The American Communist thread

Howler monkeys unite.

Your retarded buddy needs a hand up.

Fucking retards.......... Originally Posted by i'va biggen

says the 3rd grader who cannot spell or write a complete sentence

says the 3rd grader who cannot spell or write a complete sentence Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

Post fucking retards, and no stones the hillbilly is the first to answer.........LMFAO

83 billion taxpayer dollars every month for five years going into the stock market because of QE. I hope that the stock market will go up or that the laws of economic no longer apply but....when it stops, what happens? How much did it cost every man, woman, and child to help the Wall Street types to make billions of dollars? We know that you favor a communist system but this is income transfer in reverse of the communist cause. The rich are getting richer because Obama is taking from the poor and middle class.


FYI, that is almost a 5 trillion dollar transfer to the rich from the rest of us. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

JD, the federal government did not transfer 5 trillion dollars directly into the Stock market, you idiot. You were corrected on this once before back in March by Lustylad and you keep saying the same thing. Why don't you go enroll in a Finance class before you type in your lies in the ECCIE Political Forum. From the link.


Just for the record, the Federal Reserve ended QE entirely late last year. The program's positive effect on the stock market was much more indirect than you suggest. It wasn't Obama "transferring $85 billion a month... from the taxpayers to the stock market." It was the Fed buying long-term Treasuries and MBS, reducing the amount of those securities held by the private sector and increasing excess bank reserves on deposit with the Fed. While there are plenty of reasons criticize QE, it wasn't an Obama program and it didn't add to our taxes or debt. It was monetary policy, not fiscal policy.



http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...onetary&page=2

HERE ARE JUST A FEW OF OBAMA'S
COMMUNIST, EXTREMIST CZARS AND SOCIALIST APPOINTEES
WHO ARE CONVERTING AMERICA TO COMMUNISM

http://www.commieblaster.com/socialist_czars/




.

Obama’s Father was a communist or socialist

Obama’s mother was a communist or socialist

Obama’s grandparents were socialist

Obama’s friend Bill Ayers is a communist

Obama’s childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis was a communist

Obama’s friend Bernadine Dohrn is a communist

Obama taught the organizing principles of communist Saul Alinsky

Obama actively sought out Marxist and communist professors in college

Obama told Joe the Plumber that it is a good thing to spread the wealth around (a socialist principle)

Obama’s cousin Raila Odinga was a Muslim extremist who sought Sharia for Kenya

Obama’s former Green Czar, Van Jones, is an admitted communist

Obama’s former White House communications director Anita Dunn said Mao Tse Tung (communist) was one of her two favorite political philosophers.

Obama’s friend Rashid Khalidi is a supporter of Palestinian terrorist

Obama’s White House Christmas tree carried a communist ornament featuring Communist dictator Mao Tse Tung

Obama was a member of the New Party, a socialist party founded in Chicago

Obama was supported in 2008 and is supported in 2012 by the Socialist Party of America

Obama was supported in 2008 and is supported in 2012 by the Communist Party USA

Obama has installed numerous members or sympathizers of the Muslim Brotherhood into his Administration

Obama’s policies since taking office mirror the steps taken by socialist, communist or Marxist leaders ( take over of a nation’s economy by the centralized government)

Obama has several members of his staff and cabinet with socialist or communist connections in either subscribing to communist principles or supporting known communist or radical organizations.

Carol M. Browner, White House Energy/Climate czar, was a member of the Commission for a Sustainable World Society (SWS) at Socialist International (SI).

Cass Sunstein, President Obama’s regulatory czar, openly promotes a socialist “bill of rights,” supports the abolition of marriage as a legal institution, and advocates a “New Deal Fairness Doctrine” to regulate the news media.

Obama’s friend Professor Derrick Bell was a racist and promoter of racial strife.

Obama supporter Carl Davidson was a former leader of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and a Maoist.

Obama Campaign supporter, Sam Graham-Felsen — Socialist/Communist, ran the Obama’s 2008 campaign’s blog. He spent time in France taking part in labor riots, has written for a socialist magazine, hung a communist flag in his home, and was a fan of Marx while at Harvard.

