Just as it is safest to fly right after a plane crash.
I used to feel that way too, but the probability of a plane crash is the same for every flight. There is a term for that, gamblers fallacy.
( sorry if I come across as a smart ass)
what if open carry was the law, how would this be different? Originally Posted by sue_namiIt's hard to predict what the difference would have been. Twin Peaks would have refused to let anyone openly carrying enter. The fight might have been entirely in the parking lot instead of starting inside.
Considering that it's a bar, they were all carrying illegally anyway if they took the guns inside. I know the battle was in the parking lot.I have a question: I've never been to Twin Peaks but they are billed as a restaurant. State CCW law reads that it is okay to carry into a restaurant/bar so long as 51% of said restaurant/bar's revenu comes from the restaurant vs the bar. Example:Chili's is also a bar, but most of their revenue comes from food not alcohol, thus it is legal to carry. So the question:Is Twin Peaks a bar that serves food, making over 51% of their revenue from alcohol or a restaurant that serves alcohol, making over 51% of their revenue from selling food?
I wonder how many of them were carrying legally even without the bar aspect. One might suspect that some of the shooters were already felons and not legal to possess guns. I think knives were mentioned as well. I wonder how many of the knives were illegal as well. Originally Posted by GneissGuy
I have a question: I've never been to Twin Peaks but they are billed as a restaurant. State CCW law reads that it is okay to carry into a restaurant/bar so long as 51% of said restaurant/bar's revenu comes from the restaurant vs the bar. Example:Chili's is also a bar, but most of their revenue comes from food not alcohol, thus it is legal to carry. So the question:Is Twin Peaks a bar that serves food, making over 51% of their revenue from alcohol or a restaurant that serves alcohol, making over 51% of their revenue from selling food? Originally Posted by oneiI have no reason to doubt you, but that is a stupid law. So if I up the price of the ham sandwich so I go from 50% food income to 51%, that makes a difference on whether guns are legal inside?
Yep. They kinda sorta shore do. They put a sign laik this up by tha entrance. Now, sum places may be lyin' an' jus' sayin' thar more of a bar then a resty-raunt jus' ta ban guns on thar property. But thet's on them.
Do the establishments post what % of revenue is bar based so patrons know if they are committing a crime?
Originally Posted by Old-T