CT - why not try to stick to the isue at hand - 'DPST SC packinig to gain an advantage politically - and change the system ( which you say needs changes) - to a Oneparty marxist totalitrian state.
enough denial and deflection.
What changes - specifically - and to what end -CT?????
What will it be - 13, 19, 29 56 SC judges - How many liberal radical legislators from the bend does 'teh' DPST party need???
Answer - enough judges to assure DPST dominance and liberal interpretation of 'teh' Law - forever!
And all in the name of RBG - whose 'dying wish' is a liberal myth - and who opposed SC packing.