Comments on the political pressure applied?

If a reasonable person would feel like the government was going to ruin their livelihood if they did not "voluntarily" cease their activity, then that isn't much of a choice, is it? Originally Posted by DSK

Exactly

[COLOR=Blue][I]They are universes apart. Having a picture on BP will disqualify ladies from ever being a member of many of the inner circle dating groups that will not take that chance with the wrong PR from an overly inquisitive reporter. Originally Posted by Old-T

Your "assumption" is that BP pictures are ALWAYS of the RW person.

That "assumption" is terribly flawed!

"the inner circle dating groups"?

You mean from where you select your whores?

Your "assumption" is that BP pictures are ALWAYS of the RW person.

That "assumption" is terribly flawed!
Really? I am shocked! But real pictures or not, anyone who would post on BP is not likely to be invited into those groups.

"the inner circle dating groups"?

You mean from where you select your whores? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Typical of you. Can't tolerate anyone else actually having experiences and opinions that don't match yours, can you? You have to try and make it about your dislike of me instead of keeping on topic. Sad, actually. There really is a bigger, more diverse world out there than you seem willing to accept.

... The collapse of the financial system via forced loans to unqualified borrowers... Originally Posted by The2Dogs

??? You must live in an alternate universe. No one is ever "forced" to take a loan, least of all if they are unqualified for it.

Delete

??? You must live in an alternate universe. No one is ever "forced" to take a loan, least of all if they are unqualified for it. Originally Posted by lustylad

Wrong - black people were forced to accept home loans. Some literally were told if they didn't accept the loans they applied for, they would be lynched or killed by the police, or both.

Others tried to walk away from their loans, but were kidnapped and forced to take the loans, live in the houses, and required not to make the payments. If they did not trash the fuck out of the houses, they were threatened with more police torture.

It sucks being black in America.

Wrong - black people were forced to accept home loans. Some literally were told if they didn't accept the loans they applied for, they would be lynched or killed by the police, or both.

Others tried to walk away from their loans, but were kidnapped and forced to take the loans, live in the houses, and required not to make the payments. If they did not trash the fuck out of the houses, they were threatened with more police torture.

It sucks being black in America. Originally Posted by DSK

never heard that one.

have heard many could not get one.

Wrong - black people were forced to accept home loans. Some literally were told if they didn't accept the loans they applied for, they would be lynched or killed by the police, or both.

Others tried to walk away from their loans, but were kidnapped and forced to take the loans, live in the houses, and required not to make the payments. If they did not trash the fuck out of the houses, they were threatened with more police torture.

It sucks being black in America. Originally Posted by DSK

Shit, is that what happened? I'm so glad the DOJ under the unbiased and non-partisan direction of Eric Holder/Loretta Lynch sought remedies for this outrageous injustice! The banks that forced loans on those poor borrowers evidently wanted the loans to go into default so they could lose money on them! And they wanted to let the borrowers live in their homes for free without making mortgage payments! And they were eager to be sued by the DOJ so they could cough up billion-dollar settlements to fund libtard groups hand-picked by Eric Holder and Barack Obama!

never heard that one.

have heard many could not get one. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

That just means they weren't aggressive enough. The same folks who threatened to sue their banks in 2005 if they were turned down for a mortgage ended up claiming in 2009 they were "forced" to accept those loans. Thanks to the libtards and their narrative of victimization by the banks, they got to live in their homes for free. Only suckers pay their mortgage!

Shit, is that what happened? I'm so glad the DOJ under the unbiased and non-partisan direction of Eric Holder/Loretta Lynch sought remedies for this outrageous injustice! The banks that forced loans on those poor borrowers evidently wanted the loans to go into default so they could lose money on them! And they wanted to let the borrowers live in their homes for free without making mortgage payments! And they were eager to be sued by the DOJ so they could cough up billion-dollar settlements to fund libtard groups hand-picked by Eric Holder and Barack Obama! Originally Posted by lustylad

It must suck to be sued (and lose!!) because your deadbeat borrowers didn't pay you back and blamed you for loaning them the money. That is the beauty of the racism claim - it trumps everything else.

never heard that one.

have heard many could not get one. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

They hung most of them upside down out the window, and told them they would be dropped on their heads if they didn't take the money.

Youtube had videos but they were taken down for violations of the TOS.