Obama released the field generals on "the War on Women" when he released those Taliban commanders.

Are you saying muslims as a whole are protecting ISIS? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

No. But I can understand NOW why you cannot answer simple questions.

....if ISIS executes the American woman hostage. That is, if she hasn't already been executed. .... Originally Posted by gnadfly

The sad probability is that if she hasn't been, she probably wishes she were.

I seem to recall a female service member who was captured in Iraq after she made a wrong turn in a supply vehicle. If I recall correctly she was extricated after a passage of time by some good men dispatched for that task.

This administration will want this one's story to be untold.

Again, Obama, Valerie and the other top Dems have decided to kowtow to the Muslims in an attempt to win their vote. It's that simple. You will not hear any political rhetoric tying terrorist activities to Islam no matter how obvious. It's a long term political strategy. If it brings down the country, so be it. Originally Posted by gnadfly

How ridiculous and illogical that argument is, gonad!

How many Muslim votes are out there for Obama or any American presidential candidate? Enough to influence an election? Nope. Do American Muslims typically vote as a block? Nope. Do American Muslims typically bankroll elections? Nope.

Your argument is a stretch. Please corroborate your points with something other than an "Amen" from the idiot Cornholio, because right now that's all you have.

How ridiculous and illogical that argument is, gonad!
.
Your argument is a stretch. Please corroborate your points with something other than an "Amen" from the idiot Cornholio, because right now that's all you have. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yssups admits :