Drumpf is a TRAITOR!

It's all over the news and just makes him look bad. Even CIA intelligence and other national security officials are alarmed he would even make remarks such as this, and on public television straight into the camera! It makes people wonder whose side he is on. Are we voting for an American President or a puppet for Putin? Makes you wonder. Even other countries are wondering and it makes them nervous, especially when you also thrown in his comments about NATO. Originally Posted by SassySue

You know the more hysterical you get the stupider sound.

You keep regurgitating the same BS even after it's been proven wrong..and you keep posting links from very biased sources.

No one takes you seriously. You're ate up with the dumb ass.

You know the more hysterical you get the stupider sound. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Why Donald Trump’s recent comments on the alliance caused such an uproar


Donald Trump shocked foreign-policy professionals and observers when he remarked to The New York Times that if he were president, the United States might not come to the defense of an attacked NATO ally that hadn’t fulfilled its “obligation to make payments.” The remark broke with decades of bipartisan commitment to the alliance and, as Jeffrey Goldberg wrote in The Atlantic, aligned well with the interests of Russia, whose ambitions NATO was founded largely to contain. One Republican in Congress openly wondered whether his party’s nominee could be “seemingly so pro-Russia” because of “connections and contracts and things from the past or whatever.”


See and read this article before you call me stupid:

http://www.theatlantic.com/internati...russia/493001/

Even John McCain thinks his policies are dangerous.

Why Donald Trump’s recent comments on the alliance caused such an uproar


Donald Trump shocked foreign-policy professionals and observers when he remarked to The New York Times that if he were president, the United States might not come to the defense of an attacked NATO ally that hadn’t fulfilled its “obligation to make payments.” The remark broke with decades of bipartisan commitment to the alliance and, as Jeffrey Goldberg wrote in The Atlantic, aligned well with the interests of Russia, whose ambitions NATO was founded largely to contain. One Republican in Congress openly wondered whether his party’s nominee could be “seemingly so pro-Russia” because of “connections and contracts and things from the past or whatever.”


See and read this article before you call me stupid:

http://www.theatlantic.com/internati...russia/493001/

Even John McCain thinks his policies are dangerous. Originally Posted by SassySue

To date, hildebeest is the only candidate for president that's said or done anything to get other Americans killed, Silly Suzy Simpleton: including an American ambassador.

You know the more hysterical you get the stupider sound.

You keep regurgitating the same BS even after it's been proven wrong..and you keep posting links from very biased sources.

No one takes you seriously. You're ate up with the dumb ass. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

And yet, she does it once again.
Idiots never learn.

It's all over the news and just makes him look bad. Even CIA intelligence and other national security officials are alarmed he would even make remarks such as this, and on public television straight into the camera! Originally Posted by SassySue

#1: If the "CIA intelligence and other national security officials are" actually talking shit to the media they should all be fired. #2: If the media is reporting what the "CIA intelligence and other national security officials are" saying to the media, the reporters and editors publishing it should be fired with them.

Having said that ... you, SassyPoo, have no way of knowing what you are reading is even true .... that was actually reported by "CIA intelligence and other national security officials" or who they were so that it can be confirmed they do any more than empty wastepaper baskets into shredders!!!

Let me give you a real-live example ..



and here is the other one ...

#1: If the "CIA intelligence and other national security officials are" actually talking shit to the media they should all be fired. #2: If the media is reporting what the "CIA intelligence and other national security officials are" saying to the media, the reporters and editors publishing it should be fired with them.

Having said that ... you, SassyPoo, have no way of knowing what you are reading is even true .... that was actually reported by "CIA intelligence and other national security officials" or who they were so that it can be confirmed they do any more than empty wastepaper baskets into shredders!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Sounds more like the media is making shit up again. SURPRISE!

Sounds more like the media is making shit up again. SURPRISE! Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Someone is ....

Trump was right about the "rigging" and he's right about media!

A problem is ... the recent events at the DNC merely CONFIRMED what the general public (voters) have known about the Clintons from day one ... they looked the other way, because in the 90's things were "good" .... nothing to do with the Clintons per se ... but Congress ... but things were "good" ...

no need to rock the boat. That's not the case now! The boat is sinking and one of the crew that put a leak in it wants to take over as Captain ... there's a storm surrounding us and a leaking vessel ... and she can't find her ass with both hands .... never has and never will.....

.. "Change Maker"?

What did she change about Bill? He was fucking employees in the Governor's Mansion and he was fucking one in the White House .... and no telling how many during "incalls" ... while on the road. She can't even change her own toilet paper!

The only thing the pro-Clinton crowd has: Trash Trump!

If the FBI won't do its job, maybe Russia can. If they have the emails, they should turn them over. The problem is not who exposes the emails, the problem is what the emails will say.

If the FBI won't do its job, maybe Russia can. If they have the emails, they should turn them over. The problem is not who exposes the emails, the problem is what the emails will say. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

+1

However, no one has confirmed that Russia did anything, and Assange has made it clear that he has an ax to grind with hildebeest.

Assange, Avowed Foe of hildebeest, Timed Email Release for Democratic Convention

WASHINGTON — Six weeks before the anti-secrecy organization WikiLeaks published an archive of hacked Democratic National Committee emails ahead of the Democratic convention, the organization’s founder, Julian Assange, foreshadowed the release — and made it clear that he hoped to harm hildebeest’s chances of winning the presidency.

Mr. Assange’s remarks in a June 12 interview underscored that for all the drama of the discord that the disclosures have sown among supporters of Bernie Sanders — and of the unproven speculation that the Russian government provided the hacked data to WikiLeaks in order to help Donald J. Trump — the disclosures are also the latest chapter in the long-running tale of Mr. Assange’s battles with the Odumbo administration.

In the interview, Mr. Assange told a British television host, Robert Peston of the ITV network, that his organization had obtained “emails related to hildebeest which are pending publication,” which he pronounced “great.” He also suggested that he not only opposed her candidacy on policy grounds, but also saw her as a personal foe.

[Assange] thought it was predictable that Mrs. Clinton would wield power in two ways he found problematic.

First, citing his “personal perspective,” Mr. Assange accused Hildebeest of having been among those pushing to indict him after WikiLeaks disseminated a quarter of a million diplomatic cables during her tenure as secretary of state.

“We do see her as a bit of a problem for freedom of the press more generally,” Mr. Assange said.

(NYT)

If the FBI won't do its job, maybe Russia can. If they have the emails, they should turn them over. The problem is not who exposes the emails, the problem is what the emails will say. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Why should they, just because Trump is "begging" them to do so?

If the FBI won't do its job, maybe Russia can. If they have the emails, they should turn them over. The problem is not who exposes the emails, the problem is what the emails will say. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Amen to that!

Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

Hey oinkboy,

How can Trump be a "traitor"? No harm in getting chummy with Pooty-poot. You don't have to take my word for it either. Your messiah proclaimed just 4 years ago that Russia isn't a geo-political foe. Did you forget? Wake up, oinkboy. The 1980s called and they're asking for their foreign policy back!

Hey oinkboy,

How can Trump be a traitor? No harm in getting chummy with Pooty-poot. You don't have to take my word for it either. Your messiah proclaimed just 4 years ago that Russia isn't a geo-political foe. Did you forget? Wake up, oinkboy. The 1980s called and they're asking for their foreign policy back!

] Originally Posted by lustylad

W sucked up to him and got punked, he will punk Trump also.

W sucked up to him and got punked, he will punk Trump also. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Just like YOU get punked everyday down at the 'holes, right EKIM ? !!!!

Drumpf is a national tragedy.