Obama associate Mike Klonsky is an unabashed communist whose current mission is to spread Marxist ideology in the American classroom. Obama funded him to the tune of nearly $2 million. Obama, moreover, gave Klonsky a broad platform to broadcast his ideas: a “social justice” blog on the official Obama campaign website

Obama Associate Alice Palmer. In 1995, Alice Palmer represented the state’s 13th District, and decided to run for the United States Congress. She hand-picked Barack Obama to run to replace her. She was an executive board member of the U.S. Peace Council, which the FBI identified as a communist front group, an affiliate of the World Peace Council, a Soviet front group.

- See more at: http://blackquillandink.com/?p=12081....wAf5hODq.dpuf

You were a orphan whirrly, right?

JD, the federal government did not transfer 5 trillion dollars directly into the Stock market, you idiot. You were corrected on this once before back in March by Lustylad and you keep saying the same thing. Why don't you go enroll in a Finance class before you type in your lies in the ECCIE Political Forum. From the link.


Just for the record, the Federal Reserve ended QE entirely late last year. The program's positive effect on the stock market was much more indirect than you suggest. It wasn't Obama "transferring $85 billion a month... from the taxpayers to the stock market." It was the Fed buying long-term Treasuries and MBS, reducing the amount of those securities held by the private sector and increasing excess bank reserves on deposit with the Fed. While there are plenty of reasons criticize QE, it wasn't an Obama program and it didn't add to our taxes or debt. It was monetary policy, not fiscal policy.



http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...onetary&page=2 Originally Posted by flghtr65

That Fed money needs to keep flowing forever, it prevents higher taxes, and gooses the economy...for now.

Under Bush the percentage of total wealth owned by the top 400 families went from 25% to 50% and no one seems to think that was a bad thing.

That Fed money needs to keep flowing forever, it prevents higher taxes, and gooses the economy...for now. Originally Posted by DSK

The day is coming when people will lose faith in our fiat currency. The coming crash, thanks to the FED's money "management" will be of biblical proportions.

RACHEL DOLEZAL'S REAL LIFE STORY VS. OBAMA'S REAL LIFE STORY

June 30, 2015 Lloyd Billingsley

​​In June, a reporter from KXLY in Spokane, Washington, asked Rachel Dolezal, president of the Spokane chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, if she was an African American, as she claimed. Dolezal said she didn’t understand and walked away, but national media jumped on the story. Then Dolezal’s parents came forward with the truth. Their daughter Rachel was in fact a person of no color, a white woman. In short order, Rachel Dolezal stepped down from her presidential NAACP post but her case raises questions about a more powerful president.

From the start, multiple mysteries swarmed about Barack Obama, but the old-line establishment media essentially walked away from the tough questions. Barack Obama was elected president though voters knew less about him than any presidential candidate in history. Now, as his second term winds down, the evidence is mounting that the president, like Rachel Dolezal, could be something other than what he claims to be. This centers on his relation to Frank Marshall Davis, an old-line Stalinist.

The 1995 Dreams From My Father devotes 2500 words to someone the author calls only “Frank.” Not once does the full name appear, and in The Audacity of Hope (2006) even “Frank” fails to show up. In The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor (2012), Paul Kengor made a strong case that the slavishly pro-Soviet Davis was Obama’s ideological father. The old-line establishment media generally ignored the book, but it duly cropped up again this year.

On March 23, 2015, Washington Post fact checker Michelle Hee Lee authored a piece headlined, “Frank Marshall Davis: Obama’s ‘Communist Mentor?” The fact checker described Davis as a man who “wanted African Americans to have constitutional rights.” He was “associated with the Communist Party” and the FBI said he was a member, but the fact checker found no evidence Davis was a “hard-core Communist who spied for Soviet leaders.” And she found no evidence that Davis remained a “close Communist mentor” who advised Obama “throughout his life.” Hee Lee gave this lingering “assertion” three Pinocchios, a remarkable case of denial.

Also in 2012, Joel Gilbert’s film Dreams From My Real Father, made a case that Frank Marshall Davis was Obama’s biological father. The film charts the many physical similarities between the men and chronicles the relationship between Davis and Obama’s mother Ann Dunham. Gilbert also finds a striking resemblance between Davis’ children Lynn and Mark and the current president of the United States. The film also cites evidence that the president has faked photos and had plastic surgery to hide his resemblance to Davis.

