Some more liberal values...

You are starting to get shrill here.
Another typical jd post. He uses the word, but not the concept or meaning.

Logic! Yes, that little bugaboo. If this bill passes (and it won't) then it will be illegal to sell NEW weapons of that type but since every transaction will require government approval how long before that approval stops coming? You know it will happen. Logic tells you the legal path to gun ownership will be sealed off, huh? Was that the same logic that told you to put all of your money into Enron? That is the difference between a right and a privilege. A right doesn't take permission. Then they can offer to buy back your weapon (which you can't sell) for a pittance of what it's worth. If you sell it anyway then you have committed a felony and you lose the right to own a gun completely. Want to try to argue that? Logic! Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

"They" and "Them" scare the shit out of you, don't they?
The portion of your post in red is stupid, contains a lie, and attempts to use bluster to intimidate other morons. A typical jd post.
Weapon buy-backs are frequently amnesty events. Which doesn't apply here.
If they offer to buy your weapon and you think the price is too low, don't sell it, stupid (part of the stupid).
Say they offer enough, it's illegal to sell it to them? That would be the lie. Of course it's legal to sell the weapon as long as you follow the law for doing so.
The statement "If you sell it anyway you have committed a felony" is very stupid (more of the stupid), very classic jd.
We finally make it to the bluster part. If you argue with him, and since logic is on his side (THATS sarcasm, jd) then....? Then,,,,? Bluster! Bluster!
So rather than argue with a moron, I will make a statement that ignores all of jd's hopes and dreams such as a complete breakdown of everything and includes his precious, but little used by him, logic.
If you attempt to sell any legally owned weapon using the method proscribed by the law, it will be legal to sell it.
Ignoring the truth and screaming "I'm right! I'm right! They're stealing our guns!" doesn't make it in the real world

FuckMunch squats to piss. So What!..bla bla bla...

I can't really decide if you're a complete idiot or just totally in the tank for Barry.

FuckMunch squats to piss. So What!..bla bla bla... Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

You know the only time I squat to piss is in your mouth.
And speaking of that, the $500 check you gave me for doing it bounced.

I can't really decide if you're a complete idiot or just totally in the tank for Barry. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

So only complete idiots or somebody totally in the tank can point out you are a liar, you're stupid, and you can't defend your statement with facts.
The only people that would defend you project their own inadequacies and just make you look all that more stupid.

So when will you address your mistakes.

Trick question. You could live to be twice sogs age and only cover 1995-2005

God, guns, and country. The left can't touch that. It would burn them. So much more but it repudiates anything Eva has to say. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You silly shits think you have the market cornered on that,The only diff in gun ownership between the two is the left leaning has more sense.

They bitterly cling to their god and guns. Who said that?

They bitterly cling to their god and guns. Who said that? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Who has made that quote other than you?

No one that I am aware of.

In my never ending attempt to have you accept at least one fact, Münchausenman, here is the quote:

But the truth is, is that, our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there’s not evidence of that in their daily lives. You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

That of course, was your Lord and Savior, Münchausenman, President Barack Obama.

http://www.youdecidepolitics.com/200...g-to-guns-god/

And the only ones who feel that way are conservatives? Bullshit.

Don't forget the secret hand gesture and say Obama, Blessed be his name. You don't want to go to a camp do you?

that is only for you superstitious bastards.

Feinstein is off her rocker now, Dumb slunt.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...ity-magazines/

During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on gun control Thursday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) shot down a proposed amendment to her “assault weapons” ban that would exempt military veterans from the gun ban. She also made some questionable claims.

Pushing a ban on high-capacity magazines, Feinstein argued that it is “legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines.”

Here’s her dubious rationale:

“The time has come, America, to step up and ban these weapons. The other very important part of this bill is to ban large capacity ammunition feeding devices, those that hold more than 10 rounds. We have federal regulations and state laws that prohibit hunting ducks with more than three rounds. And yet it’s legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines. Limiting magazine capacity is critical because it is when a criminal, a drug dealer, a deranged individual has to pause to change magazines and reload that the police or brave bystanders have the opportunity to take that individual down.”

During the same hearing, she also argued that a military veteran could be mentally ill and suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), therefore should be prevented from buying the semi-automatic weapons that would be banned in her bill.

The California Democrat also made the bizarre claim that the “advent of PTSD” is a “new phenomenon” and a “product of the Iraq war.”

Here’s exactly what she said in context: “The problem with expanding this is that, you know, with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War, it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this.”

Wow, its legal to hunt humans, who knew! Where do I sign up for the tags for human hunting, and how many tags can I get?
And PTSD is a new Iraqi phenomenon? The Vietnam and Korea Vets will be interested to hear this bit of new news.

Oh and for those that want to criticize the source rather than the content;

Did you ACTUALLY bump a thread that was 5 weeks old, CC?

Chit!

Did you ACTUALLY bump a thread that was 5 weeks old, CC?

Chit! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yea, but he 's a modtard... and diane dingleberry, wants to open up a new hunting season, all i want to know what is the daily bag limit? Lol

Better than starting a new thread on the same topic.