SUPREME Hypocrites

Give me a break. Roberts, Alito, and Gorsuch were all confirmed without any allegations. Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

Funny how you neglected to mention Kavanaugh or Amy Coney Barrett. I guess that means even you agree that the idiotic libtards made a bunch of baseless accusations against them, including dragging loony tunes out of the woodwork to just make up crazy shit

Funny how you neglected to mention Kavanaugh or Amy Coney Barrett. I guess that means even you agree that the idiotic libtards made a bunch of baseless accusations against them, including dragging loony tunes out of the woodwork to just make up crazy shit Originally Posted by berryberry

Ummmm... I was replying to a comment that dems attack every every R male nominee with false SA allegations so I gave examples of those who were not, which included basically every other R male nominee since Thomas. Not everyone's the victim of some big liberal conspiracy.

Now what is actually funny is that you mention ACB when we're talking about male nominees. Weren't you just complaining about the definition of woman being the most pressing issue for a supreme court nominee?

... What's a woman?

### Salty

Ummmm... I was replying to a comment that dems attack every every R male nominee with false SA allegations so I gave examples of those who were not, which included basically every other R male nominee since Thomas. Not everyone's the victim of some big liberal conspiracy.

Now what is actually funny is that you mention ACB when we're talking about male nominees. Weren't you just complaining about the definition of woman being the most pressing issue for a supreme court nominee? Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

You are deflecting. You know the libtards went batshit crazy attacking Kavanaugh and ACB with false silly accusations. And yes Devo mentioned male nominees but he also mentioned ACB

So the last 2 nominees by President Trump were flamed, and falsely accused with batshit crazy made up stories by the libtards

You are deflecting. You know the libtards went batshit crazy attacking Kavanaugh and ACB with false silly accusations. And yes Devo mentioned male nominees but he also mentioned ACB

So the last 2 nominees by President Trump were flamed, and falsely accused with batshit crazy made up stories by the libtards Originally Posted by berryberry

So addressing the specific comments made is deflecting? Whatever. And yes Devo did mention ACB... in a sentenced which referenced a hypothetical gang bang. Was I actually supposed to take that seriously?

I didn't even come here to make a point about Trump's nominees. I generally agree that the confirmation process now is a politicized circus. However, my initial response was to RBG being thrown into this conversation for some reason, which I still find preposterous.

So addressing the specific comments made is deflecting? Whatever. And yes Devo did mention ACB... in a sentenced which referenced a hypothetical gang bang. Was I actually supposed to take that seriously?
Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

Did you take the gang bang / other ridiculous rape accusations against Kavanaugh seriously? You can't separate one from the other. That was the whole point

And these are the type of dishonest evil fucks we have in the media. Tarring and feathering these disgustingly dishonest vile media members would be too good for them



"It's worse to ask someone legitimate questions about her judicial record than to try to utterly destroy the life of a man based on scurrilous allegations we know have no basis." Evil evil evil. EVIL.

Did you take the gang bang / other ridiculous rape accusations against Kavanaugh seriously? You can't separate one from the other. That was the whole point Originally Posted by berryberry

... sigh, I never tried to separate those. Again, I was addressing the inclusion of RBG in this whole discussion and then the claim that ALL R nominees faced outlandish accusations.

... sigh, I never tried to separate those. Again, I was addressing the inclusion of RBG in this whole discussion and then the claim that ALL R nominees faced outlandish accusations. Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

Your intent was clear enough, some folks just need an axe to grind

... sigh, I never tried to separate those. Again, I was addressing the inclusion of RBG in this whole discussion and then the claim that ALL R nominees faced outlandish accusations. Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

No - you made this statement - your can't run from your own words

And yes Devo did mention ACB... in a sentenced which referenced a hypothetical gang bang. Was I actually supposed to take that seriously?
. Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

Both of the last two R nominees faced outlandish made up accusations from the left. Why are you dismissing that?

No - you made this statement - your can't run from your own words

Both of the last two R nominees faced outlandish made up accusations from the left. Why are you dismissing that? Originally Posted by berryberry

So you're still on me not taking that ridiculous hypothetical seriously? I mean it seemed quite clearly to be a joke.

And for the last time, I never dismissed a single claim about the last two R nominees. I mean you can keep saying I did though if you wanna

So you're still on me not taking that ridiculous hypothetical seriously? I mean it seemed quite clearly to be a joke. Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

That which you call a "ridiculous hypothetical" was an actual claim levied by the libtards against one of the last 2 R nominees

That which you call a "ridiculous hypothetical" was an actual claim levied by the libtards against one of the last 2 R nominees Originally Posted by berryberry

The claim was that Kavanaugh was doing the GBing. The hypothetical listed in this thread was that ACB was gangbanged by a high school basketball team. Those aren't exactly the same (you know receiving vs giving). I found it funny because it honestly sounded like the premise of barely legal porno.

The claim was that Kavanaugh was doing the GBing. The hypothetical listed in this thread was that ACB was gangbanged by a high school basketball team. Those aren't exactly the same (you know receiving vs giving). I found it funny because it honestly sounded like the premise of barely legal porno. Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

So cool - you admit one claim actually happened. Yet you try to dismiss what Devo wrote as a "ridiculous hypothetical" as something that could not be taken seriously. Clearly if the libtards made the claim once, its not a stretch to think they wouldn't do so again. That's the whole point - that libtards have made utterly baseless accusations against R nominees

We need a jump to conclusions mat to go under the grinder. That might be your point, but goddamn if every perceived sleight is an assault upon the core of your beliefs and a future affront to get pre-pissed off about.