Jennifer Teen- No Show- Waste of my Time

... It would have been so easy to just pick up the phone and answer when I called ... Originally Posted by Teddybear53

Have you considered that the "voice" you were texting with wasn't her's?

Probably not, the butthurt cannot thinck straight ...

she did the same to me a few weeks ago....welcome to houston

Sorry dude. Lots of flakes on this board, unfortunately.

Probably not, the butthurt cannot thinck straight ... Originally Posted by pyramider

It was her phone. She didn't answer it because she "didn't feel good". She flaked. The end.

^^^^you believe that bro?

Usually text only providers have a "handler" or google voice. Everyone I've met who's used google voice were very straight up about it.

Now she claims to have left a little after five because she didn't feel good. Fine. Just be honest. I was still in the lobby at that time, so it is pretty clear she had no intention of fulfilling our appointment of 4:30. Originally Posted by Teddybear53

Yep, unprofessional.

Also,

White Knight 1 = JY

White Knight 2 = 4sides

She is quite the pretty little thing - probably been getting away with shit like this for a long time.

Yes its frustrating but dont dwell on it and just move on
She is not losing sleep or business over this
Texas johns love their Little Leaguer looking spinners

Yep, unprofessional.

Also,

White Knight 1 = JY

White Knight 2 = 4sides Originally Posted by Sarunga

Suggesting a provider might be pimped earns one WK #1 status in your book?

Or do you find nuance confusing?

Suggesting a provider might be pimped earns one WK #1 status in your book? Originally Posted by White Night 1

Nope, attempting to deflect the blame from the said provider earned you that status.

Nope, attempting to deflect the blame from the said provider earned you that status. Originally Posted by Sarunga

The words on the (electronic) page can be interpreted for meaning quite easily, if the writing is exact and the interpreter has skill.

But attempting to infer the intent of the author who wrote the words is a fool's errand, which is why it is not endeavored in Literary Criticism.

Your bias is seeping through. Must have something to do with the provider because I don't believe we've ever exchanged words here before. And I have zero interest in her or you.

Focus on your own intentions, which are knowable should you possess sufficient courage, and you will be better for it. Or maybe you'll end up killing yourself. But presumably that would be honest action.

Suggesting a provider might be pimped earns one WK #1 status in your book?

Or do you find nuance confusing? Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Why not? I got wked because the OP's butthurtness is affecting his thincking... Also, consider the source. ...

Text only should be your first clue.

The words on the (electronic) page can be interpreted for meaning quite easily, if the writing is exact and the interpreter has skill.

But attempting to infer the intent of the author who wrote the words is a fool's errand, which is why it is not endeavored in Literary Criticism.

Your bias is seeping through. Must have something to do with the provider because I don't believe we've ever exchanged words here before. And I have zero interest in her or you.

Focus on your own intentions, which are knowable should you possess sufficient courage, and you will be better for it. Or maybe you'll end up killing yourself. But presumably that would be honest action. Originally Posted by White Night 1

You should practice what you preach.

You say you have zero interest in her, and yet you felt the need to chime in with this:

Have you considered that the "voice" you were texting with wasn't her's? Originally Posted by White Night 1

BTW, we have exchanged words here before....which has always been in fun...and sometimes enlightening....in understanding human nature.

In this case, for example, the profound lengths one would go to hide his exposed butt.