Still waiting on time to do away with ISIL

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Link? Originally Posted by gnadfly
http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/11/1...ng-to-the-u-s/

it's 8 pages so it's a long read.

"Net Loss of 140,000 from 2009 to 2014; Family Reunification Top Reason for Return"
More Mexicans leaving than coming now according to Pew report. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
GOOD ! Maybe YOUR hero woomby will go back too. Maybe he can try that " freelance writing for travel brochures " over there and see how it goes. And of course, bring YOU along to comfort him when the Mexican editors reject his " writing " . YOU two can corner the 'holes market over there !
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
I'd like to see some documentation on how "We created ISIS."

We are never going to quit meddling in other countries' business. It's a matter of degree. Other countries aren't going to quit meddling in our business. Mexico meddles in our business simply by sending millions of "refugees" here.

I don't really care about the Syrian issue as long as the price of gas remains low and they are not raising the labor supply or govt costs significantly. Originally Posted by gnadfly
Actually, a CBS affiliate did a great report on how we created ISIS about 3 years ago. I'll find the link and try to post it. The idea was to surround and isolate Assad, and weaken him.
GOOD ! Maybe YOUR hero woomby will go back too. Maybe he can try that " freelance writing for travel brochures " over there and see how it goes. And of course, bring YOU along to comfort him when the Mexican editors reject his " writing " . YOU two can corner the 'holes market over there ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
Who will you stalk begging for him to let you suck his dick if he goes? Not me don't ask.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/11/1...ng-to-the-u-s/

it's 8 pages so it's a long read.

"Net Loss of 140,000 from 2009 to 2014; Family Reunification Top Reason for Return" Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
EIGHT PAGES IS A LONG READ?



Yep, might take you at good 15 minutes; 10 if you move your finger real fast!



Btw -- how about an update on this fascinating poll, JDrunk.
funfilled4ever's Avatar
I'm with this guy. There is NO war on terror. ISIS or ISIL or Daesh or whatever we're calling it this week is all a bunch of fake boogeyman bullcrap. Let the name calling begin....

http://sgtreport.com/2015/11/must-li...-s-and-israel/
I'm with this guy. There is NO war on terror. ISIS or ISIL or Daesh or whatever we're calling it this week is all a bunch of fake boogeyman bullcrap. Let the name calling begin....

http://sgtreport.com/2015/11/must-li...-s-and-israel/ Originally Posted by funfilled4ever
Meanwhile, back atop the "grassy knoll"..........
LexusLover's Avatar
The idea was to surround and isolate Assad, and weaken him. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Sounds like Carter training OBL's "merry men" in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets!

Two incompetents don't make a competent.
LexusLover's Avatar
Meanwhile, back atop the "grassy knoll".......... Originally Posted by Jackie S
... sandy knoll?
lustylad's Avatar
I'm with this guy. There is NO war on terror. ISIS or ISIL or Daesh or whatever we're calling it this week is all a bunch of fake boogeyman bullcrap. Let the name calling begin....

http://sgtreport.com/2015/11/must-li...-s-and-israel/ Originally Posted by funfilled4ever

Yikes! This kind of nonsense --and the fact that anyone actually listens to and believes it - frightens me much more than ISIS or Syrian refugees. You do know that RT (Russia Today) is Putin's media propaganda arm, right? You do know Putin is using misinformation to manipulate public opinion his way starting with far-right groups in Western countries, right? We need to wake up. If I was half as paranoid as you seem to be, I would say you're just a Putin plant.
.
funfilled4ever's Avatar
Oh yeah, for sure, I've got nothing better to do than trolling sites spreading my Putin propaganda, you got me ..... Lol, Good Lord. Maybe I need some more good ole' brainwashing from Fox, NBC, CNN.... apparently i haven't been set in front of the TV long enough with a good sodium pentathol drip going.
lustylad's Avatar
Ok then funfilled, fill us up with your "fun" stories.... instead of just saying "I'm with this guy" - please tell us exactly what YOU believe happened in Paris a week ago and what YOU think the brainwashing Western media isn't telling us.
.
Guest123018-4's Avatar
I do no think we created ISIS but believe we enabled them.
All we have that is different is a name.
These are radical Islamists that exist all over the world. They believe theirs is the only true way, that the way to achieve their goals of a one world caliphate is by jihad, that all non-believers and those that are not participating in jihad are infidels and must die, and Sharia law is the only law.

When it comes to this administration, we seem to have a very difficult time deciding what side we are on when we should b e deciding whther or not we should even be on a side.
Are we against Syria because they are a friend of Russia and Iran even though Syria is a secular nation that once kept the radicals under control? Syria does not like their Arab brother in Saudi and we know how they feel about the Jews. So when it comes to radical Islam, should we be the friend of our "enemy" or the friend of our "enemy". Radical Islam is fighting our enemy; who do we support. Is there a correct side to be on. Is Iran fucking Syria to death stabbing them in the back with one hand while patting it with the other. Iran is a caliphate, Syria is not.

Meanwhile, our trading partner, China is selling all of them weapons and we are carelessly leaving ours lying around or making bad deals as was exposed in Benghazi.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
EIGHT PAGES IS A LONG READ?



Yep, might take you at good 15 minutes; 10 if you move your finger real fast!



Btw -- how about an update on this fascinating poll, JDrunk. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
i didn't bother to read it. it listed 8 pages. i just posted the link for convenience. skimming over it today the last few pages stats and references.

but then again, since you think "reading comprehension" is "The Cat in the Hat" i imagine it would be quite difficult for you yeah?