About me:
I am low volume
I am 'cheap'
I have many great reviews
I maintain myself well
I live almost an hour outside of the nearest city....my incall is a cheap but decent and clean hotel...I can not always drive to the city without advance notice. Escorting is the only thing that I do for money, but I have an SO that supports me. All of those great reviews? Submitted by a group of great gentlemen that knows I am worth it...they write them up to help me with my low volume. They know I struggle to get even 3 dates a week.
So am I breaking some kind of a mold here? I seem to go against what most think. Sometimes, when a lady enjoys what she does, there can be good deals. Less money does not always mean less quality, or higher volume.
I think like most things, YMMV!
- Tiffany Cums
- 04-19-2010, 08:32 PM
- am-a-pleaser
- 04-19-2010, 09:33 PM
I agree with most of what you have to say. I'm not really UTR and I don't have a day job. Well a job that pays money. I do other things. Yet, I am still low volume.Ansley has caught my sttention for a number of different reasons. My impression is----if she perceives time with me will be enjoyable, I may be the only one she sees that day. She has a budget. I hope to meet her budget for the day so hopefully she will consider that, too, in making an appointment with me.
I am able to count on one hand how many times I have seen two men in one day. Even when I travel I only see one person a day. Originally Posted by Ansley
If you really want low volume for the day, book her for all day.
- ForumPoster
- 04-19-2010, 09:49 PM
Up untill recently I had a full time job and would see my dates after 9pm or on weekends. It did present scheduling and contact problems, but never "too exausted" problem.
Consider a gal that has been up since 6a, deals with a full day of work, traffic then prettying herself up for you and meets you at say 8 or 9p. Yeah, you get to go first & she's by anyone's definition low volume but she's is exhausted! Who knows what kind of day she had at work. Work is stressful.
Originally Posted by atlcomedy
As a matter of fact I find it extremely energizing to scoot home, take a long bath, put on pretty dress and make up and hurry to my date.
There is something very 007 and naughty about it
Now I work part time and have to admit scheduling became a bit easier.
I am now able to schedule overnights during the week as well as have more time to dedicate to my other interests.
On subject of touring ladies ... if a lady is leaving enough time between her dates to shower, grab a bite and recharge - what difference does it make if you are 1st or 4th appointment of the day?
Lina
- Ansley
- 04-19-2010, 10:19 PM
- npita
- 04-19-2010, 11:06 PM
Ultimately it is about the quality of the session.Sure, but unless I knew I was the first person that day, it wasn't a quality session for me and I got tired of doing morning sessions. Finding a part time provider with a regular day job seemed to be the best way to get what I considered low volume. I saw one provider regularly for a while before I stopped hobbying and the fact that she worked during the day did not affect the quality of the sessions. Since I also wanted her to be able to extend the visit if I wanted to extend it, I just asked her how much time I had to schedule as a minimum to have that option.
- SneakyCancer
- 04-20-2010, 01:19 AM
high or low....one can never truly know unless they are letting themselves show it. if a woman can have a baby and then work her muscles back to the pre-baby hole size, there is no way in hell that ten dicks a day will wear it out....
all about being in shape and taking care of oneself. worse case a provider is tired and sore....tell tell sign...they are in the business of making us feel good at a cost. Sure many have lives to live and therefore probably limit themselves to better blend in vs sticking out.
hats off to the ones that hobby with full time jobs. im tired enuff with just thinking about who to call next.
all about being in shape and taking care of oneself. worse case a provider is tired and sore....tell tell sign...they are in the business of making us feel good at a cost. Sure many have lives to live and therefore probably limit themselves to better blend in vs sticking out.
hats off to the ones that hobby with full time jobs. im tired enuff with just thinking about who to call next.
- LAVixian
- 04-20-2010, 01:42 AM
It really doesn't matter if providers say they are low volume or high volume... if an individual wants that much attention and dedication centered on themselves.... well, it would probably be best to just go get an SO.At least that way one would know for sure they were getting no leavings. No offense intended to anyone.
- Laurentius
- 04-20-2010, 09:21 AM
In terms of sheer performance, I really don't think volume is a determining factor. It all depends on the woman and her attitude. Some get energized and can be really "on" when seeing several guys a day. In such a case, in terms of performance, you might be better off being #4 that day than the only guy that day.
Then there are others who will do one appointment, and do it well.
In terms of linkage to performance, it simply is not generalizable. Volume doesn't matter -- the woman does. It all comes down to her. She knows herself better than anyone; and when she does things the way things best work for her; the client benefits.
Where volume COULD matter, and I know I'll catch some heat for this, is in STD safety.
There is no such thing as safe sex. There is only safER sex. The use of condoms greatly diminishes but does not eliminate risk.
Volume matters in this regard because of sheer statistics. I will illustrate using a classic game as an example.
Pretend you have a 6-shot revolver with five chambers loaded pointed at your head.
Your odds of surviving the first pull of the trigger are 1 in 6. Your odds of surviving both the first AND second pull of the trigger are 1 in 36. Your odds of surviving three pulls of the trigger are 1 in 216. This is sex without a condom.
For sex with a condom, which is only safER, not safe; pretend the revolver has only one out of six chambers loaded. Your odds of surviving the first pull of the trigger are 5 out of 6. (1:1.2) Not bad. Your odds of surviving both the first AND second pull of the trigger are 1 out of 1.44. Your odds of surviving three pulls of the trigger in a row are 1 in 1.72
Obviously, because of the higher safety with a condom, the odds against you creep up much more slowly based on volume (number of shots) than they would without one. Nevertheless they DO creep up. It is a simple matter of reality. Not everyone who smokes gets lung cancer; but your odds of getting lung cancer are far greater if you smoke 4 packs a day than if you smoked one cigarette once when you were 14.
