Since when is reaching 25% of a goal a success?

Old-T must be a politician or government worker if he really thinks reaching 25% of a stated goal constitutes a good job. Originally Posted by satexasguy

25-30% is a pretty standard mark up for most retail sales,

25-30% is a pretty standard mark up for most retail sales, Originally Posted by CJ7

... but that's above meeting the actual cost for the item, CBJ7. Making only 25-30% of cost equates to a 70-75% loss for a retailer, moron.

... but that's above meeting the actual cost for the item, CBJ7. Making only 25-30% of cost equates to a 70-75% loss for a retailer, moron.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

0 --- 7.5 million equate that percent

0 --- 7.5 million equate that percent Originally Posted by CJ7

That number in no manner represents the number of uninsured who actually enrolled in Odumbocare, a number somewhat closer to 2 or 3 million than it is to 7 million, CBJ7. Plus, CBJ7, you do this math:

"[A] McKinsey survey found that among those who were previously insured, 86 percent paid their first month’s premium; among those who were previously uninsured, only 53 percent had."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2014/03/27/white-house-announces-6-million-obamacare-sign-ups-but-number-of-uninsured-enrollees-remains-a-mystery/

That number in no manner represents the number of uninsured who actually enrolled in Odumbocare, a number somewhat closer to 2 or 3 million than it is to 7 million, CBJ7. Plus, CBJ7, you do this math:

"[A] McKinsey survey found that among those who were previously insured, 86 percent paid their first month’s premium; among those who were previously uninsured, only 53 percent had."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapoth...ins-a-mystery/ Originally Posted by I B Hankering

and sooner or later everyone that has health insurance will have a policy that complys with ACA standards, making all those policies NEW ... even yours.

deal with it

and sooner or later everyone that has health insurance will have a policy that complys with ACA standards, making all those policies NEW ... even yours.

deal with it Originally Posted by CJ7

Except, of course, those who were granted "exemptions" by ...

.. you know who .... before running for cover in civilian life.

The Martha Stewart of Health Care.

Except, of course, those who were granted "exemptions" by ...

.. you know who .... before running for cover in civilian life.

The Martha Stewart of Health Care. Originally Posted by LexusLover

No, who?

specifically ..

and sooner or later everyone that has health insurance will have a policy that complys with ACA standards, making all those policies NEW ... even yours.

deal with it Originally Posted by CJ7

You're an equivocating SOB, CBJ7, just like Odumbo. The goal of Odumbocare was to enroll the "uninsured", and so far, only two or three million of the formerly "uninsured" have been enrolled.

No, who?

specifically .. Originally Posted by CJ7

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...3-18&sp=-1&sk=

"Suckatary Sir-Libelous"

You know? Obaminable's Elf-in-Charge

only Veterans enrolled with the VA are exempt..

better hurry, you're late for JD;s math class

Old-T must be a politician or government worker if he really thinks reaching 25% of a stated goal constitutes a good job. Originally Posted by satexasguy

No, you intentionally illiterate poster. I'm just intelligent enough to know that every goal is equally realistic/attainable, and to tell that your post was nothing more than a RWW rant. You don't really think anyone intelligent found your OP to be useful, do you?

No, you intentionally illiterate poster. I'm just intelligent enough to know that every goal is equally realistic/attainable, and to tell that your post was nothing more than a RWW rant. You don't really think anyone intelligent found your OP to be useful, do you? Originally Posted by Old-T

OLD-Tyrant You are just pissed because you are part of the problem. LOL... http://twitchy.com/2014/04/11/freaky...ly-wrong-pics/

OLD-Tyrant You are just pissed because you are part of the problem. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

so are you, you're just too busy squeaking about it to notice

loosing their asses! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Freudan slip, LLIdiot?

I DONT'T THINK SO!

IBIdiot continues to bleat out the same call. RAND RAND RAND. But what does Merriam-Webster have to say?

You're wrong again Corpy. And you're making things up again.