Sure . . .there is always an excuse. "He doesn't work here, and the new guy didn't know." is convenient. So who is in charge of this loose operation?
More convenient excuses: The roof was too step. The local LE had responsibility for . . .The FBI can't figure out who brought in the Cocaine . . . or why the MKL bullet doesn't match the gun. . . .nor can they break into the five or so cell phones recovered from the attempted Trump shooters.
That nothing bad happened (we are told, the election is not over yet) does not itself mitigate the error nor does it excuse or forgive it. If former President Trump had not merely his head this would be a different discussion.
Do not confuse the multiple examples with a change of topic. These things are all connected in terms of responsibility, fault, culpability, consequences and accountability.
Originally Posted by ICU 812
Humans are fallible. Systems that incorporate humans are fallible. Computers and software that are designed, built and operated by humans are fallible.
When problems arise and are found the solution is to stop and think about the problem and to fix not just the issue but the underlying culture that allowed the problem to occur in the first place. If you want to call for change that’s the way to do things.
Conflation of problems between different entities is invalid unless a common cause exists and suspicion is not proof of anything.
It sounds to me like what we’re discussing here in this thread is an unhealthy distrust of government institutions. Federal, State, and Local.
I think what people don’t want to understand is that local and state governments are numerous and under the control of many different individuals and groups that have only a minimal connection to one party or the other. The idea that there is some kind of overall consensus or control between them is simply not credible.