you lost the game. so take your football and go home, Lucy. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kidnot a game to me.. I'm not entertained by carping back and forth like most of you here.. your boy Bambi thought it was entertaining to say I voted for Hillary and don't play golf. the little games bore me.
- Chung Tran
- 09-25-2019, 09:58 PM
- Levianon17
- 09-25-2019, 10:01 PM
- Jacuzzme
- 09-25-2019, 10:13 PM
Actually it’s nowhere near the hottest September in Dallas. Dallas, and the rest of the planet for that matter, was once a sea of molten lava. It was also once covered by 1000 feet of ice. Climate has, and always will, change. Our contribution to the billions of years of constant planetary change is of less significance than a microbe on a flee on a dogs ass. Notice when the doomsday crews put up their “omfg it’s hot” charts they only go back .00001% of the earths existence. Keep the people stupid.
There is no climate crisis, just like there was no ice age, as predicted in the 70’s. Acid rain didn’t melt our skin. We weren’t disfigured by cosmic gamma rays because hairspray and deodorant caused the ozone to disappear. It’s a bunch of horseshit.
There is no climate crisis, just like there was no ice age, as predicted in the 70’s. Acid rain didn’t melt our skin. We weren’t disfigured by cosmic gamma rays because hairspray and deodorant caused the ozone to disappear. It’s a bunch of horseshit.
- The_Waco_Kid
- 09-25-2019, 10:50 PM
Dozens of Failed Climate Predictions Stretch 80 Years Back
https://www.theepochtimes.com/dozens...k_3096733.html
By Petr Svab
Comments September 25, 2019 Updated: September 25, 2019
Apocalyptic climate and environmental catastrophes of global proportions have decimated the world many times over in recent decades—at least based on dozens of predictions made by various scientists, experts, and officials over the past 80 years.
Newspaper clippings documenting the predictions were recently published by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. Many of those were first collected by geologist and electrical engineer Tony Heller, who frequently criticizes—on his RealClimateScience.com website—what he considers fraud in the current mainstream climate research.
The predictions, some going as far back as 1930s, not only at times contradict each other, but sometimes foretell the same imminent catastrophe repeatedly for years, even decades, seemingly undeterred by past failures.
Arctic Meltdown
“All the glaciers in Eastern Greenland are rapidly melting,” the Harrisburg [Pennsylvania] Sunday Courier reported on Dec. 17, 1939.
“It may without exaggeration be said that the glaciers—like those in Norway—face the possibility of a catastrophic collapse,” the paper quoted Prof. Hans Ahlmann, a Swedish geologist, from a report to the Geographical Society after his Arctic expedition.
Ahlmann, a world authority on climate and glaciers in his time, was even more graphic eight years later.
“The possibility of a prodigious rise in the surface of the ocean with resultant widespread inundation, arising from an Arctic climate phenomenon was discussed yesterday by Dr. Hans Ahlmann, a noted Swedish geophysicist at the University of California Geophysical Institute,” a 1947 article in The West Australian said.
“The Arctic change is so serious that I hope an international agency can speedily be formed to study the conditions on a global basis,” Ahlmann said.
Stories about a melting Arctic were still in vogue with the media in the 1950s.
“The glaciers of Norway and Alaska are only half the size they were 50 years ago,” said Dr. William Carlson, an Arctic expert, according to the Feb. 18, 1952, edition of The Cairns [Australia] Post.
“There are now six million square miles of ice in the Arctic. There once were 12 million square miles,” said Arctic explorer Adm. Donald McMillan, according to the March 10, 1955, issue of Rochester, New York’s Democrat and Chronicle.
‘Population Bomb’
In the 1960s, a new environmental prediction was on the rise—overpopulation.
“It is already too late for the world to avoid a long period of famine,” The Salt Lake Tribune reported in 1967, citing Paul Ehrlich’s prediction of famines by 1975.
Ehrlich, a Stanford University biologist and author of “The Population Bomb,” proposed lacing staple foods and drinking water with sterilizing agents to cut the growing population of the United States, according to the report.
Ehrlich was on fire by 1970, getting two dozen speaking requests per day and predicting that America would be rationing water by 1974 and food by 1980, California’s Redlands Daily Facts reported.
But around the same time, a new prognosis was on the horizon.
