JD's busted.................
For the umpteenth time!
Your reseach abilities are lacking as usual. There is this website called Google. You use it to search for things.Nice disclaimer. Do they have a code for Okool-aid intoxication in Okool-aid care?
If you type in "$20000" and "obamacare", you find the link you posted as well as most of of the fringe "news" sites.
But wait. The 4th result down. Factcheck.org. They list all of their sources. Let's check what they say.
And that's where you fail. That's where you are exposed as a blinder wearing, bullshit slinging douche-bag who frequently lies in his posts.
Everyone knows who you are and what you kneel for. Whirly, sog, and the late Uncle hanjob accepted you into their misinformation circle of mistrust. Because they, like the klan and the nra, will accept anyone who is willing to parrot.
I guess if you had to really dig for the info, you would only be lazy. But you ignore a reasonable source. In this case, because the information is readily available, you are lying by omission.
You should stick to opinion. Because no opinion is wrong or a lie. Unless of cource you try to sneak one of your "facts" in.
Q: Did the IRS say that the cheapest health insurance plan under the federal health care law would cost $20,000 per family?
A: No. The IRS used $20,000 in a hypothetical example to illustrate how it will calculate the tax penalty for a family that fails to obtain health coverage as required by law. Treasury says the figure is not an estimate of premiums.
In the same article.
The Kaiser Family Foundation has developed a Health Reform Subsidy Calculator, which allows people to get a sense of who might be eligible for premium support from the government, and how much the subsidy might be. (It is just an illustration, though, and not meant to suggest that this is exactly what people will pay or receive in subsidies.) Assuming a medium-range regional cost factor, the premium for a 50-year-old policyholder in a family of four, with a household income of $92,200 could be $16,858, according to the subsidy calculator. But that family might also qualify for an $8,099 subsidy, leaving them to pay $8,759. That estimate is close to the average subsidy of $8,290 that CBO projects exchange participants would receive in 2023
http://www.factcheck.org/2013/03/oba...0000-a-family/ Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
Now that number has more than doubled and 30 million people still won't have coverage. Why don't you scream about those numbers?Do you have a link? If Romneycare can work in Mass, then the ACA can work in other states. They both have the same mandate, you are required to purchase health insurance or pay a fine ( or pay a tax as Chief Justice Roberts calls it).
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Do you know why it "worked" in Massachusetts? Because they could fall back on federal funds to make up any short fall. You don't have that for Obamacare. Who are you going to go to? The UN?It's true that the Federal Gov. sends the state of Mass a monthly check to help them administer Romney Care. The Federal Gov. is also spending a Trillion dollars for Obamacare. Romney Care is a state plan passed by the Mass. State Legislature. If any other state wants a plan like Romney Care, their state legislature would have to pass the bill and their governor sign it into law. Each state can Opt out of Obamacare if it wants to, the default is your state is in unless you opt out. New York and California are in and have already begun setting up the government insurance exchanges. So if you don't have health insurance, just don't get sick until 1/1/2014. If you are 26 or less then get on your parents plan right now(even if you have a pre-existing condition).
And if it worked so well in Massachusetts then why not do it in every state independently and screw Obamacare? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Nice disclaimer. Do they have a code for Okool-aid intoxication in Okool-aid care? Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDBYou see the exposure of a liar is in some way a kool-aid event.