Justice Ginsburn schools her conservative colleagues . . .

Was segregation a social norm? Not really whereas the definition of marriage was a norm. For you racists (that means dems) most segregation was a government policy. Black and white people were fucking long before some democrat decided a law was needed against miscegenation. Blacks and whites served in the armed forces before some democrat general decided that darker skin tones clashed with the uniform. Of course the latest segregationists are black progressives.

A nice Jewish girl...could probably suck a mean dick. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Yuuup, bet so, too.

But (word has it) don't put a "ring on it". The day they walk down the aisle is the usually the final time they perform that little "chore".....so I'm told.

If 73% of the country was for segregation, would that be acceptable? How about just in the military? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

It worked during WWII
and the black man was still able show what he was capable of

Agreed but when one person (or city state) has the upper hand then perhaps the "mercy" of arbitration is the only thing that you have left. It may not be fair,depending on your point of view, but a company could fire everyone, lock the gates and shut down the company indefinitely, or a city state could just kill everyone. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

If the city state is going to kill everyone I hope they start with the liberals....

It worked during WWII
and the black man was still able show what he was capable of . . .

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

. . . Voting?


https://www.history.com/topics/black...ing-rights-act

Exploited for combat infantry. But heaven (or the "opulent few") forbid they have the right to vote.

Was segregation a social norm? Not really whereas the definition of marriage was a norm. For you racists (that means dems) most segregation was a government policy. Black and white people were fucking long before some democrat decided a law was needed against miscegenation. Blacks and whites served in the armed forces before some democrat general decided that darker skin tones clashed with the uniform. Of course the latest segregationists are black progressives. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Does the word marriage appear anywhere in the Constitution?

If 73% of the country was for segregation, would that be acceptable? How about just in the military? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

It depends on who they are segregating.

Does the word marriage appear anywhere in the Constitution?

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

No it doesn't. Thats why you don't have a right to get married. It's a privilege just like driving. You fail the test you don't get a Drivers License. You fail to attract the Girl/Guy you don't get married. It's simple mathematics.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-jo...-rights-racism

CF, Lady Bird Johnson and her plantation home.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-jo...-rights-racism

CF, Lady Bird Johnson and her plantation home. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I didn't know LBJ was such a fucking racist motherfucker!

Yuuup, bet so, too.

But (word has it) don't put a "ring on it". The day they walk down the aisle is the usually the final time they perform that little "chore".....so I'm told. Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

That's funny CB. Im still waiting on the Jewish pussy that was promised to me

That's funny CB. Im still waiting on the Jewish pussy that was promised to me Originally Posted by themystic

What the fuck is wrong with you? Isn't RBG Jewish enough?

NoOne promised any Jewish pussy to AnyOne - particularly Anti-Semite racists
Off topic - and self -centered as usual
Back on topic- RBG's politics.
Difficult for the self-entitled DPST's!

. . . on the meaning of the word ‘consent’

"The notion that consent achieved through coercion is no consent at all should not be a difficult concept for five of the most powerful lawyers in the country to understand. And yet this notion escapes all five of the Supreme Court’s Republicans." Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

^^^ Your OP juxtaposition makes it look like the quote is from Ginsburg's dissenting opinion. It's not.

She would never refer to her fellow SCOTUS justices as "Republicans" or "Democrats". Only an imbecile writing for a left-wing whacko ragsheet called "Think Progress" would do that!

Here is another lulu of a stupid quote from your same author:

"If workers 'consent' to forced arbitration, it is the consent of jus primae noctis. It is the consent of a conquered nation that, having seen its armies vanquished, agrees to be ruled by a foreign king. It is the consent of a man who agrees to give up his wallet at gunpoint."

This follows an exhibit showing the obscene amounts tort lawyers have managed to extort, on average, from the wallets of companies by dragging them into court and pointing a legal gun at their heads. Agreeing to binding arbitration means the greedy tort lawyers won't be able to extort as much money from those company wallets. Nobody is taking money out of employees' wallets. Only a fucking lying jackass shill for the tort bar would even dare to suggest that when it's the other way around!


Does the OP feel "coerced" into consenting to the Terms of Service each time he logs onto eccie? Why not make a federal case out of that?


Nobody I know takes a job intending to sue their employer. If you don't like binding arbitration, then don't take the job. If you want to enrich greedy, rapacious, vulturous tort lawyers who contibute nothing to the nation's productive economy, then go to law school and study how to become an ambulance-chasing thief.