Global Cooling
“Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century,” The Boston Globe reported on Apr. 16, 1970, saying that pollution expert James Lodge predicted that “air pollution may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the new century.”
In 1972, two Brown University geologists wrote a letter to President Richard Nixon, reporting that a conference attended by “42 top American and European investigators” concluded “a global deterioration of climate, by order of magnitude larger than any hitherto experienced by civilized mankind, is a very real possibility and indeed may be due very soon.”
“The present rate of cooling,” they said, “seems fast enough to bring glacial temperatures in about a century, if continuing at the present pace.”
By 1975, the writing was on the wall, with major publications including The Washington Post, The Guardian, and Time magazine running their own stories on the predictions of a coming ice age.
“An international team of specialists has concluded from eight indexes of climate that there is no end in sight to the cooling trend of the last 30 years, at least in the Northern Hemisphere,” The New York Times reported in 1978.
A year later, the paper was reporting the opposite—a prediction of an Arctic meltdown, blaming global warming caused by carbon dioxide emissions.
“There is a real possibility that some people now in their infancy will live to a time when the ice at the North Pole will have melted, a change that would cause swift and perhaps catastrophic changes in climate,” the 1979 article said.
Apparently, The Chicago Tribune didn’t get the memo, still reporting the “global cooling” narrative in 1981.
Arctic Meltdown 2
By the late 1980s, the narrative had switched to global warming for good, again predicting polar ice melting on a catastrophic scale.
“A senior environmental official at the United Nations, Noel Brown, says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000,” California’s San Jose Mercury News reported on June 30, 1989. “Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos, said Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program.”
The first to disappear were to be the island nations teetering just a few feet above the ocean level.
The small nation of Maldives was threatened to be completely covered by “a gradual rise in average sea level,” Agence France-Presse reported in 1988, noting that “the end of the Maldives and its people could come sooner if drinking water supplies dry up by 1992, as predicted.”
Yet 31 years later, the Maldives are thriving. Its population has doubled since the 1980s, and its picturesque islands are “set for a flurry of new resort openings,” Hotelier Maldives reported in 2018.
After a pause from the 1950s to the 1980s, the predictions of an Arctic meltdown are back in full swing in recent decades. The region was meant to be ice-free in summer by 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2018, based on various predictions.
Yet the Greenland Climate Research Centre reported plenty of ice in the Arctic in August 2019.
Some scientists have argued the earth is currently undergoing warming largely caused by carbon emissions due to fossil fuel burning; other scientists disagree, assigning the dominant effect to other forces or even disregarding the warming as insignificant.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/dozens...k_3096733.html
By Petr Svab
Comments September 25, 2019 Updated: September 25, 2019
Apocalyptic climate and environmental catastrophes of global proportions have decimated the world many times over in recent decades—at least based on dozens of predictions made by various scientists, experts, and officials over the past 80 years.
Newspaper clippings documenting the predictions were recently published by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. Many of those were first collected by geologist and electrical engineer Tony Heller, who frequently criticizes—on his RealClimateScience.com website—what he considers fraud in the current mainstream climate research.
The predictions, some going as far back as 1930s, not only at times contradict each other, but sometimes foretell the same imminent catastrophe repeatedly for years, even decades, seemingly undeterred by past failures.
Arctic Meltdown
“All the glaciers in Eastern Greenland are rapidly melting,” the Harrisburg [Pennsylvania] Sunday Courier reported on Dec. 17, 1939.
“It may without exaggeration be said that the glaciers—like those in Norway—face the possibility of a catastrophic collapse,” the paper quoted Prof. Hans Ahlmann, a Swedish geologist, from a report to the Geographical Society after his Arctic expedition.
Ahlmann, a world authority on climate and glaciers in his time, was even more graphic eight years later.
“The possibility of a prodigious rise in the surface of the ocean with resultant widespread inundation, arising from an Arctic climate phenomenon was discussed yesterday by Dr. Hans Ahlmann, a noted Swedish geophysicist at the University of California Geophysical Institute,” a 1947 article in The West Australian said.
“The Arctic change is so serious that I hope an international agency can speedily be formed to study the conditions on a global basis,” Ahlmann said.
Stories about a melting Arctic were still in vogue with the media in the 1950s.
