Geez, CBJ7, are you ever going to make a point? This thread is about the Obama administration using tax dollars to recruit people to consume tax dollars. What the hell are YOU talking about?!
Here is a link detailing Walmart employees on public assistanceMy point is that Hillary was on the Board of Directors, and was paid for it. The board approves company policies. Ergo, she was a partner in the crime.
Walmart Employees on public assistance
Some excerpts
"In state after state, the largest group of Medicaid recipients is Walmart employees. I'm sure that the same thing is true of food stamp recipients. Each Walmart ‘associate’ costs the taxpayers an average of more than $1,000 in public assistance," Grayson wrote in a Huffington Post column on Nov. 24, 2012.
And in Pennsylvania, a 2006 Philadelphia Inquirer investigation revealed the company had the highest percentage of employees enrolled in Medicaid. One in six of Walmart’s 48,000 Pennsylvania employees were enrolled in Medicaid, costing the state about $15 million a year (it’s likely higher because the Inquirer’s story did not cover employees’ dependents on Medicaid, or any other public assistance such as food stamps). Originally Posted by BigLouie
My point is that Hillary was on the Board of Directors, and was paid for it. The board approves company policies. Ergo, she was a partner in the crime. Originally Posted by Jewish LawyerTo try to pin the Walmart policies on her is beyond laughable. What about the Walton family? You have no documentation on her standing on the policy or how she voted on it. And she "was" she is no longer and the policy was there before and after. Why don't you just admit you hate her and will try to pin anything and everyone on her no matter the facts.
Here is a link detailing Walmart employees on public assistance
Walmart Employees on public assistance
Some excerpts
"In state after state, the largest group of Medicaid recipients is Walmart employees. I'm sure that the same thing is true of food stamp recipients. Each Walmart ‘associate’ costs the taxpayers an average of more than $1,000 in public assistance," Grayson wrote in a Huffington Post column on Nov. 24, 2012.
And in Pennsylvania, a 2006 Philadelphia Inquirer investigation revealed the company had the highest percentage of employees enrolled in Medicaid. One in six of Walmart’s 48,000 Pennsylvania employees were enrolled in Medicaid, costing the state about $15 million a year (it’s likely higher because the Inquirer’s story did not cover employees’ dependents on Medicaid, or any other public assistance such as food stamps). Originally Posted by BigLouie
Here's the article you cut and pasted that quote from, even though you didn't cite your source and expected us to believe those are your words. Been hanging out with WPF, eh, CBJ7?
What makes this more interesting is the fact that your post bears no relevance to thread topic. So you wasted a good plagiarism.
http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/rules/L...tion/about.htm Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
The problem with Walmart is that they go into medium to small communities and destroy their economic Eco-system and then close shop leaving behind a devastated community. The Walmart plan is what a lot of companies are doing and it is a trend that has been going on for 30 years. No president is at fault and none can stop it Originally Posted by BigLouieSo, because no one can stop the crime Hillary was a party to, she gets away with it?