This does NOT mean that a high volume provider has an STD. As I said, because of the higher safety factor, the risk with additional volume climbs up SLOWLY.
In addition, using safER sex practices, and dealing with a PROFESSIONAL who knows what the hell she is doing, has sound ethics, and cares about her health; that risk climbs even more slowly. Perhaps so slowly as to be practically indistinguishable from low volume.
Again, I am speaking of odds here. The reality is that, in Massachusetts, something like 40% of women contract some form of HPV with their very first sexual encounter; according to Planned Parenthood. So you COULD get an STD from a woman who has seen only one other man in her life -- both times using condoms. (HPV can be spread with condoms in use.)
In other words, even though statistics indicate a greater margin of safety with a lower volume provider, your best bet is to consider a provider's ETHICS moreso than her volume. Her ethics have a greater impact.
Then there are others who will do one appointment, and do it well.
In terms of linkage to performance, it simply is not generalizable. Volume doesn't matter -- the woman does. It all comes down to her. She knows herself better than anyone; and when she does things the way things best work for her; the client benefits.
Where volume COULD matter, and I know I'll catch some heat for this, is in STD safety.
There is no such thing as safe sex. There is only safER sex. The use of condoms greatly diminishes but does not eliminate risk.
Volume matters in this regard because of sheer statistics. I will illustrate using a classic game as an example.
Pretend you have a 6-shot revolver with five chambers loaded pointed at your head.
Your odds of surviving the first pull of the trigger are 1 in 6. Your odds of surviving both the first AND second pull of the trigger are 1 in 36. Your odds of surviving three pulls of the trigger are 1 in 216. This is sex without a condom.
For sex with a condom, which is only safER, not safe; pretend the revolver has only one out of six chambers loaded. Your odds of surviving the first pull of the trigger are 5 out of 6. (1:1.2) Not bad. Your odds of surviving both the first AND second pull of the trigger are 1 out of 1.44. Your odds of surviving three pulls of the trigger in a row are 1 in 1.72
Obviously, because of the higher safety with a condom, the odds against you creep up much more slowly based on volume (number of shots) than they would without one. Nevertheless they DO creep up. It is a simple matter of reality. Not everyone who smokes gets lung cancer; but your odds of getting lung cancer are far greater if you smoke 4 packs a day than if you smoked one cigarette once when you were 14.
This does NOT mean that a high volume provider has an STD. As I said, because of the higher safety factor, the risk with additional volume climbs up SLOWLY.
In addition, using safER sex practices, and dealing with a PROFESSIONAL who knows what the hell she is doing, has sound ethics, and cares about her health; that risk climbs even more slowly. Perhaps so slowly as to be practically indistinguishable from low volume.
Again, I am speaking of odds here. The reality is that, in Massachusetts, something like 40% of women contract some form of HPV with their very first sexual encounter; according to Planned Parenthood. So you COULD get an STD from a woman who has seen only one other man in her life -- both times using condoms. (HPV can be spread with condoms in use.)
In other words, even though statistics indicate a greater margin of safety with a lower volume provider, your best bet is to consider a provider's ETHICS moreso than her volume. Her ethics have a greater impact.
- LAVixian
- 04-20-2010, 11:05 AM
Laurentius , you won't recieve any heat off of myself because I agree with you on this topic. A person's ethics and morals will definately play a part in this. Thanks for bringing it up, alot of folks don't think about this aspect.
- am-a-pleaser
- 04-20-2010, 07:46 PM
- Tiffany Cums
- 04-20-2010, 07:48 PM
- terbul
- 04-21-2010, 08:56 AM
[quote=Laurentius;248223]
Pretend you have a 6-shot revolver with five chambers loaded pointed at your head.
Your odds of surviving the first pull of the trigger are 1 in 6. Your odds of surviving both the first AND second pull of the trigger are 1 in 36. Your odds of surviving three pulls of the trigger are 1 in 216. This is sex without a condom.
quote]
If you don’t re-spin the cylinder each trigger pull the odds of surviving the second pull when 5 of 6 chambers are loaded are 0 (if you survive the first).
If you re-spin, each pull is an independent event and the odds don’t change; 1 in 6 each time. It’s the same as the coin toss problem.
Pretend you have a 6-shot revolver with five chambers loaded pointed at your head.
Your odds of surviving the first pull of the trigger are 1 in 6. Your odds of surviving both the first AND second pull of the trigger are 1 in 36. Your odds of surviving three pulls of the trigger are 1 in 216. This is sex without a condom.
quote]
If you don’t re-spin the cylinder each trigger pull the odds of surviving the second pull when 5 of 6 chambers are loaded are 0 (if you survive the first).
If you re-spin, each pull is an independent event and the odds don’t change; 1 in 6 each time. It’s the same as the coin toss problem.
- Laurentius
- 04-21-2010, 09:27 AM
[If you re-spin, each pull is an independent event and the odds don’t change; 1 in 6 each time. It’s the same as the coin toss problem. Originally Posted by terbulAgreed that, for each individual event, the odds (with re-spin) are identical. But aggregated odds of serial events are calculated differently.
While your odds of heads or tails is the same for each toss; your odds of getting heads 100 times in a row is way less than 50/50. :-)
- npita
- 04-21-2010, 11:51 AM
Agreed that, for each individual event, the odds (with re-spin) are identical. But aggregated odds of serial events are calculated differently.Uh the difference is that the two questions are different questions. If you ask, ``what are my odds of surviving three trigger pulls with 5 of the 6 chambers loaded, '' then assuming you spin the barrel each time, the odds are, (1/6)^3 = 1 in 216. If you pull the trigger and succeed, then obviously, the next time you spin and pull, your odds are 1 in 6 for the next pull.