“The glaciers of Norway and Alaska are only half the size they were 50 years ago,” said Dr. William Carlson, an Arctic expert, according to the Feb. 18, 1952, edition of The Cairns [Australia] Post.
“There are now six million square miles of ice in the Arctic. There once were 12 million square miles,” said Arctic explorer Adm. Donald McMillan, according to the March 10, 1955, issue of Rochester, New York’s Democrat and Chronicle.
‘Population Bomb’
In the 1960s, a new environmental prediction was on the rise—overpopulation.
“It is already too late for the world to avoid a long period of famine,” The Salt Lake Tribune reported in 1967, citing Paul Ehrlich’s prediction of famines by 1975.
Ehrlich, a Stanford University biologist and author of “The Population Bomb,” proposed lacing staple foods and drinking water with sterilizing agents to cut the growing population of the United States, according to the report.
Ehrlich was on fire by 1970, getting two dozen speaking requests per day and predicting that America would be rationing water by 1974 and food by 1980, California’s Redlands Daily Facts reported.
But around the same time, a new prognosis was on the horizon.
Global Cooling
“Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century,” The Boston Globe reported on Apr. 16, 1970, saying that pollution expert James Lodge predicted that “air pollution may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the new century.”
In 1972, two Brown University geologists wrote a letter to President Richard Nixon, reporting that a conference attended by “42 top American and European investigators” concluded “a global deterioration of climate, by order of magnitude larger than any hitherto experienced by civilized mankind, is a very real possibility and indeed may be due very soon.”
“The present rate of cooling,” they said, “seems fast enough to bring glacial temperatures in about a century, if continuing at the present pace.”
By 1975, the writing was on the wall, with major publications including The Washington Post, The Guardian, and Time magazine running their own stories on the predictions of a coming ice age.
“An international team of specialists has concluded from eight indexes of climate that there is no end in sight to the cooling trend of the last 30 years, at least in the Northern Hemisphere,” The New York Times reported in 1978.
A year later, the paper was reporting the opposite—a prediction of an Arctic meltdown, blaming global warming caused by carbon dioxide emissions.
“There is a real possibility that some people now in their infancy will live to a time when the ice at the North Pole will have melted, a change that would cause swift and perhaps catastrophic changes in climate,” the 1979 article said.
Apparently, The Chicago Tribune didn’t get the memo, still reporting the “global cooling” narrative in 1981.
Arctic Meltdown 2
By the late 1980s, the narrative had switched to global warming for good, again predicting polar ice melting on a catastrophic scale.
“A senior environmental official at the United Nations, Noel Brown, says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000,” California’s San Jose Mercury News reported on June 30, 1989. “Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos, said Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program.”
The first to disappear were to be the island nations teetering just a few feet above the ocean level.
The small nation of Maldives was threatened to be completely covered by “a gradual rise in average sea level,” Agence France-Presse reported in 1988, noting that “the end of the Maldives and its people could come sooner if drinking water supplies dry up by 1992, as predicted.”
Yet 31 years later, the Maldives are thriving. Its population has doubled since the 1980s, and its picturesque islands are “set for a flurry of new resort openings,” Hotelier Maldives reported in 2018.
After a pause from the 1950s to the 1980s, the predictions of an Arctic meltdown are back in full swing in recent decades. The region was meant to be ice-free in summer by 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2018, based on various predictions.
Yet the Greenland Climate Research Centre reported plenty of ice in the Arctic in August 2019.
Some scientists have argued the earth is currently undergoing warming largely caused by carbon emissions due to fossil fuel burning; other scientists disagree, assigning the dominant effect to other forces or even disregarding the warming as insignificant.
- The_Waco_Kid
- 09-26-2019, 12:03 AM
well. guess who has links to ANTIFA? little greta the retard and her PARENTS! how interesting ANITFA pops up on the radar. actually i'd have been surprised if ANTIFA hadn't shown up.
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/must-r...s-connections/
Greta Thunberg Pushed to Prominence by ANTIFA Parents and Soros Connections
The Greta phenomenon is far from organic.
Published 1 day ago on Sep 24, 2019
By
Shane Trejo
16-year-old climate change activist Greta Thunberg has quickly risen to become one of the world’s most prominent political leaders, inspiring a mass movement of millions seemingly out of thin air to combat the problem of global warming.
