Are yall noticing this new site? Slixa????

I recieved a phone call from a lady trying to get me to sign up. She said that the site is in pre-launch stages and trying to get select providers to join. I was also sent a link to my email and they are being supported by verifiedplaymates.com

Well Folks I just noticed my new review and guess where he listed he found us ( Brooke Taylor & Myself a double last weekend)
Too Funny They haven't even launched and I am getting business from there.
If you look at the pre-launch page below where it says join they are already listing some of us who have joined. I got Brooke to join and we both benefited
I'd say it's working for me...


Review: Double the fun with Alluring Allison and Brooke Taylor
Date: 11/10/12
Provider: Alluring Allison & Brooke Taylor
Phone: 832-510-4682
Email Address: n/a
URL / Website: www.slixa.com
City: Houston
State: Texas

The site is already up and running? I didn't know gentlemen had access already. Glad it's worked for you so far Allison.

I see no reason to go to this site. I already have this one and bp along with p411 what more can they offer. Guess its more for the ladies to try and find new clients.

Does anyone know who runs this site? I am very leary of new sites because most of the time you do not know who runs them. They can be scary, freaked out, jealous chics... I have experienced this already.

If anyone can find out who owns, runs or manages this site, it would make me feel better about it.

I see no reason to go to this site. I already have this one and bp along with p411 what more can they offer. Guess its more for the ladies to try and find new clients. Originally Posted by trey

Some gents do not have p411...they don't want the paper trail. (from what I've heard). I do not think this website will cater to the BP audience. From my understanding they are marketing more towards the same audience as EROS. The site design is a little more intuitive. Ladies have profiles, in contrast to daily ads. They charge per month, instead of per post. And judging from what someone said earlier, they may already have a client base who is not looking for the quickest session, but more so for the more quality sessions. Again, that's a slightly different market than the BP market. And as much as some guys love eccie... this website can be a bit overwhelming for guys who are simply looking for a good time with a hot lady. You get on here and get all caught up in these online camaraderies and what started out as a simple endeavor to find a hot lady, ends up turning into the most much, much more. From my understanding of Slixa, it is not a forum, so that eliminates a lot of the crap that comes with this entire "online friend" thing and is aiming more so to connect hobbyist to providers. Not to other hobbyist. Eccie is a site more dedicated to allowing for the information exchange. Hence the reviews. Eccie has a lot of users who come here simply to jerk around (no pun intended) and heckle other users (see: sandbox) . I hope this site won't be like that. From what I have seen on the ladies side so far, there isn't even a way to connect to other users. Just to put up your profile and ad. I don't know if this is the way it will remain or if I just haven't perused the website enough. Seems pretty cut and dry so far. I hope it last longer than some of the other ones mentioned before. (geisha affair, naughty reviews, cityvibe, girl-directory, ect) Again, I can just tell you based off what I have personally experienced thus far.

Well Folks I just noticed my new review and guess where he listed he found us ( Brooke Taylor & Myself a double last weekend)
Too Funny They haven't even launched and I am getting business from there.
If you look at the pre-launch page below where it says join they are already listing some of us who have joined. I got Brooke to join and we both benefited
I'd say it's working for me...


Review: Double the fun with Alluring Allison and Brooke Taylor
Date: 11/10/12
Provider: Alluring Allison & Brooke Taylor
Phone: 832-510-4682
Email Address: n/a
URL / Website: www.slixa.com
City: Houston
State: Texas Originally Posted by Alluring Allison

NOW I'm convinced...

I notice that a lot of the sites that have had problems usually stems from them being more involve than just being a advertising platform, (sponsoring meet and greets, etc)
as long as your only a advertising platform and not a promoter actively bring people actually together, as long as people are doing it on their own there shouldn't be any issues,

As I have mentioned... I have had a very extensive conversation with LeeAnn the owner of Slixa. I generally go in with a list of questions because I know what my advertisers are looking for.

In Reference to the mobile version of the site. I asked her about that when we spoke and they are the beta stages of what is known as RWD

Responsive Webdesign. Only about 3% of the webdesign on the web now is RWD and this is very progressive thinking for a company. So very soon any concerns about mobile applications will be solved. It seems this company intends to be the leader in this industry and revolutionize the hobbyost and provider's experience.

As for a marketing plan I can tell you there has never been a launch with this much clout behind it. Here's how Lee Ann Explained it to me in a follow up email:

Staff Edit: Contents of email removed per rule #9 of the guidelines. CZ.

Here's a little about RWD.... It will probably boar most but it might actually give some you techies wood...lol

Responsive web design

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

An example of a responsive website, The Boston Globe, displayed on multiple devices


Responsive web design (often abbreviated to RWD) is an approach to web design in which a site is crafted to provide an optimal viewing experience—easy reading and navigation with a minimum of resizing, panning, and scrolling—across a wide range of devices (from desktop computer monitors to mobile phones).[1][2][3]

Elements of responsive web design (RWD)

A site designed with RWD[1][4] uses CSS3 media queries,[3][5][6] an extension of the @media rule,[7] to adapt the layout to the viewing environment—along with fluid proportion-based grids[8] and flexible images:.[9][10][11][12]

• Media queries allow the page to use different CSS style rules based on characteristics of the device the site is being displayed on, most commonly the width of the browser.
• The fluid grid concept calls for page element sizing to be in relative units like percentages or EMs, rather than absolute units like pixels or points.[8]
• Flexible images are also sized in relative units (up to 100%), so as to prevent them from displaying outside their containing element.[9]

