So I'd Like to Volunteer

What do you mean? What are you implying? Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius

Sounds like WTF is making a racist comment about 2 AA men competing for the presidency of the US.......

oh gosh

What do you mean? What are you implying? Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius

It means that I am voting for Ron Paul for the Republican nomination. I would vote for him over Obama. Absent that I hope Obama gets re-elected. I think this pizza guy would get slaughtered in the general. So if my first choice (RP) is not elected, I hope my second choice (Obama) wins. Cain would assure Obama's re-election, IMHO. Guy sounds like the "Rent is to damn high" candidate that ran in NY congress spot a couple of years ago.

If Marshall thinks that is racist, then more power to him or anyone else that thinks they can read my mind.

I will say that two black men running would eliminate the need to hollar racism for a whole election cycle. Be kinda hard to do , don't ya think?

I've heard these calls of racism by the left for quite some time now.
I've never heard the Tea party say anything racist.
I listen to talk radio and I never hear racist comments or rants.
I read a lot and I have never read the conservatives print racial comments or slurs.
So, where is the proof? I believe Colin Powelll could have been a republican president some years back if his wife had let him.
That was before he came out of the RINO closet though.

Ansley,

I think its wonderful you're thinking of or are going to do so. I volunteered the last election and had a blast, even had the chance to meet my guy when he stopped by the Omaha headquarters.

If they'll have me, I'll do it again for his re-election campaign.

It means that I am voting for Ron Paul for the Republican nomination. I would vote for him over Obama. Absent that I hope Obama gets re-elected. I think this pizza guy would get slaughtered in the general. So if my first choice (RP) is not elected, I hope my second choice (Obama) wins. Cain would assure Obama's re-election, IMHO. Guy sounds like the "Rent is to damn high" candidate that ran in NY congress spot a couple of years ago.

If Marshall thinks that is racist, then more power to him or anyone else that thinks they can read my mind.

I will say that two black men running would eliminate the need to hollar racism for a whole election cycle. Be kinda hard to do , don't ya think? Originally Posted by WTF

Good, I didn't think you meant that but I wanted to ask.

Ron Paul has no chance.
McCain has no chance

Based on Ansley's assertions, I think we can rule out Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann.

You got to wake up real early to put one by ol' Chuckles

In the past I have volunteered my time with a few different organizations. A couple of them did background checks but not too in depth. Quite frankly if "Ansley" had been found out, it would not have mattered.

I would like to get involved with a presidential campaign. I really don't know much about what goes on when a person volunteers to do campaign work. Would it even be wise for an escort to try and be involved. Or should I stick to just sporting his bumper sticker on my car?

Opinions please. Originally Posted by Ansley

If there is a candidate out there that you are that enthusiastic about...go for it! Knock yourself out! Hell, I wish I still had that much passion for our political process.

As long as you keep a low profile in the office...I really don't think who you are or what you do will be a factor.

Enjoy!

I think we can rule out Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

Do Sarah or Michelle provide? How tough would their screening be? BBBJ? Greek? Just wondering. LOL

I'd hang out with Ansley for any candidate.

Hey libs....Representative Bachmann only uses one "l" in her first name....a little respect for a very impressive lady.......

It means that I am voting for Ron Paul for the Republican nomination. I would vote for him over Obama. Originally Posted by WTF

Ron Paul? He's against most everything you say you believe in....if this is true, then clearly you don't believe in anything except following your feelings.........

Ron Paul? He's against most everything you say you believe in....if this is true, then clearly you don't believe in anything except following your feelings......... Originally Posted by Marshall

Just because you can not comprehend what I write does not mean that I am who you think. Just because you can not see the complete picture does not mean I can not.

Take for instance health-care. We already have free health -care. The present system is bankrupting this country. That is why I am for reforming healthcare. Obama plan does not bring about socialized medicine. We already have socialized medicine. Ryan's plan is Socialized medicine too btw.

Again I live in reality , so when you hear me saying I like one plan over the other, it does not mean I think it the best plan, it is just the best option that I have left to vote for/aganist.