“When Barackobama.com attacked my film,” Gilbert explains, “they went out of their way to condemn me, while never denying that Davis was Obama’s father, nor addressing the premise of the film.” But Gilbert got some confirmation in a different way. In September of 2012, he received an email from Obama’s deputy campaign manager Julianna Smoot offering voters a chance to win a dinner with the president. “You can learn a lot,” Smoot wrote. “His dad taught him to love jazz. . .”

Gilbert was familiar with Obama’s official story line, that he was with the Kenyan Barack Obama only a single time in the early 1970s, for a week or ten days. The Kenyan knew little or nothing about jazz and there was never an opportunity for him to teach anybody. But Frank Marshall Davis, who raised Obama, was indeed a jazz devotee.

As far as Gilbert knows, nobody has ever asked the president about Davis in any way, but alleged relatives have some thoughts on the subject. In an April 10, 2015 interview Gilbert asked Malik Obama, supposedly the president’s half brother, “Do you think that Barack looks like Frank Marshall Davis – this is a man that he said raised him – more than your father?”



“There’s a great resemblance,” Malik Obama said. “ I think Frank Marshall Davis and Barack, they look alike. Some kind of moles I see on his face and Frank, he has those too. There’s a resemblance.”

“Well,” countered Gilbert, “would you like to see or do a DNA test one day to know for sure?”

“That would really prove whether we are related or not,” Malik said. “Yes. I would be willing to do that. I don’t know how I’d deal with it, if it really came out that he really is a fraud or a con.”

“It might be the reason why he made such a big deal about you politically,” Gilbert said, “but personally he doesn’t feel the bond.”

“I’m agreeing,” Malik Obama said. “Yeah, I agree with that because it’s hard to understand how somebody can make such an about turn and make a big play about where he comes from and then once he gets what he gets, wants nothing to do with that place anymore.”

Malik Obama understands that the President of the United States, the most powerful man in the world, could be “a fraud and a con.” The Dolezal case can help solve this mystery.

Like Dolezal’s parents, those in the know should come forward with full documentation. The old-line establishment media should not walk away but cover the story, just as they did with Rachel. The president and his handlers are not likely to cooperate, but the sooner or later the story will gain widespread traction. Many people will not know how to deal with it.

Why post a link? It's ShiEaters favorite site!




.

Olapdog media fuckers...


JOURNALISTIC TREACHERY
A new report's chilling findings on the extent of Soviet spies in the American press.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2593...-matthew-vadum

More American journalists were involved in spying for the Soviet Union than was previously believed, according to new research published in the Journal of Slavic Military Studies.

Traditionally, research has focused on the role that U.S. reporters played as messengers, recruiters, and sources of information (and disinformation), but some of those "journalist spies also collected a large amount of secret diplomatic and military information" from 1941 through 1946 as World War II gave way to the Cold War, writes Alexander G. Lovelace of Ohio University. The article, published this month, is "Spies in the News: Soviet Espionage in the American Media During World War II and the Beginning of the Cold War."

Throughout the life of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics only a tiny fraction of all U.S. journalists joined the Soviet espionage network. Quantifying the harm done is difficult but the information they transmitted to their handlers undoubtedly inflicted damage on both the U.S. and its allies during World War II and the Cold War. Some of these American journalists had access to the highest echelons of the U.S. government and provided the Soviets information of great value to America's enemies.

Lovelace writes that there were 22 journalists active as "[a]gents in the USA" in June 1941, according to a Soviet intelligence officer. The academic notes that "taken by profession, journalists provided the highest numbers of spies second only to engineers." After 1941 the number of American reporters spying for the Soviets grew.

From its unholy birth, the U.S.S.R. used journalists across the world as spies. Czarist-era publisher Aleksei Frolovich visited Finland in 1918 posing as a bona fide journalist. In the 1930s the KGB recruited syndicated columnist Robert Allen and John Spivak of The Call, the newspaper of the American Socialist Party. American journalists weren't merely "auxiliary for other communist groups," he writes. There is "an abundance of evidence that journalists contributed a great deal of secret information to the Soviets, which grew more important as World War II chilled into the Cold War." But much of the information procured by spies "between 1943 and 1945 was highly sensitive to the US war effort," Lovelace writes.

