Republican playbook for getting elected

Here’s your link, boys. Mandel is a fruitcake missing a few green cherries.

https://www.newsweek.com/pro-trump-s...l-riot-1637331

You all owe VM an apology. And ought to think twice before piling on after someone plays “teh” lie card.

Makes you look lazy and uninformed. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Noozeweek...yeah!

I can only imagine the response.

Thank U - vm and wtf

As per usual - nothing but DPST Trolling adn Lies.
Grow up - Please!!!!

Thank U - vm and wtf

As per usual - nothing but DPST Trolling adn Lies.
Grow up - Please!!!! Originally Posted by oeb11

Even more SPAM

Noozeweek...yeah! Originally Posted by bb1961

Looks like another mistake. Newsweek is a reputable source.


Not like Townhall and some other sources members are fond of.

Newsweek is a reputable source.

Not like Townhall and some other sources members are fond of. Originally Posted by VitaMan

"Reputable" = Reflects my bias.

"Not reputable" = Refutes my bias.

Y'all could try listening to the actual arguments instead of whining about the source.

noosweek is still around? damn.

"Reputable" = Reflects my bias.

"Not reputable" = Refutes my bias.

Y'all could try listening to the actual arguments instead of whining about the source. Originally Posted by lustylad

Ain't that the truth.


But we all know why some go right to the "source" bullshit, because they would rather not have to actually think and debate, just yell "source" and "racist" and hey, your job is done!


And yes, some sources are more reliable than others but you do yourself no service by going down your list to see if it's left or right leaning before ever reading and dismissing.

Town hall ?


Elmer Fudd ?

Town hall ?


Elmer Fudd ? Originally Posted by VitaMan

... Not sure what the issue is. If we can quote some article in The Atlantic
or The New Yorker, then why can't VitaMan use Newsweek as a source?

Surely all seems silly to me.

### Salty

4 years of literally the entire MSM getting it wrong about Trump/ Russia collusion and conspiring to keep the Hunter Biden story out of the news calling it "Russian propaganda" ( to name two ) and we are going to argue about the purity of sources? They all got it wrong, ALL of them! Remember that next time you want to argue sources.


New Rule ( if only I could ) if you don't want to debate what is said STFU!


Oh, and the answer to the Republicans, sit back and watch.

... Not sure what the issue is. If we can quote some article in The Atlantic
or The New Yorker, then why can't VitaMan use Newsweek as a source?

Surely all seems silly to me.

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

The straightforward answer is this is another play from the playbook. If the source article does not agree with your agenda, attack the source (the messenger). It's no different than attacking pollsters. Bad poll numbers = a fraudulent pollster. Good poll numbers = a great pollster.


That is why so many responses end up using tabloid journalism. Because it fits their agendas.

The Republican playbook for getting elected :


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...cists-n2597220


DPST lies of teh racist, marxist narrative from Comrade Xi!
Newsweek - is nothing but Communist indoctrination adn propaganda - 1b1~

I see more LOCKDOWNS AND MAIL IN VOTING IN NOV 2022

Townhall is well known for its radical tabloid right wing views.
A movie quote "That's all it does."


It is not in the same class as Newsweek.
Your characterization of Newsweek demonstrates your level of thought.


Ideologues are people who pretend they know how to “make the world a better place” before they’ve taken care of their own chaos within.