I just wonder about the ladies with no coverage. Originally Posted by sofiaofhouston
I just thought I throw this out maybe it can help someone who can't afford insurance, there is a government plan called the "Gold Card", I think anyone can apply and get it but the determination of free to paying something depends on a persons income, usually people get 100% and that gives them complete free coverage by the state for any kind of treatment they might need. Originally Posted by auknowhoSo if this is the case then why are American politicians bickering about health care...?
So if this is the case then why are American politicians bickering about health care...?
This confuses me.....We always had to buy our health care. Not a problem, it's just a requirement in this industry. Not having it is foolish in this industry. I have a hard time understanding how some people have gone by without coverage when the estimated numbers are shown. Estimates show as many as 15% of Americans are uninsured.
So what you are saying is that.....
Who else is left? Where are all 15% of uninsured hiding? This is hard to understand when many countries even offer health care to tourist and long term residence.
- The homeless veteran under the freeway is covered under Veterans Health Administration, the homeless
- The indigent have this "gold plan"
- The rest of us buy our health care..
It's very interesting to see how this politico health care will play out... Originally Posted by sofiaofhouston
You could try the Lil Red Robbin solution... uh... hope you look good in green.... Originally Posted by ThatManFromTexasIsn't desert tan the "new" green?
The health care debate is not about covering all Americans. It is about Government control and intrusion into our private lives and individual liberties. Originally Posted by boardmanNow I understand this issue. Then they should keep at it for a while...How long can we draw this out.....?
The health care debate is not about covering all Americans. It is about Government control and intrusion into our private lives and individual liberties. Originally Posted by boardmanI'm sorry, I just don't buy that line anymore. It's just a hot button from some old political talking points list. America needs to quit denying this problem and fix it.
So if this is the case then why are American politicians bickering about health care...?Sofia I don't know what you are talking about and why would you quote me on this? I put that out for people who need help can get it? Are we on a different page here? Regarding homeless vets or whomever is another debate, you might want to start another thread for it, i thought this was about providers and health "insurance".
This confuses me.....We always had to buy our health care. Not a problem, it's just a requirement in this industry. Not having it is foolish in this industry. I have a hard time understanding how some people have gone by without coverage when the estimated numbers are shown. Estimates show as many as 15% of Americans are uninsured.
So what you are saying is that.....
Who else is left? Where are all 15% of uninsured hiding? This is hard to understand when many countries even offer health care to tourist and long term residence.
- The homeless veteran under the freeway is covered under Veterans Health Administration, the homeless
- The indigent have this "gold plan"
- The rest of us buy our health care..
It's very interesting to see how this politico health care will play out... Originally Posted by sofiaofhouston
Sofia I don't know what you are talking about and why would you quote me on this? I put that out for people who need help can get it? Are we on a different page here? Regarding homeless vets or whomever is another debate, you might want to start another thread for it, i thought this was about providers and health "insurance". Originally Posted by auknowhoIt is.
I'm sorry, I just don't buy that line anymore. It's just a hot button from some old political talking points list. America needs to quit denying this problem and fix it.TC, I agree with you that it needs to be fixed. We may or may not have a philosophical difference about how that should happen. I don't understand why calling it a talking point automatically invalidates an otherwise legitimate idea. For that matter "talking points" has become a hot button.
TopCat Originally Posted by topcat19542001