I have withheld posting on this thread because there are folks that have overly dogmatic views of what they believe a SD/SB relationship is. But I saw your post and had to reply.
You wish it could be there without the feelings/emotions?!?!? Why in the world would anyone want to do that? A guy who wants complete devoid-of-emotion encounters is best served by seeing a new lady each time. The whole point about crossing the fuzzy boundary from a date with an escort to a more free-form SB/SD relationship is, I believe, ultimately a matter of injecting MORE real chemistry/connection/feelings, not less. There is certainly a lot of room to discuss the specifics—how much, what are acceptable degrees of connection, boundaries, duration of the relationship, etc., etc. However to argue there should be an absence of feelings and instead ALL about the money confuses what we are talking about.
You sound like you want some reliable, frequent clients who provide a lot of extras for you, but without you providing the corresponding “extras”. Nothing wrong with that if you can get it, and I am sure some guys are looking for the same thing, but generally that is not what the SB/SD discussions refer to.
Originally Posted by Old-T
I have to backup Old-T. There is a sugar daddy forum on these boards for ECCIE's SDs, and there is a lot of discussion to help new potential SDs agree upon what a SB and what an SD really are. There is a lot of variation on whether SDs provide financial assistance, just gifts, life experiences, or a combination of all of the above. But one thing is crystal clear: An SB is somewhere between a provider and a GF. No SD would enter an agreement with a girl that wants to have less emotion and more flexibility than a provider. The vast majority of SDs even require monogamy as part of the deal from their babies, although a few don't.
That being said, the agreements often are NSA. Emotions develop, sure. That's natural. But if the SD wanted the SB as a GF, she'd be the GF.