I’m A Progressive. And I’m With Her.

Saying I'm a progressive is the equivalent of saying I'm a fascist with socialist tendencies.

Thanks @Mr_Pinko...



http://spectator.org/hillarys-cop-ba...t-and-present/

http://dcwhispers.com/hillary-clinto...t-racist-pigs/

a student radical during the Black Panthers era, Hillary Clinton gravitated to the company of anti-cop activists. At Yale, she helped edit a law journal that depicted police officers as racist pigs and ran numerous articles in defense of cop-killers.

During her law school stint, she spent free moments offering assistance to the lawyers for Black Panthers who had killed a federal agent. She “monitored” the Bobby Seale trial in New Haven, hoping to catch the prosecutors out in mistakes that could later trigger an appeal.

She also hobnobbed with the “Radical Chic” social set, going to cocktail parties with the lawyers for the Black Panthers. Through one of those events, she met Robert Treuhaft and Jessica Mitford, two Stalinists from California whom historians have established collaborated with the Soviet Union as members of the American Communist Party. Robert Treuhaft ran a law firm in California, and Hillary spent one of her summers doing a legal internship at his firm in Oakland. Treuhaft thought that she might object to his Red ties. But at the time she didn’t care. In her autobiography, however, she was embarrassed enough about the association to try and minimize her work there: “I spent most of my time working for Mal Burnstein researching, writing legal motions and briefs for a child custody case.”

Treuhaft’s firm was notorious not only for its Red associations but also its unapologetic defense of cop-killers. That Hillary would devote a summer to working for such creepy subversives reveals the depth of her radical instincts. It is not hard to imagine her signing off on cartoons in the Yale Review caricaturing cops as pigs conjuring up the foulest racist thoughts as they walked the streets.

Even Bernie Sanders might have thought twice about working for Robert Treuhaft. But not Hillary. Having written her senior thesis at Wellesley on the radical agitprop of Saul Alinsky, who was so impressed that he offered her a job after graduation, Hillary was game for a summer in Oakland in the company of Marxists and ACLU anarchists. She chanted “no justice, no peace” long before Black Lives Matter did.

A justification for violence against police officers is assumed in that chant, but that doesn’t stop Hillary from casting it as a legitimate protest. Even as they denounce the violence against cops, the Democrats join in chants, walk in protests, and give speeches that rationalize it. The ideology behind the protests holds that the racially aggrieved should not have to obey the law and that any government seeking to enforce it is inherently racist and thus worthy of resistance.

This ideology creeps into Hillary’s remarks, even at moments when she is straining to appear irenic. In her speech to an African Methodist Episcopal Church in Philadelphia last week, she uncorked the claim that “implicit bias” exists “even in the best police departments.” While claiming to detest “profiling,” Hillary gives herself the right to profile good police officers as racist. She adds “implicit” to dilute the insult and to build herself up as the omniscient central planner who will reorganize police departments so perfectly that not even implicit racism will shape their policies. How these central planners are immune to the implicit racism Hillary sees everywhere is never made clear. She says it “exists across society” but somehow it doesn’t touch her.

The upshot of this ideology is that as long as police officers arrest minorities for committing crimes they will fall under suspicion and face resistance. They can only escape the charge of racism by abdicating their duties. Hillary doesn’t want to “reform” police departments but castrate them. Her cop-bashing these days is more circumspect and subdued than it was in the 1970s, but it is no less ideologically crass. She is no longer romanticizing the Black Panthers, but she is romanticizing their heirs.

Even after a jury found that Trayvon Martin had died after trying to smash George Zimmerman’s head into cement, Hillary still casts him, as she did last week, as a cherubic angel struck down by society’s sinister forces. “White Americans,” she said, need to do a better job of “listening when African Americans talk.” If they did, she said, they would understand why black people say a prayer when their “baby” goes to a store “to buy iced tea and Skittles.”

For Hillary, whether shilling for the Black Panthers in the 1970s or Black Lives Matter today, the cops always end up as the criminals.

You're ate up with the dumbass Sassy

I seldom cut and paste but this one I could not pass up.
the2Dogs

Charles Krauthammer: The Clinton Foundation is Organized Crime.

Charles Krauthammer is a brilliant man. Really brilliant.
A man of character who lives his life in a Wheelchair.

Among other careers, he is a doctor of psychiatry.
He was a devoted Democratic activist and presidential advisor.
An independent thinker who won the Pulitzer Prize.
He has both liberal and conservative stances and writes a weekly column
in the National Review which is syndicated to 400 newspapers.
He has been a regular panelist on a variety of programs, including Fox News.