However, the young girl’s sudden ascent to prominence is not happening by chance. She has deep connections to the globalist elite and activist parents who are supporters of the far-left domestic terrorist group ANTIFA.
Thunberg’s frequent handler is Luisa-Marie Neubauer, an operative from the ONE Movement. Neubauer can be seen behind Thunberg at many of her public events.
Thunberg’s initial school strike coincided with the publication of her mother’s memoir, “Scenes from the Heart.” Her first protest was initially made public on the social media account of Ingmar Rentzhog, the book’s public relations man.
They have also turned Thunberg into a money-making machine, using the child to fleece environmentalists out of large donations. Rentzhog founded a climate-focused PR firm ‘We Don’t Have Time,’ and put Thunberg on the Youth Advisory Board. The organization has raised nearly a million pounds before Thunberg was even thrust into the spotlight as a worldwide icon.
The Thunberg family also regularly employs bizarre and quasi-satanic symbolism, typical of those who perpetrate behind the globalist authoritarian agenda:
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/must-r...s-connections/
Greta Thunberg Pushed to Prominence by ANTIFA Parents and Soros Connections
The Greta phenomenon is far from organic.
Published 1 day ago on Sep 24, 2019
By
Shane Trejo
16-year-old climate change activist Greta Thunberg has quickly risen to become one of the world’s most prominent political leaders, inspiring a mass movement of millions seemingly out of thin air to combat the problem of global warming.
However, the young girl’s sudden ascent to prominence is not happening by chance. She has deep connections to the globalist elite and activist parents who are supporters of the far-left domestic terrorist group ANTIFA.
Thunberg’s frequent handler is Luisa-Marie Neubauer, an operative from the ONE Movement. Neubauer can be seen behind Thunberg at many of her public events.
5. HER HANDLERThe Gates Foundation admits on their official website that the ONE Movement is a collaboration between some of the world’s richest and most powerful interests, including infamous progressive financier George Soros:
On the photos behind her u see Luisa-Marie Neubauer, her handler.
She's a member of "ONE Foundation" managed by BONO, Bill Gates and George Soros pic.twitter.com/CrccrEzB81
Trending: Gun Control Fail: Two Killed, Seven Wounded in ‘Mass Shootings’ in D.C.
— Wide Awake ������������ Q-Army Swiss Division (@timetowakeupsw1) September 19, 2019
ONE originated in conversations between Bill Gates and Bono in the early 2000s about the need to better inform Americans about extreme poverty around the world. Together with Melinda Gates, Bobby Shriver, George Soros, Ed Scott, Bob Geldof, and Jamie Drummond, they created an anti-poverty advocacy organization called DATA that focused on deploying celebrities and other influential individuals to urge world leaders to take action on specific development issues. Within a few years, DATA had joined with several other organizations to form ONE, with major backing from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.Thunberg was forced to apologize this summer for wearing an ANTIFA t-shirt by mistake. She claimed on her Twitter account that she did not realize that the t-shirt was advertising a violent extremist organization.
Yesterday I posted a photo wearing a borrowed T-shirt that says I’m against fascism. That T-shirt can apparently to some be linked to a violent movement. I don’t support any form of violence and to avoid misunderstandings I’ve deleted the post. And of course I am against fascism.However, her parents – Svante Thunberg and Malena Ernman – have been photographed wearing the exact same t-shirt, casting serious doubt on her explanation.
— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) July 26, 2019
Greta Thunberg (and her folks!) are antifa. pic.twitter.com/behjYnrKMsThunberg’s mother, Malena Ernman, is a popular Swedish opera singer, and a long-time far left activist. She indoctrinated her daughter, who has been diagnosed with Autism and other mental disorders, from the youngest of ages with apocalyptic dogma about the environment. She even claims her daughter can see particles of carbon dioxide in the air, as Thunberg has been steeped in fantasy and delusion her entire life.
— Antifa International (@antifaintl) September 24, 2019
Thunberg’s initial school strike coincided with the publication of her mother’s memoir, “Scenes from the Heart.” Her first protest was initially made public on the social media account of Ingmar Rentzhog, the book’s public relations man.
