I wonder who would know more about the local scene than the ASPD administrators and moderators, who ran the ASPD board for YEARS.
Originally Posted by AustinWildFlowers
I don't know either...
Maybe guys that regularly spend their hard earned money on the ladies? See your Next Comment to understand why I make this one.
Neither CK or TC has ever seen any of our girls,
then they would have no first hand knowledge of the ladies and the experiences the ladies were delivering were delivering wouldn't ya say?.... They would only know what you tell them?
but they have met ME. Maybe they consider the girl's well-being to be the top priority, and maybe they respect the way I take care of that for Wild Flowers.
That is where we differ in opinion. I am more concerned with accurate information as well as the Hobbyist's well being which require accurate reviews without undue influence to be legit.... I considered the ASPD Austin forums to have been improperly influenced by the very people you feel are the "experts"....
Both CK and TC were a major part of the "scene" for years. They know more about the clients, providers and agencies, and the "Hobby" in general, than anyone on this board. Especially some "expert" with 101 posts and 1 review.
I don't see either of them with a Review Count or Post Count here on Eccie any better than mine...... On ASPD I had a few hundred reviews and enough of a Post Count over the years to be considered legit.... But hey.... That's old news....
As to your screening clients..... As I recall you used my post count as well as review count to blanketly approve me when we talked last year..... After networking with other's and discussing events that never made it to the board or were wiped from the board I went a different direction.... Sadly as you did have a few ladies of interest.....
And I'm sure that if, and it's a big "if", Whispers had the gonads and dedication to sponsor an event on behalf of "the community", he'd have been able to spot a hot-looking female HPD UC easy. Riiiiiight...
Shows how much you know... I've sponsored several GC Luncheons over the last couple of years that were attended by many and enjoyed in a safe manner by all.... Many felt they were stopped because they were perceived as competing for the Social Crowd although they were totally different events for different purposes..... The Luncheons I ran never had an issue and the person that deemed them "unsafe" was the one in charge of the party raided where some members were arrested.
Seems a bit unreal huh?
Blaming CK for the Houston deal is like blaming the Hatians for the earthquake.
Shit happens. Nobody got busted, because nothing illegal occurred. CK saw to that.
You ought to take some time to read instead of thump your chest...... because there were several arrests made because some guys and gals were stupid enough to break the rules..... Then again... Thump away if that's what you want....
But the whole system was put together and people led to believe they were safe because of all the vouching that went on... too much trust was put into too large a mix of people....
People got complacent....
Someone is certainly to blame.... If not the one doing the Vouch Checks then who?
"Reports and stories"... Let's hear 'em, Whispers. The Circle Jerk hides BCD swapping "shocking" rumors like gossiping old ladies at a Bingo parlor. If you've got a LEGIT criticism of me or WF, other than the fact that I don't brown-nose clowns, and call a punk, a punk. Let's hear it, Hero!
Guys who sit at home and write criticism about men who do things they would never have the guts or ability or generosity to do make me weary. There's a name for guys like that - "Ankle-Biters". Nibble away, Whispers.
My original comments were not at you... They were questioning the credibility of those you were hanging your laurels on... Advice to a new member of the community to look a little deeper before she makes a decision...... That was all....
Did I strike a nerve?
Sorry.