It should be noted that the relationship between the U.S. government and the press was different in those days. "Groups of reporters were routinely trusted with secret information to be used as 'background' for stories," according to Lovelace. Journalists of the day never reported on President Franklin Roosevelt's paralysis that he had suffered years earlier as a result of contracting polio. The KGB was well aware of this cozy relationship and took advantage of American reporters.

The KGB used journalists because they were able to meet many people in different fields and could ask probing questions without sparking suspicion. In a 1941 report the KGB noted that many of its journalist spies were "highly developed intellectually and occupied high social positions." They not only attended college in the 1920s and 30s when few Americans did, but they were accepted into the best universities. This allowed these eventual KGB recruits to mingle with fellow students who would go on to occupy senior posts in government with access to sought-after information.

Time magazine was a hotbed of spies and pro-Soviet activity. American journalist Whittaker Chambers, an editor there, was a Soviet spy who courageously switched sides. His complaints about the publication's pro-Soviet bias caused tension. KGB agent John Scott, another Time editor, tried to get him fired. The magazine's Stephen Laird spied on other journalists in Europe, Lovelace writes.

Time's Richard Lauterbach pleased the Soviets when he portrayed the 1940 Katyn massacre as a German atrocity. In fact the Soviet secret police murdered the more than 20,000 captured Polish officers whose remains were unearthed in 1944. Chambers was proud to have successfully blocked some of Lauterbach's articles.

A month before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, Time's Laird reported to his Soviet handlers that U.S. diplomats were hostile to the Soviet Union. A KGB report indicated that these American officials believed that "support for the USSR in its war with Germany lays the groundwork for the 'spread of Bolshevism throughout the world.'"

Also before Pearl Harbor, the Soviets asked their American journalist spies to gather information on influential isolationist Charles Lindbergh, Nazi-sympathizing Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy Sr., and former President Herbert Hoover.

Around this time Harry Truman was a U.S. senator. He wanted to hurt both totalitarian powers, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. When the Third Reich invaded Russia in 1941, he offered realpolitik counsel, proposing that the United States give aid to whatever side was losing and "that way let them kill as many [of each other] as possible."

The Soviets were extremely anxious to ascertain if Truman's views had changed when he assumed the presidency in 1945. They proposed that Nation columnist I.F. Stone and the legendary Walter Lippmann and others "focus on covering the principal newspaper syndicates and the financial-political groups that are behind them; their relationships with Truman, the pressure exerted on him, etc."

While the KGB might in theory have had a shot at recruiting Lippmann earlier in his life when he flirted with socialism, by the 1930s he had renounced socialism, so the Soviets went around him. Mary Price, his secretary, was a spy for the Communists.

Lippmann and other patriotic journalists innocently passed on plenty of strategic information to the U.S.S.R. by talking with fellow reporters aligned with the KGB. The Soviets learned through their espionage that in May 1944, the month before the D-Day invasion of Normandy, that British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Roosevelt were fighting over "questions on the future of Germany" and the participation of the United Kingdom. Other reporters who were close to Roosevelt, such as Thomas Reynolds of the Chicago Sun, also unknowingly leaked information on the planned occupation of Germany to Soviet agents.

New York Herald-Tribune reporter Peter Rhodes and Brooklyn Daily Eagle reporter Winston Burdett were vital to the Soviet espionage program. Working for CBS, Burdett covered the war in Finland, Yugoslavia, and Turkey for the KGB. The KGB correctly described Rhodes as "a pretty good find for us." While a spy for the U.S.S.R., his day job involved supplying intelligence to President Roosevelt and FBI director J. Edgar Hoover.

Through his contacts, Amerasia editor Joseph Milton Bernstein, code name Marquis, got his hands on documents that he passed to the GRU, the Soviet military intelligence agency. These papers detailed U.S. troop movements to China, a Chinese embassy report on trade, estimated German troop strength on the Eastern Front, and an economic analysis regarding Vladivostok.