Related concepts

Mobile first, unobtrusive JavaScript, and progressive enhancement

"Mobile First" and "Unobtrusive JavaScript"/"Progressive Enhancement" (strategies for when a new site design is being considered) are related concepts that predated RWD: browsers of basic mobile phones do not understand Javascript or media queries, so the recommended practice is to create a basic web site then enhance it for smart phones and PCs—rather than try "graceful degradation" to make a complex, image-heavy site work on the most basic mobile phones.[13][14][15][16]
Progressive enhancement based on browser-, device-, or feature-detection

Where a web site must support basic mobile devices that lack Javascript, Browser ("user agent") detection (also called "browser sniffing"), and mobile device detection[14][17] are two ways of deducing if certain HTML and CSS features are supported (as a basis for progressive enhancement)—however, these methods are not completely reliable.
For more capable mobile phones and PCs, JavaScript frameworks like Modernizr, jQuery, and jQuery Mobile that can directly test browser support for HTML/CSS features (or identify the device or user agent) are popular. Polyfills can be used to add support for features—e.g. to support media queries (required for RWD), and enhance HTML5 support, on Internet Explorer. Feature detection also might not be completely reliable with older browsers: some may report that a feature is available, when it is either missing or so poorly implemented that it is effectively nonfunctional.[18][19]
Challenges, and other approaches

Luke Wroblewski has summarized some of the RWD and mobile design challenges, and created a catalog of multi-device layout patterns.[20][21][22] He suggests that, compared with a simple RWD approach, Device Experience or RESS (Responsive Web Design with Server Side Components) approaches can provide a user experience that is better optimized for mobile devices.[23][24][25] Server-side "dynamic CSS" implementation of stylesheet languages like Sass can be part of such an approach.
One problem for RWD is that banner advertisements and videos are not fluid.[26] However search advertising and (banner) display advertising support specific device platform targeting and different advertisement size formats for desktop, smartphone, and basic mobile devices. Different landing page URLs can be used for different platforms,[27] or AJAX can be used to display different ad variants on a page.[21][28][17] Originally Posted by MagnificMedia

So it's build primarily using twitter-bootstrap toolkit
http://www.w3resource.com/twitter-bo...p/tutorial.php

would of been a lot easier than explaining something most people wouldn't understand, easier to show them.

I

Slixa feels it's main competitor is EROS in respect to business model.
I have always been a fan and promoter of EROS but they have become very expensive because they feel they are the leader...Which they are but they also have lost site of the original focus... Now there are so many distraction and pop overs etc... I think Slixa has built a better Mouse Trap and have the funding to go the distance.

Look It Over Click Here Originally Posted by MagnificMedia

Eros has been around for quite a while and is considered a mature site, with that being said, they understand that there are a lot of escort and BB type sites both paid and free that show escort pictures, let face it the content is the same just the packaging is different, if everyone is showing the same content it doesn't matter which site a guy chooses, so you need something beside the basic content to keep drawing in prospective buyers of that content and to keep them there, that's why Eros has added the webcams, stores, other adult material to purchase beyond just the escort content,
basically they been there done that, and it's not what keeps the guys coming back advertising the same content you can find anywhere else. they haven't lost sight, they been around long enough to know it take more to hold the male attention span. and it also gives a steady alternative source of income, so all their eggs are no longer in one basket.
Because of this they get a lot more hold time on the site, once the guys look at the pretty ladies they can do something else without leaving the site, and they can easily go back to the ladies once they tire of the other fare. it's all in one shopping.

Another thing that Eros is looking at is the guys who really aren't going to hire the escorts, but like to look at the ladies pictures, these guys will purchase the webcam and other adult media fare.

As long as they can keep the guys coming back you won't see a mass exodus of ladies, Silax will have to do something to keep the guys there, just having a pretty design won't keep them for long since the content is the same, It's my opinion, I may be wrong, but guys aren't that loyal to the packaging, as long as the site has good functionality they will stick around.

Also I notice that some ladies feel that if the site charges less that it's not as good, they are willing to pay the higher rates because it has the illusion of being more upscale, not because it's doing anything special,

Also what Eros is good at is getting free advertisement from the very people they sell profiles to, how many ladies have pay for a profile on Eros then place their (Eros) banner or badge on your site, shrew indeed. some ladies sites look like free billboards for all the sites they post on, pay to use.
Since the Silax site is not open,yet I can't comment on it's search engine, Eros is good for finding what you're looking for,

Will be interesting to see where this goes. Hopefully it will be another good resource for both.

How long does it take to get a response from the folks over there? I sent a request and I'm waiting for a human to make it possible!

Does anyone know who runs this site? I am very leary of new sites because most of the time you do not know who runs them. They can be scary, freaked out, jealous chics... I have experienced this already.

If anyone can find out who owns, runs or manages this site, it would make me feel better about it. Originally Posted by smoothnsilky

It looks very similar to the Ashley Madison site...too many parallels for me to be comfortable about giving them my info...

It looks very similar to the Ashley Madison site...too many parallels for me to be comfortable about giving them my info... Originally Posted by giteneny

From looking at the site it's not parallel to Ashley Madison at all, doesn't look like guys have to paid anything to use this site, so you won't be giving out any info if you are a guy just wanting to contact escorts. so no worries for you.

I find it fascinating that the two ladies who posted a link in this thread are both posting the same affiliate link.