Reviews are very important,both the ones I write and the ones I read. A certain amount of detail is useful to a hobbyist in order to address the skill level of the provider. The rest of the story is all about attitude.If you are doing a half hour drive by with a girl who is all about getting you off and getting you gone,and I mean that in the best possible sense, sometimes a snack is what you want and not a full meal,a technical review is all you need.On the other hand, a review of a provider like Lily or Dana or Sidney is incomplete without addressing the attitude and interaction on a level above the pelvis. What you walk(or limp away)with is more than technical skill. These type of providers put more into their work than a technical review can express and speak more to the way you feel about them, and about yourself after the session
I read the rules for good reviews and sort of disregarded them awhile back. Let the reader take what they will from what I write. And if they don't like it f$$k em if they can't take a joke.I will read your review gladly, and find something that helps if it is only the information that at the conclusion of the date I am not wearing handcuffs I did not request. The best way to learn to write reviews is to write them, and a little helpful constructive critique from the learned is not bad.W
My only peeve is when the only thing I remember about a review is how long your penis(especially if longer than mine)and how many times you made them come,always open to conjecture since if every provider really came as often as we think they would be working for free. Just my two cents adjusted for inflation.