Mitt, Jeb say "Take down Confederate battle flag

12blue4u's Avatar
Not sure why the Flag of Continuing Slavery should be a controversy to be removed. Yea Yea spare me the states rights bullshit. It was all about the continuation of slaves as property. It was money. The south knew what it would cost if they actually had to pay people to work the fields and all the other tasks. Opps forgot historical truth is not allowed here.
Not sure why the Flag of Continuing Slavery should be a controversy to be removed. Yea Yea spare me the states rights bullshit. It was all about the continuation of slaves as property. It was money. The south knew what it would cost if they actually had to pay people to work the fields and all the other tasks. Opps forgot historical truth is not allowed here. Originally Posted by 12blue4u
It's easy to run a business when the employees aren't paid. Even Lusty Tard could make that shit fly.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 06-21-2015, 10:54 PM
I cannot think of another example of a separatist rebellion being defeated yet the flag of the defeated is allowed to fly.

Yes, it stood for slavery--among other things. Yes, a lot of honorable men died on both sides fighting for what they believed. But they were rebels and traitors who LOST. Not such flag should fly. Had the American revolution failed, would the stars and stripes be flying in Boston today?
I B Hankering's Avatar
The Mohammedans date a little farther back than the Ottoman Empire.

So no, you're completely wrong about something else. Tremendous surprise there.

Even MORE surprising is how you brought slavery into the thread.

Fucking idiot...
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
And the Ottomans ruled that region a little more recently and a great deal longer than Muhammad, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. And the Ottomans had an elite corps of slaves called "Janisarries" created from a levy on young Christian boys taken from European domains, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
So what does that have to do with the Turkish flag, which you erroneously related to SLOBBRIN's ignorant post, IBWiki?

LMAO @ The Original DOTY!
  • DSK
  • 06-22-2015, 12:25 AM
So what does that have to do with the Turkish flag, which you erroneously related to SLOBBRIN's ignorant post, IBWiki?

LMAO @ The Original DOTY! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
You are kinda touchy about being elected dipshit of the year, aren't you?
I cannot think of another example of a separatist rebellion being defeated yet the flag of the defeated is allowed to fly.

Yes, it stood for slavery--among other things. Yes, a lot of honorable men died on both sides fighting for what they believed. But they were rebels and traitors who LOST. Not such flag should fly. Had the American revolution failed, would the stars and stripes be flying in Boston today? Originally Posted by Old-T
Although I don't think we need to display it anymore. The Confederate flag never stood for slavery, racism or anything of that sort. Here's a link that explains it's real intended meaning.

Jim

http://www.trainweb.org/seaboard/FLA...derateflag.htm
Although I don't think we need to display it anymore. The Confederate flag never stood for slavery, racism or anything of that sort. Here's a link that explains it's real intended meaning.

Jim

http://www.trainweb.org/seaboard/FLA...derateflag.htm Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
This is just bullshit. It's like trying to say the swastika didn't stand for Nazis. I don't give a shit what the intended meaning was, it was co-opted by the confederacy and forever tarnished. Let it go.
This is just bullshit. It's like trying to say the swastika didn't stand for Nazis. I don't give a shit what the intended meaning was, it was co-opted by the confederacy and forever tarnished. Let it go. Originally Posted by WombRaider
It became tarnished by idiots like you. There's more racism up north than there is in the south. I know cause I've lived in both states.

Jim
It became tarnished by idiots like you. There's more racism up north than there is in the south. I know cause I've lived in both states.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Sweet Jeebus. I've heard it all now. You don't know shit from the mud in your eyes. It is tarnished because those who were fighting for an economy based around the enslavement of other human beings rose up and got their asses kicked and rightfully so.
Sweet Jeebus. I've heard it all now. You don't know shit from the mud in your eyes. It is tarnished because those who were fighting for an economy based around the enslavement of other human beings rose up and got their asses kicked and rightfully so. Originally Posted by WombRaider
As usual you make up your own stories. The civil war was not fought over slavery exclusively. In your mind all roads have to lead to racism or some other oppression.


Jim
As usual you make up your own stories. The civil war was not fought over slavery exclusively. In your mind all roads have to lead to racism or some other oppression.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Make up my own stories? Like racism is more prevalent in the north, because you've lived both places? You anecdotal dickhead. In my mind, all roads lead to the truth.

"The war had its origin in the fractious issue of slavery, especially the extension of slavery into the western territories."

"The first six to secede had the highest proportions of slaves in their populations, a total of 48.8% for the six"

Keep lying, dipshit.
Make up my own stories? Like racism is more prevalent in the north, because you've lived both places? You anecdotal dickhead. In my mind, all roads lead to the truth.

"The war had its origin in the fractious issue of slavery, especially the extension of slavery into the western territories."

"The first six to secede had the highest proportions of slaves in their populations, a total of 48.8% for the six"

Keep lying, dipshit. Originally Posted by WombRaider
Yes racism is more prevalent up North. The idea that racism is a Southern problem is just a myth that has been entrenched in the population. Like I said all roads lead to racism for atheist liberal jackasses like you.

Jim
Yes racism is more prevalent up North. The idea that racism is a Southern problem is just a myth that has been entrenched in the population. Like I said all roads lead to racism for atheist liberal jackasses like you.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
No one said racism was a southern only problem. That's where all roads lead to for conservative dicknips like you. The idea that it's more prevalent up north is something that you cannot prove, so therefore it's bullshit.

I'm proudly atheist. I don't believe in fairytales. Have you talked to yourself tonight? (that's what we call praying)
No one said racism was a southern only problem. That's where all roads lead to for conservative dicknips like you. The idea that it's more prevalent up north is something that you cannot prove, so therefore it's bullshit.

I'm proudly atheist. I don't believe in fairytales. Have you talked to yourself tonight? (that's what we call praying) Originally Posted by WombRaider
Well what kind of proof do you need? Lets at least start with population. Over 50% of blacks live in the Southern States according to the last U.S. Census. Blacks Americans are free to settle any where they like. If the Southern States are inherently vicious and racist towards blacks why do the majority of Black Americans remain in the Southern States? Like I stated before, all roads lead to racism. Liberals aren't happy without it. Liberals don't want racism to end. They need it. This country wouldn't have a race problem if liberals, atheists and gays would just shut the fuck up.

Jim