Encounter: Encounter with the Starfish

So, what’s the verdict? Guilty or not? Seems like a hung jury.

This could be real. Rachel’s ads are practically illegible. At least he I can understand what he’s saying.

The ad is real, this review is not real. It is just the ad leaking into this site.

Now I'm skeptical about this review. First you said this was your first time ever doing anything like this and you were nervous. Then you say "...but compared to some people from my past wasn't horrible." Either this was your first time or it wasn't. The more this review gets defended, the more it doesn't pass the sniff test. Originally Posted by Typo

I think you are trying to read to far into this. Yes this is the 1st time I ever went online comped someone for their time. This was far from my 1st time ever having sex. To put it out there I was in a long term thing for years and am in no place to just go out and ruin someone so I tried doing the responsible thing. Can't get ya feelings hurt if it's just about business

so wait, back up. First review is a for a girl who gets more no's than yes's, and is for a girl who supposedly retired a month or two ago??? I'm selling a bridge downtown perhaps you would like to purchase it? Originally Posted by paintedbynumbers

Not just "his" first review ever but "his" first post ever on the exact same day "he" first joins the site. Please. We have seen this type of BS before

A possible explanation for the difference in grammar and spelling could be that it’s the person who does her texting and scheduling?

Maybe business wouldn’t be so bad if the ad wasn’t so demanding in the first place. I was going to check her out till I read the ad wanted an exact time and shit in the opening text. Didn’t seem nearly worth the hassle/annoyance so I passed for more flexible and friendly providers