Beautiful babies. Originally Posted by Yssup Riderugly babies
So what. Maybe sweet little Jill gave Vlad a boner. World piece is better than war. Stein didn't take any votes from Clinton she only got about 3%, it was Gary Johnson who did he got 6% and you voted for him.My vote in Red Texas had nothing to do with the outcome.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
And you voted for Perot.Nope...I voted for Bush in '92. He was one of the better Presidents we ever had. Him dunking his head in a soup bowl in Japan hurt him....that and the read my lips.
Grow the fuck up Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
Did you read the article?This is laughable! Based on the absurd assumption that if Stein wasn't on the ballot, her supporters would have voted 100% for hildebeest... instead of staying home or casting protest votes for Trump. Just another libtard rationalization for their loss. Anything to avoid admitting they had a terrible candidate.
(Stein did well enough to help Russia achieve its aims. Her vote totals in the crucial states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan were all greater than Clinton's margin of defeat, and arguably denied Clinton an Electoral College victory.) Originally Posted by WTF
This is laughable! Based on the absurd assumption that if Stein wasn't on the ballot, her supporters would have voted 100% for hildebeest... instead of staying home or casting protest votes for Trump. Just another libtard rationalization for their loss. Anything to avoid admitting they had a terrible candidate. Originally Posted by lustylad
You baby loving liar....I've never not said Clinton was a terrible choice. That does not mean I deny teality.Did YOU read your own article? Re-read the part you quoted in post #17 that stupidly claims "(Stein's) vote totals... arguably cost Clinton an Electoral College victory." That's what I responded to. You missed your OWN point, you comprehension-challenged moron!
Trump was/is flawed too.
You once again are missing the point, several really. Originally Posted by WTF
Did YOU read your own article? Re-read the part you quoted in post #17 that stupidly claims "(Stein's) vote totals... arguably cost Clinton an Electoral College victory." That's what I responded to. You missed your OWN point, you comprehension-challenged moron!The fucking article said arguably. And arguably, it did.
And what is "teality"? Tea party reality? Of course you don't deny it, you tea-bagging twat! Originally Posted by lustylad
I don't think Gary johnson was a factor, even tho he got 6%.Of course he didn't .WTF needs to be shown how ridiculous his assumption is.
It depends on which was state was a factor. I don't think the the vote total was enough to swing things in gary's favor to have an effect. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm