Who wants to start the pool on the Biden impeachment?

I'm surprised how many are chomping at the bit for President Harris. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Couldn't be any worse and if the Republicans have the House and Senate, Harris couldn't do a darn thing with her less than 2 years in office.


And the American people, OK, Republicans and Independents, will have a field day with a President Harris who I predict would have a nervous breakdown with the criticism, laughter that will come her way before that time was up.


Hey, a person can dream can't they?

Looks like you did, JL.

Links? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

... Links? ... Who needs links when I can point you
to the article... Take a look at the Washington Free Beacon
and the Biden family and Sinopec.

That will surely help clue you on.

And no need to thank me, mate.
Virtue is its-own reward.

#### Salty

Here's yer mate Salty with the name of the company - "Sinopec"...

Not sure if they pronounce it SIN-opec... or sin-OPEC.
Or just Sinopec.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

its pronounced as sigh-no-pec

Back in Feb of 2021, I wrote on my guess on the liberal-left's path to replacing President Biden.

I think that the big money string pullers will want to first replace VP Harris with someone who will do their will while speaking as well as President Obama at public functions. This will happen before the midterm elections. The reasons why she would resign are a bit tricky, some health issue most likely. If Hillery Clinton is in the running, it might be through some unfortunate tragic accident.

President Biden will be kept around until after the midterms. This is because anyone who replaces the president before the mids may only run for president once after serving out the uncompleted term. However, it the president is replaced after the mids, that person may run for two terms.

This is essentially the path to the presidency taken by Gerald Ford in the 1970s when he first replaced VP Spiro Agnew (who was endited for bribery) as Vice President and later on stepped into the presidency following the disgraced Richard Nixon.

My pool pick on impeachment? December2022 or Jan 2023.

Impeached for what? I am no expert, but I think you have to actually do something actionable that is impeachable to be impeached. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

nope. See Trump impeachment. No crimes committed still impeached. Biden at least has corruption that will end him.

I'm surprised how many are chomping at the bit for President Harris. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

No worse than Biden... and it'll be fun watching her try to speak

SO, how many understand that the reserves are put out there at AUCTION TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER Originally Posted by chefnerd

What are we selling again Oh STRATEGIC reserves. Does it matter it was sold in a bidding process. it was sold to benefit the Big guy and his 10% cut.

... Links? ... Who needs links when I can point you
to the article... Take a look at the Washington Free Beacon
and the Biden family and Sinopec.

That will surely help clue you on.

And no need to thank me, mate.
Virtue is its-own reward.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

That’s where to find the truth!

Washington Free Beacon!

I always wonder how these blogs stay afloat, but there are people who really read this shit. Salty, do you pay to eliminate the pop up ads and “Mensa test” games?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Even if the Republicans take the house and senate they don’t have the stones to impeach him. When in leadership a Republican Congress is usually feckless

Lets see now . . ."Treason, bribery o other high crimes . . ." etc.

I am, more and more, convinced that bribery has occurred (Ukraine prosicutor). If it is bribery involving a foreign power) (China), the case could be made for treason.

I believe that the charges brought President Trump were fart weaker. The "Russian Collusion" charge against President Trump has been debunked by the liberal press.

It is my intuition that President Trump will be viewed in a positive light by future historians while President Biden will be excoriated by them.

Even if the Republicans take the house and senate they don’t have the stones to impeach him. When in leadership a Republican Congress is usually feckless Originally Posted by doseccie

I agree. And the Republicans like Mitch and Kevin are vested in trying to keep Trump out of power. I think it might bring things to a party split though if they don't impeach Biden.... their base will have a conniption fit.

That’s where to find the truth!

Washington Free Beacon!

I always wonder how these blogs stay afloat, but there are people who really read this shit. Salty, do you pay to eliminate the pop up ads and “Mensa test” games?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

... Hee Hee! Of course I do, mate!
Why even ask the question...

Ye Christ!... I almost spilled-over me beer from laughin'

#### Salty

I agree. And the Republicans like Mitch and Kevin are vested in trying to keep Trump out of power. I think it might bring things to a party split though if they don't impeach Biden.... their base will have a conniption fit. Originally Posted by texassapper

... At the end o' the day - the RINO Repubs surely
understand that "keeping Trump out of power" is the
wrong move - because the voters WILL revolt.
And NOT support the Republican candidates.

I don't believe Sleepy Joe will make
January as the President... they will remove him
before then... The Dems don't want Biden tainted
with the Impeachment process - which Repubs will
be forced to do in the Spring.

#### Salty

Even if the Republicans take the house and senate they don’t have the stones to impeach him. When in leadership a Republican Congress is usually feckless Originally Posted by doseccie

Jim Jordan doesn't have stones?

It takes more than a handful of people in congress. Jordan is great, but we need 300 more of him.

Jim Jordan doesn't have stones? Originally Posted by HedonistForever

he'd make a good speaker of the House. Hes someways similar to Newt Gingrich on certain things.

Unless there are sure cracks in the "blue wall", where a trial may actually lead to a conviction in the Senate...I don't want to see another "show trial".