I live in reality. I prioritize things. Given choice's , I usually take what I believe to be the lesser of two evils.

You on the other hand bastaradize anyone that says anything negative about Reagan, including Dave Stockman, who is on board with Ron Paul , who you say you like. Now who is really fuc'd in the head? You are nothing but a complete ideologue. You are a partisan flame thrower. You throw them at your own people and do not even realize it.

Reagan did nothing on the spending side. Blame that on whomever. I blame it on Reagan. He would not touch Defense. You can not make a deal on cutting spending without cutting something from your own side. So I blame your hero Reagan for starting down this ignorant road of huge deficits spending. That is a bottom line fact you guys will not acknowledge. We will never get this spending problem under control until that happens. So in fact you and people like yoou are the problem on this budget issue.

Just because you can not comprehend what I write does not mean that I am who you think. you contradict yourselfJust because you can not see the complete picture does not mean I can not.

Take for instance health-care. We already have free health -care. we do? Nobody pays for it?The present system is bankrupting this country. That is why I am for reforming healthcare. Obama plan does not bring about socialized medicine.leads to more socialized medicine like Europe....Employers will dump health plans and leave only one option.....you need to read more We already have socialized medicine. Medicare and MedicaidRyan's plan is Socialized medicine too btw. leads away from socialized medicine....you lead me to think you don't know what socialized medicine is

Again I live in reality , so when you hear me saying I like one plan over the other, it does not mean I think it the best plan, it is just the best option that I have left to vote for/aganist. you don't appear to understand what you are voting for.....you don't seem to believe better options can be generated by the political process

I live in reality. I prioritize things. Given choice's , I usually take what I believe to be the lesser of two evils.

You on the other hand bastaradize anyone that says anything negative about Reagan, best president in 20th century...you can accuse him of failure on the issue of reducing the size of government, but you can't accuse him of hypocricy....but, if you consider the Peace Dividend, he was responsible for less military spending in the Clinton years! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!including Dave Stockman, who is on board with Ron Paul HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!, who you say you like.never said I liked Ron Paul, where's that post....will admit I think he is interesting....you have a habit of claiming I say things I never say....Now who is really fuc'd in the head?you of course You are nothing but a complete ideologue. You are a partisan flame thrower. You throw them at your own people and do not even realize it. I am not Republican, I am a conservative.....the Republican party is only a tool which conservatives use to get things done....many Republicans are hostile to conservatives

Reagan did nothing on the spending side. you need to take some government and American history classes.....under our system, who is in charge of spending? Who was in charge of spending during Reagan's terms?Blame that on whomever. I blame it on Reagan.because you are ignorant to the Constitution or history He would not touch Defense. clearly you do not know how he won the Cold War....defense is an enumerated power in the Constitution....Reagan was a strict constitutionalist....do you deny that Reagan won the Cold War? Do you deny that Reagan reduced the nuclear threat? Do you even know what agreements Reagan worked out with the Soviets/Russians?....did not Reagan ALWAYS advocate peace through strength? Are you claiming he accomplished nothing meaningful toward peace and security? Do you disagree with the concept of peace through strength? Is it not the #1 duty of a president to keep us safe?You can not make a deal on cutting spending without cutting something from your own side. Reagan had more problems to deal with than cutting spending....those other problems cost money to handle....do you want to forego his accomplishments? Where's that big picture view of things you claim to possess? Now, having said that, Reagan's victory created a Peace Dividend, so in the long run he did cut spending! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!So I blame your hero Reagan for starting down this ignorant road of huge deficits spending.No....Reagan won the Cold War which led to the Peace Dividend that Clinton used to take credit for balancing the budget....Clinton never balances the budget without Reagan winning the Cold War and Newt Gingrich being in charge of the House That is a bottom line fact you guys will not acknowledge. take a government and history course on the subject so We will never get this spending problem under control until that happens. So in fact you and people like yoou are the problem on this budget issue. Originally Posted by WTF

Care to respond to that Dweezle?