CBS reporter known for coverage of “Fast and Furious” scandal, had computer hacked.

Targeting reporters? 3 out of hundreds or thousands of journalists under investigation is targeting?

None of the 3 claiming harassment or sees themselves as being targeted.


Your argument is not sustained by anything the subject says.


Attkisson makes no accusations, allegations, or implies in any way that there is any harassment of any kind.


Your narrative has nothing to do with the article. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I guess we will have to see wheere this one goes, but I have a few comments to the above.

Targeting reporters? 3 out of hundreds or thousands of journalists under investigation is targeting?

Well, the Office in the Watergate Hotel complex was just one out of hundreds of thousands of offices. The problem was it involved very serious, criminal activity by people who were so full of themselves and thought themselves so far above the law that they thought they would get away with it.

None of the 3 claiming harassment or sees themselves as being targeted.

It sure seems like they feel they were targeted. Barry Hussein Obama and his henchmen are actually turning his greatest support source against him.

Your argument is not sustained by anything the subject says.

I believe the argument is sustained and supported by the reporter's beliefs and the context of Barry and company being caught in a list of wrong doing ( 3 crisis scandals and growing). It is the arrogant belief that they are superior and can get away with these abuses that will do them in.

Attkisson makes no accusations, allegations, or implies in any way that there is any harassment of any kind.

I read the suggestion of probable criminal activity. She is being "appropriate" and very careful. I do not blame her. These people are dangerous.

I guess time will reveal what is and will be.

Old Dingus

Neither Rosen or Attkisson are commenting on the current DOJ scandal; so it is a lie for MunchMouth to opine they do not "see themselves as being targeted". He is clueless as to what their state of mind is or isn't.

Unless he can provide a direct statement by either; MunchMouth is just blowing smoke.

And you know it to be otherwise, BIG GUY??????

Neither Rosen or Attkisson are commenting on the current DOJ scandal; so it is a lie for MunchMouth to opine they do not "see themselves as being targeted". He is clueless as to what their state of mind is or isn't.

Unless he can provide a direct statement by either; MunchMouth is just blowing smoke. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

A lie for me to opine something?

Can you explain to me how that works? This should be good.....unless he pusses out and says nothing.

You got it right that it is my opinion that they do not appear to see themselves as targeted.

You got it wrong to say it was a lie, For 2 obvious reasons.

If they have said nothing, you have no proof one way or the other as to how they feel.

Second, you recognized my statement as opinion. I didn't represent my opinion as fact. Me posting my opinion is not a lie.

How ironic for you to lie about lying.

You've been bitch slapped again.

Maybe one day you'll rate a punch.

You stated it as a fact !

Again, you didn't opine, but stated this to be fact !

Which it isn't...............if you want to retract your phony assertion that neither Attkisson or Rosen "sees themselves as being targeted"; then fine.....but if you don't then offer proof that backs up your claim !

No need to discuss any more until you provide more facts and less emotional rants !

None of the 3 claiming harassment or sees themselves as being targeted. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It sure seems like they feel they were targeted. Barry Hussein Obama and his henchmen are actually turning his greatest support source against him. Originally Posted by Old Dingus

Obama is not up for reelection, so they don't really need the media on their side any more, Mission already accomplished.

Obama is not up for reelection, so they don't really need the media on their side any more, Mission already accomplished. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

But Sir, don't you think any President needs Press Coverage that is as good, positive and beneficial as possible? Any President in his second term is going to have thoughts of his legacy.

I believe it is truthful to suggest the Press has gone very easy on Obama for some of the "issues" of his Presidency. They may now be less willing to allow that free pass.

I respect and appreciate the intelligent response without the name calling that has become part of so many responses.

Old Dingus

Obama is not up for reelection, so they don't really need the media on their side any more, Mission already accomplished. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Hey he and Shrub are both 1 for 1 with mission accomplished ...

Neither Rosen or Attkisson are commenting on the current DOJ scandal; so it is a lie for MunchMouth "to opine" they do not "see themselves as being targeted". He is clueless as to what their state of mind is or isn't.

Unless he can provide a direct statement by either; MunchMouth is just blowing smoke. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You clearly stated I opined ("to opine").

Again, you didn't opine, but stated this to be fact !

Which it isn't...............if you want to retract your phony assertion that neither Attkisson or Rosen "sees themselves as being targeted"; then fine.....but if you don't then offer proof that backs up your claim ! What proof do you have they do feel that way?

No need to discuss any more until you provide more facts and less emotional rants ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

First off, your repeated use of exclamation marks shows who is providing the emotional rant here.

First you say it was my opinion ("to opine"). Then you say I stated it as fact (Again, you didn't opine, but stated this to be fact ! ).

Which statement do you stand behind? Which one is a lie?

You lied in one of those statements since they are the opposite of each other.

While you attempt to talk your way out of that, I'll prove my point.

Whenever a shrink testifies in court about someone's mental state, it is his expert opinion. It is subjective. It is not considered fact. Many times there will be a doctor that offers up the opposite opinion. They have both given their opinion.

I gave my opinion. Nothing more or less.

The only thing I am claiming is that your reading comprehension has once again been called into question. Or is English your second language?
Please let us know.

Do you have anything to say that backs your position? Anything at all that is factual and not your opinion delivered as fact?

I didn't think so.

Ahhh, Whirlyturd seems to be getting smacked around a little more frequently and a lot harder than usual lately. Maybe it has something to do with Benghazi!

You stated it to be FACT; i re-casted it to be an opinion because it is impossible for you to know what the state of mind of either Attkisson or Rosen is..............you try to deflect from the issue; it aint' working.

But I am glad to see now are backing away from your original assertion..................... here is what you asserted........

"None of the 3 claiming harassment or sees themselves as being targeted."

You are clueless how these people "see themselves".............you got caught lying............own it !

Yyou got caught lying............own it ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

And you were repeatedly caught making the claim that "Wisconsin and America are Trending Romney."

.........Own it!

And you were repeatedly caught making the claim that "Wisconsin and America are Trending Romney."

.........Own it! Originally Posted by bigtex

Aren't you being hypocritically repetitious, BigKotex?

Ida Bell + whirly = repetitious