The first would be Obstruction of Justice for three separate incidents described in Volume ll of the Mueller report. Don Mcghan has firsthand knowledge of those incidents and his testimony could support a new charge.
You mean testimony Mueller didn't get in 30 hours of questioning?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia/white-house-counsel-interviewed-for-30-hours-in-russia-probe-new-york-times-idUSKBN1L30Q1
The White House’s top lawyer has cooperated extensively with the special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, sharing detailed accounts about the episodes at the heart of the inquiry into whether President Donald Trump obstructed justice, the New York Times reported on Saturday.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/18/u...stigation.html
White House Counsel, Don McGahn, Has Cooperated Extensively in Mueller Inquiry
The second would be perjury. The fat lying bastard claimed he knew nothing about contacts with Russians or Wikileaks. The testimony from Roger Stone’s trial indicates he lied in his written response to the Mueller questionnaire. Bottom line, he knew his good buddy was working with Wikileaks.
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
The testimony from Roger Stone’s trial indicates he lied in his written response to the Mueller questionnaire.
Now where have I heard that charge before? Oh! I know, Cohen's testimony was going to prove Trump lied. How'd that work out? Testimony without corroboration is not proof, documents are proof. Did Stone offer any documentary evidence?