They have also turned Thunberg into a money-making machine, using the child to fleece environmentalists out of large donations. Rentzhog founded a climate-focused PR firm ‘We Don’t Have Time,’ and put Thunberg on the Youth Advisory Board. The organization has raised nearly a million pounds before Thunberg was even thrust into the spotlight as a worldwide icon.
The Thunberg family also regularly employs bizarre and quasi-satanic symbolism, typical of those who perpetrate behind the globalist authoritarian agenda:
This explains it all. @GretaThunberg mother actress??? Malena Ernman-Thunberg, buying a frozen pizza, wrapped in plastic
pic.twitter.com/MiiqRc1of7
— Manny_Ottawa (@manny_ottawa) September 22, 2019
pic.twitter.com/MvxYaJ2DqxAs usual, there is far more than meets the eye regarding the new false idol of the anti-human climate cult.
— Wide Awake ������������ Q-Army Swiss Division (@timetowakeupsw1) September 19, 2019
- Clit Eastwood
- 09-26-2019, 01:14 AM
Stupid moron!
What's in it for you? Are you an oil company owner? You have zero understanding of climate change nor understanding of the science behind it. You're just spitting out republican values that don't even benefit you. Take a few minutes to look at the history of your political party and you'll find out that there was a time your party was pushing socialist measure that use to benefit all Americans. Today your party is very much socialist and generously give to high networth individuals and corporation. You don't even benefit from that. In fact they take your money to pay these guys! Tell this board why is climate change not real and how we're going to all benefit from it instead of writing dumb random stuff!
What's in it for you? Are you an oil company owner? You have zero understanding of climate change nor understanding of the science behind it. You're just spitting out republican values that don't even benefit you. Take a few minutes to look at the history of your political party and you'll find out that there was a time your party was pushing socialist measure that use to benefit all Americans. Today your party is very much socialist and generously give to high networth individuals and corporation. You don't even benefit from that. In fact they take your money to pay these guys! Tell this board why is climate change not real and how we're going to all benefit from it instead of writing dumb random stuff!
- The_Waco_Kid
- 09-26-2019, 01:30 AM
- themystic
- 09-26-2019, 02:15 AM
Stupid moron!The Lama is retarded. No one takes him serious. He doesn't know his stuff. He was saved by Obama when Bush crashed the economy. Hes a typical ungrateful "bites the hands that feeds him". Right now hes getting government welfare from the China Tariffs. But the short answer is he is a moron. He mows my yard, washes, waxes and details my truck, and anything I tell him. Hes like Biff in the movie Back to the Future. Its a pretty common personality of Trump fans, They have to have someone tell then what to do
What's in it for you? Are you an oil company owner? You have zero understanding of climate change nor understanding of the science behind it. You're just spitting out republican values that don't even benefit you. Take a few minutes to look at the history of your political party and you'll find out that there was a time your party was pushing socialist measure that use to benefit all Americans. Today your party is very much socialist and generously give to high networth individuals and corporation. You don't even benefit from that. In fact they take your money to pay these guys! Tell this board why is climate change not real and how we're going to all benefit from it instead of writing dumb random stuff! Originally Posted by Clit Eastwood
- friendly fred
- 09-26-2019, 06:03 AM
of course.. but why say climate change is false, like so many on the right say? why make fun of the high school girl? the fucking thermometer hit 98 degrees today in Dallas, don't fucking tell me that's not climate change. Originally Posted by Chung TranWell, I remember back in 1980 the temperature hit over 100° for something like 42 days straight here in Dallas - and that is still the record.
Does that count as climate change?
How do you feel about the fact that a crew had to be flown in to take the high school girl's boat back to her homeland across the ocean?
- rexdutchman
- 09-26-2019, 09:03 AM
Called "wait for it" WEATHER , the earth has been warming From the ice ages ,,,
"If the theory ,was fact and anything
they have said was you know correct maybe someone would believe
"If the theory ,was fact and anything
they have said was you know correct maybe someone would believe
- dilbert firestorm
- 09-26-2019, 09:34 AM
what the parents did to Greta is child abuse!!!
