ATTN Providers – Most Hobbyists Hate Tattoos

some do and some don't. I likem all

My reviews often comment that I have pretty tattoos so maybe consider that some of us had pretty ones before, will have pretty ones after, and would never, ever let a client make any decisions about our appearance.

My reviews often comment that I have pretty tattoos so maybe consider that some of us had pretty ones before, will have pretty ones after, and would never, ever let a client make any decisions about our appearance. Originally Posted by SillyGirl

I agree. Tattoos are a form of self-expression, like the choice of hair style/color, nail, scent, etc. I would rather see the honest expression of the individual, versus an actress catering to her client's desires.

As you can probably guess, I love ink on a girl. Whenever I notice ink on the first session, that just gives me an excuse to explore

I suppose the tattoo itself matters. Finding another dude's name would be disturbing. Thankfully, I haven't seen that yet

+1 Graycoat.

My clients find my tattoos beautiful pieces of art work. Especially the one tattoo that comes as a surprise when my guy is exploring.

If the girl is hot and she has tattoo's I don't think that will matter much. I don't havve any myself but there are some that are very tactfully done and look good. Others... not so much.

It all depends on the woman. I have a couple ATFs and one has a bunch of tats, and the other does not. So having tats or not is low on my priority list of things that make me decide on a provider. Now if the tats are ghetto, or poorly done, that could be a turnoff for me. Not into the neck tats or tats across the front of the chest.

NinaSastri is the only girl I know with great looking/fitting tats. IMO most women shouldn't have gotten them in the first place. I know a provider that uses tattoos to cover her stretch marks. It's pretty funny. Imagine what those look like! I don't have tats but I do know ladies that do well with them. Different strokes for different folks!

+1


I don't mind at all.

It's the woman I'm fucking...not her tattoos. Originally Posted by john353

Thank you John.

It only matters when I'm in the mood to see a lady with a lot of ink/metal. That happens occasionally, but is not a big factor in regular selection criteria. There are other priorities.

an honest question for the guys ...

you are looking for a companion to take to an upscale social event, Black Tie/Little Black Dress.

Would you pick a girl with full sleeve/legging ink or a girl with no ink?

Unless there is so many that it is distracting they dont bother me one way or another and some i find quite interesting.
If anything distracts me from a womans natural beauty its piercings or tattoos on the face....the rest of the body ..doesnt bother me at all .

an honest question for the guys ...

you are looking for a companion to take to an upscale social event, Black Tie/Little Black Dress.

Would you pick a girl with full sleeve/legging ink or a girl with no ink? Originally Posted by CJ7

IDT it matters much anymore. Look at Angelina Jolie.

IDT it matters much anymore. Look at Angelina Jolie. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

Ok, I'll give Angie $200 for a session

an observation;

the very upscale low volume (high class, if you will) providers who have rates exceeding $1000 for social events dont wear any ink.

sans a discreet tat below the belt, front or back, or a small tat above a breast, ink in general takes away form the overall feminine look that I prefer. A great deal of the stigma attached to tats is a generation gap. Most recently gangs and prison time entered that stigma.

If the girl is hot and she has tattoo's I don't think that will matter much. I don't havve any myself but there are some that are very tactfully done and look good. Others... not so much. Originally Posted by Shayla

I just checked out Shayla's photos on her profile. In my humble opinion, her body is itself such a beautiful work of art - all clean, natural and sexy. I can't see it being improved on with ink. I only wish she were in Dallas!

You can't speak for other hobbyists, let alone most men period. Unless you have some stats to back up your claims?

There was a thread about tattoos not that long ago. The outcome is going to be the same again. Your descriptions of what a lady with tattoos looks like according to "mens" opinions is laughable. You do realize that ladies can look ghetto, trailerpark trashy and whatever you said without tattoos?

And yes, I have tattoos.....I don't like them, I LOVE them, they do hold special meanings to me and I do NOT have to cut my rate because of them. Oh and I'm working on my PhD right now with a 4.0 GPA. Stick that in your stereotyping pipe and smoke it.

Why in hell am I justifying my life and my tattoos to you? Someone smack my ass really hard to wake me up. Originally Posted by MsElena

You are reading more into my post than is actually there, but that's okay. Just an observation: I read a few of your recent reviews to see what comments there were about your tattoos, and the first 2 that mentioned them said "She has a few tattoos BUT are nicely done." and ". . . various tattoos including wrist, back, upper leg, BUT nothing distasteful." Why do you think reviewers almost always include a "but"?