Harris policies are what turned Venezuela into a dictatorship. The United States Democrats cheered when they were put in place there. Originally Posted by farmstud60Hugo Chavez came to power in 1999. At that time Kamala Harris was Assistant District Attorney in San Francisco.
Harris policies are what turned Venezuela into a dictatorship. The United States Democrats cheered when they were put in place there. Originally Posted by farmstud60Republicans will probably win the Senate. That will save us from Kamala's worst instincts. And remember, it took Chavez over a decade to turn Venezuela into a basket case. Progressive Democrats won't control the country for that long. At the risk of sounding politically incorrect, Americans are smarter than Venezuelans. That's why most people here didn't fall for "Bidenomics."
Hugo Chavez came to power in 1999. At that time Kamala Harris was Assistant District Attorney in San Francisco.
Your facts are way off. Originally Posted by txdot-guy
You really don't get it. Nothing Harris said is new, it is all the same old failed policies always pushed by the extreme leftwing Democrats that have cheered for Communistists in Central America since the 1980's Originally Posted by farmstud60Democrats don’t cheer for communists. They just don’t fear them as much as the republicans do.
If she robs 30% or 40% of what Peter makes, then she can keep supporting Paul for a long time. But if she jacks it up to 50% or 60% then Peter's going to say fuck this. He'll quit working or move.No doubt something is lost on someone. There's nothing progressive about Kamala or the democratic party platform. It is actually right of center right. Currently, it is nothing more than corporate oligarchy enabled fascism. Which, I suppose is a tiny bit better than totalitarian despotism offered by their opposition.
This is an economics lesson that's lost on some Progressive Democrats who've spent a lifetime in public disservice, like Kamala Harris. Originally Posted by Tiny
You really don't get it. Nothing Harris said is new, it is all the same old failed policies always pushed by the extreme leftwing Democrats that have cheered for Communistists in Central America since the 1980's Originally Posted by farmstud60You mean anyone left of Stalin? There's nothing truly "left" about the Democratic Party. My goodness. Only in relativity to the extreme right wing nut jobs. I bet you think Dwight D Eisenhower was a Commie. He would be relegated to the "extreme left" in today's body politic. Actually, he was a true progressive. As were the framers, and all of those who have moved us forward. To be a conservative since Ronald Reagan is the height of unknowing. The root of the word is conserve. You must have something worth conserving to justify claiming conservative political standing.
This is ridiculous. What policy? Originally Posted by AwesomeAceHe couldn't name one, provide a specific topic or its societal real world affect to save his soul from hell. I live about an hour give or take from Omaha. There is no more intellectually lazy demographic on earth than conventional commodity producers. Notice I did not use the word "Farmer"....
Republicans will probably win the Senate. That will save us from Kamala's worst instincts. And remember, it took Chavez over a decade to turn Venezuela into a basket case. Progressive Democrats won't control the country for that long. At the risk of sounding politically incorrect, Americans are smarter than Venezuelans. That's why most people here didn't fall for "Bidenomics."The lack of understanding concerning America's body politik here is quite impressive. I'm not going to unpack it. I just wanted you to know. Too bad it's not an Olympic sport. You might very well be on the Wheaties box.
I'll also point out that it was only the Progressives like Bernie Sanders who were cheering back then. But of course they've since run a lot of the wiser Democrats, like Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin, out of the party. Unfortunately the same thing's been happening in the Republican Party. Originally Posted by Tiny
What else can you call it. Nobody voted for her. Her predecessor was “asked to leave” in a manner that would make Leonid Brezhnev proud.The only logical conclusion I can come to, you are trying to establish grounds for a "not fit for trial" plea. You sound like a third grader parroting their untraveled, uneducated, unread, uncouth "I never been anywhere or seen anything, but I know shit" Midwestern father. Using a lot of words to say absolutely nothing.
Just call her “Madam General Secretary” of The Party.
“Premier Obama” and Politburo members Pelosi and Schumer have spoken. Originally Posted by Jackie S
Lame azz, false narrative memes are the refuge of losers, liars and agitprop tools. The economy is not something any GOP supporter wants to bring up. My god it's been crashed and terrible under every Republican president since Reagan. Good God. You don't even hear yourself.Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
What else can you call it. Nobody voted for her. Her predecessor was “asked to leave” in a manner that would make Leonid Brezhnev proud.
Just call her “Madam General Secretary” of The Party.
“Premier Obama” and Politburo members Pelosi and Schumer have spoken. Originally Posted by Jackie S
Gee, it is easy to see you don't know history very well. Democracy's had always failed fairly quickly. The founding fathers and drafted the U.S. Constitution as a Republic and tried to put a layer in to protect the corruption that always follows when you let the mob rule. Pretty easy to see the Democrats are the mob and totally clueless. Originally Posted by farmstud60
