Most 2016 predictions were wrong, other than in the popular vote count. In 2018, most predictions were correct. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
so your post had no point .. Thanks!!
MAGA dance!
it's time to dance the MAGA danceI love the MAGA dance. I request it from all the girls who sell their pussy for a living. The story's they tell are all the same. They start out like this...My daddy voted for Trump. After I graduated college I wanted to distance myself from his hate so I took out an ad...............Thanks for indirectly contributing to the role play
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
I love the MAGA dance. I request it from all the girls who sell their pussy for a living. The story's they tell are all the same. They start out like this...My daddy voted for Trump. After I graduated college I wanted to distance myself from his hate so I took out an ad...............Thanks for indirectly contributing to the role play Originally Posted by themystic
Most 2016 predictions were wrong, other than in the popular vote count. In 2018, most predictions were correct. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXActually, you need to qualify your definition of predictions. Most "pundits" were wrong in 2016 and many wrong in 2018 in at least regards to the to size of the mythical blue wave.
so your post had no point .. Thanks!!
/QUOTE]
Then neither did the OP's post. My post casted doubt on Barleycorn's statement that Politico predicted a Trump victory in 2020. My input contradicted his statement. If you don't like the discussion he and I are having, feel free to drop out. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
I can afford $ 300 and up for some prime "My Daddy is a MAGA daddy". The MAGA Cheerleader Dance doesn't cost extra. Thanks again to you and your ilk Originally Posted by themysticThis is actually getting funny watching some dig in deeper and fall lower and lower. The object appears to be to denigrate providers whose fathers are Trump supporters. Yet the same guy is willing to pay them $300 extra just to talk. Sounds like another instance of a great Trump economy in action and a another liberal sucker born every minute...
Interesting. I don't know if Politico is right or left but Bill Scher of Politico believes Democrats will win the 2020 election by an electoral count of 296-242 based on the 2018 House voting.
"Sure enough, Scher’s map keeps all of the Hillary Clinton states from the 2016 election in the Democratic Party camp. But thanks to a strong showing in those congressional races, his projection has several Trump states defecting to Democratic candidates: Arizona, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. It’s enough to tip the balance of power leftward, and away from the right. This “House vote” model has Democrats winning the Electoral College in 2020 by a score of 296 to 242."
https://observer.com/2018/12/2020-tr...te-prediction/
Larry Sabato currently has the 2020 electoral vote at 248-244 favoring the Republicans with only Arizona, Wisconsin, NH, 1 in Maine, and Pennsylvania (total of 46 electoral votes) up in the air.
The Cook Political Report has it at 232-220 Democrats with Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Florida, and 1 Maine up in the air.
Inside Elections has it at 269-215 Democrats with Wisconsin, NC, and Florida up in the air.
https://www.270towin.com/maps/inside...2020-president
It is very early. No Democratic front-runner yet in the race for their nominee. Will the economy stay strong and remain a positive for Trump? Will Democrats be able to stifle those in the party on the far left (AOC)? Right now the race for 2020 POTUS is by most UNBIASED accounts up in the air. Obviously you look at it as a fait accompli and Trump will coast to victory in 2020. I'll wait a while before making a prediction. I was dead wrong in 2016 and right on in 2018. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX