BENGHAZI - Some of you Teapublicans need to STFU

You fuckers look so silly jeesh...
Geesh! The fucking deaths are shown in the link I provided, Morons!

The first link as a matter of fact:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrori...tic_facilities

No wonder you LIVS can't even pick the best Presidential candidate!

Hint: Scroll to the RIGHT HAND COLUMN and look for the heading "Deaths", you stooooopid fuckers.


I can't find any either Originally Posted by LovingKayla


still cannot find where any Americans died, as I said "it is the cover up" that is why Fox keeps covering it Originally Posted by cptjohnstone
you are like my former donkey friend who would leave the room when I turned Fox on, hell they have a donkey on the show from 4 till 5:30pm. You are just a closed minded SOB Originally Posted by cptjohnstone
How many times do idiots have to be shown? So now you've got the 11/12 thing cleared up and the deaths. Can you not just admit you are wrong and MOVE THE FUCK ALONG?

Fox "News" can't even get a broadcast license in Canada because of their blatant dishonesty.

They distort - you believe.

DOH
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
What about my question, Stevie?
What about my question, Stevie? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Yours was a hypothetical and unproven STATEMENT phrased as a question in your usual lying style, COF.

You get nothing but scorn from here, pal.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 11-03-2012, 02:23 AM
In which of the attacks under Bush were the cries for help met with "Stand down" three times? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
you refuse to pay attention ... Fox cited an unnamed source? imagine that.

I digress ...

A senior U.S. intelligence official emphatically denied that the CIA refused repeated requests from its officers on the ground in Benghazi, Libya, to assist the Americans under attack at the U.S. mission there.

Just five days before the presidential election and in a rare briefing to reporters, the official Thursday offered almost a minute-by-minute account of what happened that night.

According to a Fox News report last Friday, citing an unnamed source, CIA officers working at an annex about a mile from the mission were told by officials in the CIA chain of command to "stand down" after receiving a call from the mission asking for help.

"There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support," the senior intelligence official said, offering a passionate defense of the actions taken by the CIA officers on the ground during the September 11 attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

The official insisted the agency operators at the annex were in charge of their movements and the safety of those who were preparing to respond to the initial attack on the mission compound.

There was "no second guessing" their decisions, the official said
you refuse to pay attention ... Fox cited an unnamed source? imagine that. Originally Posted by CJ7

Thanks for going through the exercise of explaining things for COF, however, his behavior and continual lying on this board make him overwhelmingly undeserving of such.

He will continue to use obscure sources and ignore plausible ones.
NiceGuy53's Avatar
you refuse to pay attention ... Fox cited an unnamed source? imagine that.

I digress ...

A senior U.S. intelligence official emphatically denied that the CIA refused repeated requests from its officers on the ground in Benghazi, Libya, to assist the Americans under attack at the U.S. mission there.

Just five days before the presidential election and in a rare briefing to reporters, the official Thursday offered almost a minute-by-minute account of what happened that night.

According to a Fox News report last Friday, citing an unnamed source, CIA officers working at an annex about a mile from the mission were told by officials in the CIA chain of command to "stand down" after receiving a call from the mission asking for help.

"There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support," the senior intelligence official said, offering a passionate defense of the actions taken by the CIA officers on the ground during the September 11 attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

The official insisted the agency operators at the annex were in charge of their movements and the safety of those who were preparing to respond to the initial attack on the mission compound.

There was "no second guessing" their decisions, the official said Originally Posted by CJ7
So you criticize Fox News for using an unnamed source but you turn around and do the same thing. Where is the name of the "senior intelligence official"?
LexusLover's Avatar
General Ham was a named source.

He was replaced for "sourcing."

When will you wimps stop citing Bush ....

.... as an excuse for Obaminable failures?

That was a rhetorical question .. I know the answer.
Randy4Candy's Avatar
Hmmm, you klowns (and klownette) are hilarious. This embassy back and forth is getting nowhere because none of the Tea Parrotriots can "find" where any died.

Well, how about this.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Be...rracks_bombing

and the Great Hero, Ronnie, did absolutely not one fu*king thing.

You people are just plain, fuc*ing stupid.
Well, how about this.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Be...rracks_bombing

and the Great Hero, Ronnie, did absolutely not one fu*king thing. Originally Posted by Randy4Candy
Yes they did, the forefathers of today's Teapublicans blamed it on Jimmy Carter.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Cite where you obtained your bogus BS from, Little Blind Boy! Cite where an ambassador was killed, Little Blind Boy!


From:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_A...ng_in_Istanbul

There were no casualties in the attack apart from the three attackers and three police officers. In response to the attack, the US temporarily increased security at all of its Turkish diplomatic missions.

The unsuccessful attack showed that the (new) consulate grounds were safe for the American diplomatic staff.


What did Odumbo do when the U.S. consulate in Libya was bombed in April and again in June? He reduced security!



From:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_A...ttack_in_Yemen

" . . . no Americans working at the embassy were injured or harmed during the attack."



Hyperlink from:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrori...tic_facilities

The 1998 United States embassy bombings were a series of attacks that occurred on August 7, 1998, in which hundreds of people were killed in simultaneous truck bomb explosions at the United States embassies in the East African capitals of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. The date of the bombings marked the eighth anniversary of the arrival of American forces in Saudi Arabia. The attacks were linked to local members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, brought Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri to the attention of the American public for the first time, and resulted in the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation placing bin Laden on its Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list.

On August 7, between 10:30 am and 10:40 am local time (3:30–3:40 am Washington time), suicide bombers in trucks laden with explosives parked outside the embassies in Dar es Salaam and Nairobi, and almost simultaneously detonated. In Nairobi, approximately 212 people were killed, and an estimated 4,000 wounded; in Dar es Salaam, the attack killed at least 11 and wounded 85. . . Although the attacks were directed at American facilities, the vast majority of casualties were local citizens; 12 Americans were killed, including two Central Intelligence Agency employees in the Nairobi embassy, Tom Shah and Molly Huckaby Hardy, and one Marine, Sergeant Jesse Aliganga, a Marine Security Guard at the Nairobi embassy.

In response to the bombings, President Bill Clinton ordered Operation Infinite Reach, a series of cruise missile strikes on targets in Sudan and Afghanistan on August 20, 1998, announcing the planned strike in a prime time address on American television.

In Sudan, the missiles destroyed the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory, where 50% of Sudan's medications for both people and animals were manufactured. The Clinton administration claimed that there was ample evidence to prove that the plant produced chemical weapons, but a thorough investigation after the missile strikes revealed that the intelligence was false.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_United_States_embassy_bom bings

Pssst!!! Slick Willie MISSED dealing with bin Laden!!!! Other than that, your links prove absolutely shit Little Blind Boy.


CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 11-03-2012, 10:14 AM
So you criticize Fox News for using an unnamed source but you turn around and do the same thing. Where is the name of the "senior intelligence official"? Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

Fox reported ..

CIA operators on the scene repeatedly transmitted requests for military backup but were denied by U.S. officials. Not only that but the CIA operatives were also told twice to "stand down" rather than assist U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens after shots were heard at about 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11


Jennifer Youngblood, CIA spokesperson says Fox is as full of shit as you are ...

Jennifer Youngblood, a spokesperson for the CIA, today denied claims that repeated requests for military support during the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi were turned down:
No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. In fact, it is important to remember how many lives were saved by courageous Americans who put their own safety at risk that night — and that some of those selfless Americans gave their lives in the effort to rescue their comrades.
JB: With regard to Benghazi, Obama's actions can best be described as indifference, not incompetence (IMO).

But no doubt, the over-arching failures of the Obama presidency will historically be called "incompetence."
Yssup Rider's Avatar
History will tell, Twirly. Of course, here in Texas, the textbooks won't mention that America ever had a black sheriff, er, President! So it really doesn't matter.

That said, I think historically we'll look back on this post war era as a long, hard but ultimately successful rebuilding of the American nation.
NiceGuy53's Avatar
Fox reported ..

CIA operators on the scene repeatedly transmitted requests for military backup but were denied by U.S. officials. Not only that but the CIA operatives were also told twice to "stand down" rather than assist U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens after shots were heard at about 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11


Jennifer Youngblood, CIA spokesperson says Fox is as full of shit as you are ...

Jennifer Youngblood, a spokesperson for the CIA, today denied claims that repeated requests for military support during the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi were turned down:
No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. In fact, it is important to remember how many lives were saved by courageous Americans who put their own safety at risk that night — and that some of those selfless Americans gave their lives in the effort to rescue their comrades.
Originally Posted by CJ7
You think you are so clever that no one would catch what you just did. Well, you thought wrong. In your previous post you quoted from (without properly citing) a CNN online report, dated 11/1/12, entitled "Intelligence Official Offers New Timeline for Benghazi Attack". In this CNN report, they used as their source an unnamed "senior intelligence official" to dispute the Fox News report, which used multiple unnamed sources on the ground in Benghazi. You were not quoting from a previous statement from the CIA spokesperson, that was issued on 10/26/12. To now claim that you were is a blatant lie and you know it. I have cited the link from the CNN report, so you and everyone else can see what you did. http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/1...nghazi-attack/

The CIA spokesperson did say that the CIA did not tell anyone to stand down (and I am paraphrasing here). General Petraeus also said, on 10/26/12, "no one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need". I have no reason at this point to doubt an honorable man like Gen. Petraeus. But the boots on the ground in Benghazi say they were told to stand down several times. If the order to stand down did not originate from the CIA director then it had to originate from someone in the White House or another senior administration official. So, who do you believe here? The boots on the ground in Benghazi or some political hack in the Obama administration. Obama and his team have been lying to us from day one about what happened in Benghazi.

Just to emphasize here. I asked you to name the "senior intelligence official" you quoted in your original post. You could not do so because this official was unnamed. Instead you come back with the name of the CIA spokesperson, who said the CIA did not tell anyone to stand down. And that is not what I asked you jack. You know on second thought, I doubt that you even realized what you were doing. You are such a dumbass, CBJ7.