Assumptions from Lack of Reviews--A Different Perspective

Is that your preference (not having a lot of reviews written) or just by happenstance? Originally Posted by BigMikeinKC

I see a lot of UTR guys that don't post at all. The ones that do ask, I tell them it's not necessary unless they feel the need to post one.

I agree with Big Deal,a bit of a double standard about clients with "too many reviews". That being said,I now feel like a real slut knowing that I have more okays than he does. I'm off now to bathe with Clorox and my wire grill brush.

The only "too many" that I would question is someone trying to use 18 BP girl reviews as references when you can't verify the women.

I agree with Big Deal,a bit of a double standard about clients with "too many reviews". That being said,I now feel like a real slut knowing that I have more okays than he does. I'm off now to bathe with Clorox and my wire grill brush. Originally Posted by Fastcar

Why not delete some of the OK's if you've exceeded the number that's "too many"...what ever that number is?

Because it is way worse if we catch you lying to us.

Because it is way worse if we catch you lying to us. Originally Posted by SillyGirl

Let's say I have 10 OK's and I delete one, why is that a lie? I deleted an OK a few weeks ago because the OK was from a provider who recently retired; I never considered it to be a lie?

Were you lying? Then no, not a lie.


Trying to hide your activity? Yes, that is a lie.

No lady will ever say be more detailed in your review, tell everything play by play." lol Men seem to enjoy doing that as well as reading...if you wanna know so bad schedule some time lol Originally Posted by Busty Mary

I'm going to go ahead and disagree with you there. Not every woman has a hang up about such things. In fact I had one lament about the "sameness/lameness" of the reviews guys write saying, "I wish they were more creative in their writing and more descriptive." So the next time I wrote one for her, I got as descriptive and creative as possible.

Its all a matter of TRUST. There are a handful of guys (and gals) that I trust on here. If a lady has reviews on here and none of the reviewers are people that I know I can trust, my decision to she her is not based on those reviews. I would need to verify that she is legit from another source. AND if after I do my verification, call the provider and she doesn't screen properly - then its a no go.

Now that is when my big head is doing the thinking. I'll admit that it has happened (usually after a few belts) that my little head does the thinking and so far I have been very lucky when that happens.

Were you lying? Then no, not a lie.

Trying to hide your activity? Yes, that is a lie. Originally Posted by SillyGirl

"Not a Lie" Yes, if he did not tell an untruth.

Not telling you something? Why do you want to know? Maybe someone thinks the information is not germane to the relationship (you can read that as none of your business).

Some relationships are private and discrete.

JR

Dude it would have been immensely helpful if you had actually read the thread. If you are hiding your activity to see a woman that does not see high volume clients, you are lying. That is not discretion, that is calculated deception. (see post #19, which is the exchange my comment was about).

The "not a lie" was referring to removing a retired, uncontactable Okay from your profile.

If you genuinely do not see the difference I am greatly concerned for your ethics.