Contrary to what everyone seems to be saying, I could make an argument that it was, in fact, the wrong call. (Does this surprise anyone?)You going to make a point or just say what you could do and do nothing?
I could also make the argument that even if it was technically correct according to the letter of the rule, it was still a bad call under the circumstances.
But ultimately, even if it was the right call, as well as a proper call to make under the circumstances, then it's little more than another "tuck rule" fiasco. Meaning the rule itself sucks in the way it's written. Originally Posted by Doove