Tell me a something ladies and gents......
If you knowingly knew a client had herpes HIV due to him telling you would you still proceed with the session covered?
Gents if you knowinglly knew a provider had herpes or HIV due to them telling you would you be comfortable going forward and seeking only covered services anyway?
If you answered no to either question since we don't rely on facts if a person is clean or heresay...........dont provide or patronize providers at all period......iits thee safest way............
Originally Posted by gimme_that
HIV it's very easy to prevent with almost 100% success through condom use. I still wouldn't do it because of the psychological aspect but from a risk perspective it would be fine.
Herpes no because of the failure of condoms to mitigate the risk and its transmission via skin to skin contact. Even though it's harder to transmit from female to male I still wouldn't do it.
Your logic is flawed to suggest that answering no means you shouldn't see providers regardless. The risks are not equivalent.
20% of all women have genital herpes. If she says she is clean the statistical likelihood is that 80% of the time that's a true statement.
If she says she has herpes, you just increased your likelihood from 20% to 100% that she's infected.