Mr. Krauthammer is an independent thinker and has become a neoconservative.

Why am I telling you this?
Because a brilliant man of character as he is can clearly see much that we do not.

Please read this article.

Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton

Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private e-mail server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest.

Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. History.

This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.

Here's how it works:

1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clintons set it up in Canada .

2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did – contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clintons , pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result – foreign money goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. Uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia . This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted.

As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. Security at risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons , ask yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and
countries in need?

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal and they are Slick!

You're ate up with the dumbass Sassy Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

She has a nice ass....which counts for something.

She has a nice ass....which counts for something. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Pic?

Pic? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

You didn't see the one she posted?

The problem is ... what's "nice" to me may not be to your liking.

I'm kinda partial to those that don't require a seatbelt extension ....

... if you get my drift!

Hers requires no pillow underneath to avoid chin-skin burn while warming her up!

I just want to know what she is willing to contribute to this "progressive" movement or does she expect, like all progressives, for somebody else to tote the load.

I just want to know what she is willing to contribute to this "progressive" movement or does she expect, like all progressives, for somebody else to tote the load. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Like her hero Babblin Bernie did at the commune he stayed at for a while until they grew tired of carrying HIS lazy ass !

Pic? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

I wasted some of my valuable time looking for it, but didn't find it. I'll beg her for a repost next time she surfaces ... may be she'll show off for us with the next one. Nice legs, also. I hate begging, but she probably likes being begged!

I just want to know what she is willing to contribute to this "progressive" movement or does she expect, like all progressives, for somebody else to tote the load. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Are you talking about SassyPoo?

I seldom cut and paste but this one I could not pass up.
the2Dogs

Charles Krauthammer: The Clinton Foundation is Organized Crime.

Charles Krauthammer is a brilliant man. Really brilliant.
A man of character who lives his life in a Wheelchair.

Among other careers, he is a doctor of psychiatry.
He was a devoted Democratic activist and presidential advisor.
An independent thinker who won the Pulitzer Prize.
He has both liberal and conservative stances and writes a weekly column
in the National Review which is syndicated to 400 newspapers.
He has been a regular panelist on a variety of programs, including Fox News.

Mr. Krauthammer is an independent thinker and has become a neoconservative.

Why am I telling you this?
Because a brilliant man of character as he is can clearly see much that we do not.

Please read this article.

Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton

Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private e-mail server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest.

Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. History.

This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.

Here's how it works:

1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clintons set it up in Canada .

2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did – contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clintons , pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result – foreign money goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. Uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia . This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted.

As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. Security at risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons , ask yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and
countries in need?

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal and they are Slick!

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

How do you know that what the Clinton Foundation does is illegal? Trump is the one not showing his income taxes. Be sure not to call the kettle black. I'm voting for Clinton's policies, not what she does with her money. At least she is willing to reveal her tax returns! See this article about Trump's tax returns:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...b45_story.html

You people keep bashing Clinton on her lies and deceitfulness and what about the lies and deceitfulness of the GOP party and their representatives? It goes both ways. As I said before, I am voting for her policies and what they stand for, not what she does with her money.

More evidence of Sassy's PDPSD...Post Donkey Punch Stress Disorder.

Your in "good" company, Hillary and Assup have it too.

How do you know that what the Clinton Foundation does is illegal? Trump is the one not showing his income taxes. Be sure not to call the kettle black. I'm voting for Clinton's policies, not what she does with her money. At least she is willing to reveal her tax returns! See this article about Trump's tax returns:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...b45_story.html

You people keep bashing Clinton on her lies and deceitfulness and what about the lies and deceitfulness of the GOP party and their representatives? It goes both ways. As I said before, I am voting for her policies and what they stand for, not what she does with her money. Originally Posted by SassySue

I understand that. Just don't expect her to follow through.

I'm voting for Clinton's policies, not what she does with her money. At least she is willing to reveal her tax returns! See this article about Trump's tax returns:

.... what about the lies and deceitfulness of the GOP party and their representatives? It goes both ways. As I said before, I am voting for her policies and what they stand for, not what she does with her money. Originally Posted by SassySue

#1: What are her "policies" ... ? She is running on Bill's record.
#2: How about the records of her "Foundation" (contributors,amounts, and dates?)
#3: Did the lies and deceit of GOP put the U.S. at risk?
#4: How where she got her money (in the slush fund from which they live)?