0zombie tries to kill DJT

For an extra thousand can I put a Liberal in the car for local color, lol.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

That would be a big hit, I imagine.

That would be a big hit, I imagine. Originally Posted by DSK

Yes, it would be. It wouldn't take much to get them in there either. Just announce there is an EBT card worth about a thousand bucks hidden inside, lol. When the surviving families bitch that you lied to them, just tell them so does your Government but you never question them. The gullible fucking Libs, lol.


Jim

that brit is unbelievably stupid.

he was prolly too stupid to get a blackmarket gun.

that brit is unbelievably stupid.

he was prolly too stupid to get a blackmarket gun. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

I call them boys, 0zombies

You lost - stop posting. Originally Posted by DSK

A loony and a dipshit.

Dying for someone to make a bet as stupid as the one you lost, aren't you, JL?

Of course it really doesn't matter. Everybody knows you're the biggest welsher in ECCIE history.

There was no "bet" here. And I'll bet you can't find one...

Loony.

Media Ignores British Citizen Assassination Attempt of Donald Trump in Las Vegas Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

It's a bona fide CNN story Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Which is it? Ignored? Covered? Or just something for you two to gripe about?

The liberal media won't saturate that on the air waves for a week straight, hell no. We won't learn nearly as much about this little bastard as we did about Omar Mateen.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

One kills 49.

The other ineptly doesn't even get a shot off.

Of course you will hear more about one than the other.

Which is it? Ignored? Covered? Or just something for you two to gripe about? Originally Posted by Old-T

Go screw yourself with a splintered broom handle, Old-THUMPER.

Why isn’t the assassination attempt on Donald Trump bigger news?

By Callum Borchers June 21 at 1:53 PM

The No. 1 trending question related to Donald Trump on Google right now is "Who tried to shoot Trump?" Which means a lot of people don't know the answer. Which is probably because the assassination attempt on the presumptive Republican presidential nominee hasn't been covered as a major news story.

The answer, authorities say, is Michael Steven Sandford, a 20-year-old British citizen who was in the United States illegally after overstaying his visa. (WaPo)

Go screw yourself with a splintered broom handle, Old-THUMPER. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I really don't think there is anyone on here who is quite so eloquent as you are. Of course the substance is a little lacking--but from you, not unexpected.

I politely point out that you and IIFFy, two posters who are so often in lock-mind about most topics, contradicted each other this time.

Then you, in typical IBMeltdown style, melted down, flung insults, and completely avoided the issue.

As I said, absolutely no shock that you replied that way. Your only reaction to everything you disagree with is to rant and insult. You are genetically incapable of having a civil conversation unless the other person grovels at your feet in agreement. Sometimes even that is not enough to get you to be civil.

And you wonder why I cut you less slack than anyone else on here. It is because you have earned it.

I really don't think there is anyone on here who is quite so eloquent as you are. Of course the substance is a little lacking--but from you, not unexpected.

I politely point out that you and IIFFy, two posters who are so often in lock-mind about most topics, contradicted each other this time.

Then you, in typical IBMeltdown style, melted down, flung insults, and completely avoided the issue.

As I said, absolutely no shock that you replied that way. Your only reaction to everything you disagree with is to rant and insult. You are genetically incapable of having a civil conversation unless the other person grovels at your feet in agreement. Sometimes even that is not enough to get you to be civil.

And you wonder why I cut you less slack than anyone else on here. It is because you have earned it. Originally Posted by Old-T

Old-Trollop, I know who/what you are and how you will play it...


Old-Trollop





While you are at it Old-Trollop, read---> https://theconservativetreehouse.com...m/#more-117831

I really don't think there is anyone on here who is quite so eloquent as you are. Of course the substance is a little lacking--but from you, not unexpected.

I politely point out that you and IIFFy, two posters who are so often in lock-mind about most topics, contradicted each other this time.

Then you, in typical IBMeltdown style, melted down, flung insults, and completely avoided the issue.

As I said, absolutely no shock that you replied that way. Your only reaction to everything you disagree with is to rant and insult. You are genetically incapable of having a civil conversation unless the other person grovels at your feet in agreement. Sometimes even that is not enough to get you to be civil.

And you wonder why I cut you less slack than anyone else on here. It is because you have earned it. Originally Posted by Old-T

You're a stupid ass liar, Old-THUMPER. One of your degenerate butt buddies denied the veracity of the story altogether, Old-THUMPER, and the CNN link repudiated that stupid-ass notion.

You're a stupid ass liar, Old-THUMPER. One of your degenerate butt buddies denied the veracity of the story altogether, Old-THUMPER, and the CNN link repudiated that stupid-ass notion. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Poor stupid IB. No, I am not a liar just because you don't agree with a third person. For someone who professes to be literate, you say some amazingly stupid things.

Poor stupid IB. No, I am not a liar just because you don't agree with a third person. For someone who professes to be literate, you say some amazingly stupid things.

Originally Posted by Old-T

You'd be the liar trying to distort the OP which is substantiated by the WaPo article, Old-THUMPER.

I didn't distort anything about the article. I just pointed out that you and IIFFy
grossly contracted each other. Are you really too stupid to know the difference?

I guess you are.

I didn't distort anything about the article. I just pointed out that you and IIFFy
grossly contracted each other. Are you really too stupid to know the difference?

I guess you are. Originally Posted by Old-T

The only thing grossly contradictory, Old-THUMPER, is your fantasized IQ versus your actual IQ. The WaPo article makes it abundantly clear that this story has been all but ignored by the lame-stream media contradicting your lame-ass POV, Old-THUMPER.