Two threads on the identical topic.No, but it is another thread that demonstrates how fucking stupid your responses are. LMFAO
we get it your assholiness...
IS THIS ANOTHER BENGHAZI THREAD? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
OK, I'll play ...That's funny!
She became a powerful spokesperson for DC Matic (not to be confused with the less useful "PC Matic"), a powerful new privacy tool.
DC Matic: The Hillary-Approved Email Server (75-second ad) Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight
Hold on....I'm still trying to think of something positive.....besides letting Bill have some alone time. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornDon't hold your breath while thinking.
She restored peace in all of the lands...Where have you guys been? Originally Posted by nwarounderWhat will she do as president? Restore the population of all the animals on the endangered species list, lol. She's a criminal you dumbass. She shouldn't even be allowed to run for any public office.
does looking sexy as hell in a pantsuit count? I can't wait until campaign season gets in full swing. Bound to be a nip slip in there somewhere. Originally Posted by WombRaiderIs that sarcasm or do you really like BUGs?
Is that sarcasm or do you really like BUGs?All candidates or politicians are going to have certain rules of that nature. What would be the purpose of unflattering photos of her, really? Other than to be distasteful. It's not censorship. Doing something in such a manner, just to embarrass someone is pretty low. I for one love big-bottomed girls. They make the rocking-world go round.
FYI: BUG = Big Ugly Girl
Along with "rules" about language and "word choices" ( a real joke from the trashiest mouth to enter the White House in recent history) .... there have been "rules" in the past (which I have called the "Coach Royal Rule") that "prohibited" below the waist shots of the bulging ass and legs of Hillarious. Occasionally it really can't be helped, and as would be expected some media people don't shine to "instructions" on censorship. Originally Posted by LexusLover
What would be the purpose of unflattering photos of her, really? . Originally Posted by WombRaiderWhat would be the purpose of "flattering" photos of her, really?
What would be the purpose of "flattering" photos of her, really?What does her body have to do with the ability to do a job? Interestingly enough, you've shown your sexist nature by using this argument concerning a woman. I doubt you would care, if the candidate were a man.
Here's a novel idea: Accurate photos.
She's spent a life time building up the fat on her ass and legs, and has done a much better job of it than filling up her resume. She should be proud of her achievement ... filling out those pant suits tents she wears. Why should she keep trying to hide what she is? Don't we have enough of that in politics today?
Don't you get a little pissed when you get a "bait and switch" from a provider? Never mind, I forgot. You've not been around long enough to get any pussy.....fake or otherwise. Originally Posted by LexusLover
What does her body have to do with the ability to do a job? Interestingly enough, you've shown your sexist nature by using this argument concerning a woman. I doubt you would care, if the candidate were a man. Originally Posted by WombRaiderSo it's her mind that gives you a "CHUBBY"?... or the "Pants Suite"? ... Let me know!