- Levianon17
- 09-26-2019, 11:41 AM
Stupid moron!It's obvious you don't know what you're talking about. One thing I'll make clear Climate Change is a real thing. First lets look at what actually influences Climate. The factors involved are Latitude, Land Elevation, nearby Bodies of water, Ocean currents, Topography ( shape and features of land masses), Vegetation and Prevailing winds. These are the natural factors which influence climate. There are six main climate regions, Polar(very cold and dry),Temperate Regions, Arid Regions (Desserts), Damp Tropical regions(Rain forests) Mild Mediterranean and Tundra. Weather is defined as the state of the atmosphere, degree of hot or cold, calm or stormy, clear or cloudy, Rain, Snow, Sleet or Hail natural disasters such as Tornadoes and Hurricanes. Climate Change is the natural order of the planet it's also responsible for the season changes, (Winter to Spring to Summer to fall) ect. None of these things are influenced by the use of Fossil Fuels. Use of Fossil fuels is only responsible for contaminating or polluting the environment.
What's in it for you? Are you an oil company owner? You have zero understanding of climate change nor understanding of the science behind it. You're just spitting out republican values that don't even benefit you. Take a few minutes to look at the history of your political party and you'll find out that there was a time your party was pushing socialist measure that use to benefit all Americans. Today your party is very much socialist and generously give to high networth individuals and corporation. You don't even benefit from that. In fact they take your money to pay these guys! Tell this board why is climate change not real and how we're going to all benefit from it instead of writing dumb random stuff! Originally Posted by Clit Eastwood
- Tiny
- 09-26-2019, 12:39 PM
see the problem???No shit Sherlock. There's not much the USA and Western Europe can do. What happens to carbon emissions going forward depends on what developing countries do.
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Which brings up a related point. While I want to bang AOC, I detest the arrogant, sanctimonious little shit standing next to her in Dali Lama's photo. If little Greta were from the Maldives or some other place that may be under water someday, I'd have a different attitude. But she's Swedish. Sweden benefits from global warming. Maybe Greta won't have to go on as many winter vacations to the Riviera and Greece when she's middle aged.
Furthermore, 94% of Sweden's energy is from hydroelectric, nuclear, other energy sources that don't produce carbon emissions. So cute, crazy little Greta's not going to have to make any sacrifice whatsoever in her quality of life or cost of living if everybody else does what she wants them to do.
That's not true though of the Indian kid in an apartment block in Mumbai who lives in temperatures exceeding 110 degrees because he has no air conditioning. Or the kid in Senegal who dies of diarrhea because his city can't afford to pay the electricity costs to run its sewage treatment plant. Not to mention the kids who don't have lights in their houses or a way to get to school. Fuck little Greta.
- eccielover
- 09-26-2019, 01:00 PM
No shit Sherlock. There's not much the USA and Western Europe can do. What happens to carbon emissions going forward depends on what developing countries do.All true. She's definitely being used as a victim in this whole thing.
Which brings up a related point. While I want to bang AOC, I detest the arrogant, sanctimonious little shit standing next to her in Dali Lama's photo. If little Greta were from the Maldives or some other place that may be under water someday, I'd have a different attitude. But she's Swedish. Sweden benefits from global warming. Maybe Greta won't have to go on as many winter vacations to the Riviera and Greece when she's middle aged.
Furthermore, 94% of Sweden's energy is from hydroelectric, nuclear, other energy sources that don't produce carbon emissions. So cute, crazy little Greta's not going to have to make any sacrifice whatsoever in her quality of life or cost of living if everybody else does what she wants them to do.
That's not true though of the Indian kid in an apartment block in Mumbai who lives in temperatures exceeding 110 degrees because he has no air conditioning. Or the kid in Senegal who dies of diarrhea because his city can't afford to pay the electricity costs to run its sewage treatment plant. Not to mention the kids who don't have lights in their houses or a way to get to school. Fuck little Greta. Originally Posted by Tiny
- rexdutchman
- 09-27-2019, 09:27 AM
Yeah let see at best she was 10 before noticing weather, so for 6 years her parents / the box ( think 1984) have convinced her ( brainwashed) of the climate scam . This is the reason history isn't in schools - NO basis of fact ( I'm 60 so -10 I have 50 years of seeing weather go up and down. News saying Hot Sept But not really fact hurt the DPST again,,,
So many people need to go back to the basement and lit Moms bring the Pop-tarts
So many people need to go back to the basement and lit Moms bring the Pop-tarts