Bernstein also handed over details of American policy debates on British India, U.S. military planning information, and estimates of troop strength for the Chinese Nationalists and the Japanese. He let the Soviets know that there was "increasing resistance to fulfilling [lend-lease] shipments for the USSR" and the government of China.

Members of Bernstein's spy ring included journalist T.A. Bisson, Amerasia founder Philip Jaffe, and two of his staff librarians. After the magazine published classified information, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) surreptitiously broke into its offices and found "hundreds" of secret documents from the U.S. government. (The wartime intelligence agency OSS was forerunner to the Central Intelligence Agency.)

The Bernstein case "represents the greatest example of reporters working for Soviet intelligence, stealing diplomatic and military secrets during World War 2."

It has long been known that some American journalists, such as socialist true-believer John S. Reed, functioned more as agents of Soviet disinformation or agents of influence than as actual spies. Reed's eyewitness account of the Bolshevik takeover, Ten Days That Shook The World, helped to boost the image of the new Soviet state, at least in the eyes of leftists. Reed, whom the Soviets honored by interring his body in the Kremlin Wall Necropolis, was also the inspiration for the 1981 movie Reds. His American wife, Louise Bryant, another fellow-traveling journalist, toured the U.S. to promote the Bolsheviks and to discourage the U.S. from intervening militarily in the civil war in Russia that roughly coincided with the so-called October Revolution.

Then there was the case of New York Times reporter Walter Duranty. Duranty filed dishonest news accounts about the U.S.S.R. in order to safeguard the Bolshevik revolution. When Joseph Stalin engineered a devastating famine in the 1930s to wipe out perceived political enemies, Duranty effectively became his publicist. As millions died, Stalin was dismissive, referring to the famine as "one of the minor inconveniences of our system."

Around that time Duranty was similarly callous in a conversation with another Western reporter, saying he didn't plan to write about the famine and its consequences. "What are a few million dead Russians in a situation like this? Quite unimportant."

Duranty knew about the horrifying atrocities in progress but in March 1933 he reported, "There is no actual starvation or deaths from starvation." Months later he added, "Any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda.” Duranty, whom Stalin personally thanked for his so-called reporting, won a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting in 1932. It has never been rescinded.

American journalists have leaned left for a long time. Today they pump out news stories that make America's enemies look good and often their coverage of U.S. conduct during wars seems calculated to hurt the U.S. war effort.

This treachery by the Fourth Estate is nothing new. Americans have seen it stretching back to the Tet offensive in the Vietnam War when Walter Cronkite inexplicably concluded that the war was lost, to the media's vicious piling-on of General David Petraeus after MoveOn labelled him "General Betray-Us," to the media's barely restrained delight at the top-secret document dumps involving Julian Assange, Bradley Manning, and Edward Snowden.

What's new is the mainstreaming of this journalistic malfeasance.

The New York Times is the worst offender. The Old Gray Lady threw national security concerns by the wayside in 1971 when it published the Pentagon papers, a secret history of the Vietnam War produced by the Department of Defense.

The Times is particularly enthusiastic about sabotaging the Global War on Terror.

In 2005 the newspaper reported on the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program after the White House asked it not to report on the program. The administration argued, in the words of the newspaper's report, that publication "could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny."

In 2006 the New York Times, along with the Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal shared the details of President Bush's Terrorist Finance Tracking Program. The House of Representatives passed a resolution condemning the revelation. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) called the reporters involved "co-conspirators with the leakers," and added that should another terror attack take place, "the blood will be on their hands."

In 2005 the Washington Post reported on the Central Intelligence Agency's secret detention facilities for terrorists in Egypt, Jordan, and Morocco. The so-called black sites were created to allow U.S. personnel to interrogate terrorists more aggressively than they could have done stateside. The leak was condemned loudly in the nation's capital.

Although these U.S. journalists may not be consciously collaborating with hostile nations or terrorist organizations, their unfair, borderline seditious coverage is no doubt putting Americans in jeopardy, just as it did when a small number of influential journalists were on the payroll of the U.S.S.R.