heh!
Maybe the ladies should be able to review the gents."Embellished reviews"?
Not necessarily a full review of the session but maybe something along the lines of giving OK's like on p411 as well as NO's if we wouldn't see the guy again or even NCNS.
I also agree that NCNS should be somehow left as a review, since there was some kind of activities even though not BCD. Or somehow attached to a profile
As much as I agree that it would be nice to read what is written in the ROS of reviews. I'm sure that many of us ladies would want to correct things if we see things that we don't agree with. And if we get a negative review, we would probably want to react. Would the lady end up posting something in co-ed or infoshare to try to say their side of things if they get a bad review?
How many guys embellish things in reviews to make themselves look good? How many reviews are understated? How many are just the facts? How many are written like a book? What kinds of things would be left out or added if guys knew that the ladies could read it? Are the reviews accurate now or would they be more accurate if the ladies could read them? Originally Posted by TemptationTammie
(gasps!)
I tend to agree, to a point. For whatever the reason, embellishment, after-glow, collaboration, puffery, fuckery, or whatever, I'm always a little skeptical as to what comes after the "Activities" area in a review....so much so that I've pretty-much given up on reading them. With a few exceptions, I tend to take whatever is conveyed with a Texas-sized grain of salt.
In my warped and simple, little mind, I tend to believe that the accuracy of a review has a negative correlation to the size of the audience it's being broadcast.
The only true, real, and quality, intel can only be acquired through carefully cultivated and trusted friendships, aka, 'back channel'. Anything else is just rolling the bones.
-As far as providers reviewing mongers and what not....
Providers are allowed to reviews mongers. I know this to be an absolute fact. (don't ask me how I know, lol...I just do).
But if you're looking to post a review about a problem client, don't you thinck that would be best served posting that in an area already available to the providers; "The Powder Room/ Infoshare", or whatever it's called?
The only benefit I could see in posting it publicly, (as opposed to privately; as it is now), would be so that the monger would be allowed to refute, or answer to whatever claims were lodged against him.
But just like if providers were allowed to comment on their reviews, the ensuing fallout isn't worth the added effort. The potential 'noise factor' is just too great.
Solution?Ding! Ding! Ding!
Ladies just keep up your A game and you'll have no reason to care about ROS.
Men treat your ladies right and you'll have no reason to be concerned about what is being shared between the providers. Originally Posted by Windinhishair
Johnny, tell him what he's won!
.
.
