Will Bernie back down again???

Bernie and Warren are lying their asses off when they say they can afford all this "free shit for everyone" stuff without increasing taxes on the middle class, the very group they pander to. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I do get a kick out of listening to their declarations because they are so foolish. Free tuition for college? Ummm. No. That shit is not happening unless everyone decides to double or triple their tax rate LOL

I don't show my political hand in here because some of you get goofy with the clique shit, but I have no political affiliation. I just care what someone has to say and whether it makes sense. The Democrats and as much as they hate Trump, are about to get him reelected again. They should have put up some better candidates if they wanted to win.

That's great and all but one person is not proof of the overall party's picture. I actually like Kaisch and seriously considered voting for him.



Well I really have to disagree with you on that last sentence. The first year of a presidents office should absolutely not be placed on them.



Here is some data from the Congressional Budget Office:




https://jclark017.github.io/d3_devel...ralbudget.html Originally Posted by aircave

it does count. the fiscal year begins in October. so Trump's first year until October was actually Obama's. whoever succeeds Trump will inherit his budget until October for their first term.

i said in this forum back in 2016 that if not for Trump i would have voted for Kaisch as the best "establishment" republican to run against Hillary.



here i am saying it in 2016 ..

by that logic, the republican nominee should be John Kasich.

that is actually who i would prefer gets the nomination. probably won't happen but he's not a bible trumping twat (Carson, Cruz, Rubio) or a brash loudmouth (Trump), Rand Paul is fiscally similar but an isolationist (a bit too late for that) and Fiorina really was a failure at HP no matter how she spins it. she talks the "talk" but doesn't have the "balls" for the job.

in lieu of Kasich i'd take fatboy Christie.




this is the guy the republicans should nominate. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

kasich? this guy was a limp noodle...

kasich? this guy was a limp noodle... Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

remember when i said that. it was early in the Republican scrum. what Trump said then was intriguing. i mean .. Carly was still in the race. bjhahaaaaaa (sort of). as it went along and Trump easily pulled away from all of them i supported Trump. he's like Reagan was in one way at least .. he didn't change after he got elected. the Soviets noticed something about American politics and presidents in particular .. going back to Truman. after they got elected their rhetoric softened and they used that to their advantage. the one exception was Reagan .. and now Trump.


also take it in context of the post i replied to..


https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=105...5&postcount=50

I'm not a Democrat, so I don't give a fuck who they run.

And, since the GOP (i.e., Paul Ryan) just folded on the budget deal and just gave Obama everything he wanted, I don't know how you can say he set the Democrats back 10 years.

The GOP needs to keep both houses of Congress and put a small government TRUE conservative (not some Bible thumping twat) in the White House. Then maybe we can get some border control, some spending cuts, tax simplification, and a balanced budget (including tax increases if necessary). Originally Posted by ExNYer

now tell me this .. who would you have preferred as president? Kaisch or Hillary?

which one is the limp noodle now?


BAHHAHHAAAAAA

in fact .. i think we should all stroll down memory lane with this thread that i replied to ExNYer AKA The Revenant. it's a classic read. started by SouthClown4488 with this wonderful title ..



What are u Republicunts gonna do when. . .

The party leadership takes the nomination away from Trump? They have already met in private discussing a possible "brokered" convention. They said its because there is no clear leader, but Trump is way ahead and has had the lead for months.

What will you do when that decision is taken away from you by Rience Priebus and other un elected leaders scuttle Trump? You just gonna lay down and take it like the cunts you are? Originally Posted by southtown4488

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1580808


me thinks he was very wrong there yeah? hasn't been back since. there were many "wrong" speculations.



BAHHAAAAAAAA

The climate debate discussion is funny to me. I was born in Los Angeles and the fact that I even have a sense of a smell is a miracle. I don't give a fuck about climate control. Why is a 16 year old weirdo from another country even a catlyst for making this such a hot topic for a debate?

I mean logically speaking, who the fuck even cares about what a candidate even says about their plans about climate control? The climate obviously is not fine; but what the fuck do I care? It wasn't fine when I was born and it won't be fine when I am dead. What the fuck are these people even talking about?

Remember Bernie is pushing the "Scandinavian" model of socialism where the tax rate for everyone is 70%.

Only he wants more like 90%.

No thanks.

The DNC is going to make sure Bernie gets screwed again anyway.

A la Iowa.

Like I said, I have no political affiliation. I just care what you have to say. When I hear people like Sanders and Warren talk, it's time to hit the mute button because they make absolutely no fucking sense to me and their credibility is gone because like most people, I don't care for the increased taxes. I live in Texas and not in California for a reason. I already pay too much in taxes. I'm not paying more.

All of this free this and free that if I am elected is ridiculous. It's not even economically feasible to even fund. It is funny to listen to though, so I'll at least give those old cuckoo birds some credit for their outlandish rhetoric

it does count. the fiscal year begins in October. so Trump's first year until October was actually Obama's. whoever succeeds Trump will inherit his budget until October for their first term.

i said in this forum back in 2016 that if not for Trump i would have voted for Kaisch as the best "establishment" republican to run against Hillary.



here i am saying it in 2016 .. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Kasich finished 4rth in a 3 man race. Rubio dropped out but had more delegates than he did. What a turd.

GF is correct sooooooo its a joke to anyone with 2 livin brain cells,,,,,,,,

Kasich finished 4rth in a 3 man race. Rubio dropped out but had more delegates than he did. What a turd. Originally Posted by bambino

Marco "The Rube" Rubio is probably the only Republican that ran in 2016 i'd have to think about voting for even with Clinton on the other side. for a microsecond at least.



BAHAAHAAAA

Remember Bernie is pushing the "Scandinavian" model of socialism where the tax rate for everyone is 70%.

Only he wants more like 90%.

No thanks.

The DNC is going to make sure Bernie gets screwed again anyway.

A la Iowa. Originally Posted by gfejunkie

90%???

Are yous exaggeratings, or is that the truth?

90%???

Are yous exaggeratings, or is that the truth? Originally Posted by HoeHummer

For the hard of hearing. Or, too bone headed...

Bernie will take down the Fascist DPST party rather than back down this time - he is fixated on turning America into the Socialist States of Amerika - himself as Stalin.

actually I think bernie is in it for himself

the money, the limelight, the visceral rush received from hordes of young adulants

he has worked out quite the scheme for money

not to say he doesn't love that which isn't american, for he does

its just he loves other things more

ol' bernie will never take to the streets - not that much a revolutionary

hellary bought him off agreeing to one pan of the camera across to where he sat with his wife at the 2016 dim convention