What is your third option ? All I have heard from the party of NO is no, but no third option. Unless you are really for military intervention. Originally Posted by i'va biggenTell them go fuck themselves, put more sanctions on them, put the military option on the plate, ramp up our military, join in maneuvers with Saudi, Isreal, France, Germany, UK, test a few new nukes of our own, start supporting Irans opposition from with in. Let all that sink in and then ask them if they want to renogiate. But don't ever tell them the military option is off the table.
I think, and many do, that Obama is negotiating a weak (bad for USA) deal.I asked your dumb ass once what the other option was, and you said to negotiate . You are a typical right wing nut and talk in circles.
It speaks to your stupidity if you think there are only 3 choices =
Do nothing and let Iran get nukes
Go to war
Accept Obama's deal Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Tell them go fuck themselves, put more sanctions on them, put the military option on the plate, ramp up our military, join in maneuvers with Saudi, Israel , France, Germany, UK, test a few new nukes of our own, start supporting Iran's opposition from with in. Let all that sink in and then ask them if they want to renegotiate . But don't ever tell them the military option is off the table. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama50 years of sanctions worked so well you want to impose more?
I asked your dumb ass once what the other option was, and you said to negotiate . You are a typical right wing nut and talk in circles.
50 years of sanctions worked so well you want to impose more? Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Where do you get 50 years? I'm not sure when they started working on the nukes but I'm pretty sure it has been in the last 20 years.Sanctions dolly think sanctions not nukes.
And I also suggested more than just sanctions. My point being...Rather walk out, beef up the pressure and try going back to the table with a little more back bone. As they say, no deal is better than a bad deal.
And please don't come back with "It's this deal or war" that's BS. No one wants a war. If BO doesn't know what he's doing then don't blame others. Any other plans or opinions are always automatically dismissed by this President. He should be consulting with leaders from both parties before making a deal. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
Sanctions dolly think sanctions not nukes. Originally Posted by i'va biggenTry putting together a coherent sentence. Punctuational might help.
Try putting together a coherent sentence. Punctuational might help.True hasn't been that long first were in 1979 followed by more in 1995 added on in 2006. They are at the table the agreement hasn't even been written and signed so how can you tell if it is a bad one ???
That is always a good fallback position.
I believe we've had sanctions on them since they took over our embassy in the mid 70s but that was less than 50 years ago but more were applied when they started their nuke program..perhaps you should focus on my total answer to you questions rather than quibbling about sanctions not working. After all it was sanctions that got to the table this last time..maybe we should try putting the fear of God in them for the next go around? We need a better deal with them and BO needs to stop worrying about his legacy cause at the rate he's going his legacy will be a mushroomed shaped cloud.. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
True hasn't been that long first were in 1979 followed by more in 1995 added on in 2006. They are at the table the agreement hasn't even been written and signed so how can you tell if it is a bad one ??? Originally Posted by i'va biggenIf we allow the Iranians nuclear capability and production, and their leaders are chanting "Death to America", you should be able to tell if it is a bad deal or not.
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB