Arrested for blowing Prostitution Sting!

"The faux hooker....."

..............i mean REALLY?!?!?!

Sad case of affairs… that was the last spot I knew of for a quick .20 bng drive by 4 work

I guess that is the same charge as warning about a speed trap.

Did you see that guy theres no way he gets a good lawyer and this is texas justice system dont give breaks

Did you see that guy theres no way he gets a good lawyer and this is texas justice system dont give breaks Originally Posted by Apitt12

He looks like a typical mid-40's concerned citizen and probably a real nice guy. He deserves a pat on the back for not stopping the warnings when told to do so by the police.

There are enough burglaries and car jackings going on to justify more attention.Hell, why not give more tickets for following too close on the freeways? That would be much more lucrative than trying to trap and ticket some folks just wanting to have fun.


[soap box]

He is going to get paid is whats gonna happen.

Where's the ACLU when you need them?

Earlier this month(last week?) an Apple store(Knox St.) customer beat the shit out of another Apple store customer for abusing the help. The cops gave him a TICKET for "assault." No cuffs, no jail. Look it up. It was funny. He told the guy "I don't work here and I don't have to be nice to you" and threw the little bitch(male) out on the sidewalk in front.

And they put this guy in LSJC for four days for a shout out? Originally Posted by ftango4

I looked it up but couldn't find it. I didn't look too long though.

Look at subsection c and d...reason why they get you for something else. It's not a black thing. They do this to a bunch of white people too warning against speed traps but they normally make up a some charge that will stick...ie holding a sign in the street. In his case probably loitering or disturbing the peace.



§ 38.15. INTERFERENCE WITH PUBLIC DUTIES. (a) A person
commits an offense if the person with criminal negligence
interrupts, disrupts, impedes, or otherwise interferes with:
(1) a peace officer while the peace officer is
performing a duty or exercising authority imposed or granted by
law;
(2) a person who is employed to provide emergency
medical services including the transportation of ill or injured
persons while the person is performing that duty;
(3) a fire fighter, while the fire fighter is fighting
a fire or investigating the cause of a fire;
(4) an animal under the supervision of a peace
officer, corrections officer, or jailer, if the person knows the
animal is being used for law enforcement, corrections, prison or
jail security, or investigative purposes;
(5) the transmission of a communication over a
citizen's band radio channel, the purpose of which communication is
to inform or inquire about an emergency; or
(6) an officer with responsibility for animal control
in a county or municipality, while the officer is performing a duty
or exercising authority imposed or granted under Chapter 821 or
822, Health and Safety Code.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor.
(c) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(1)
that the conduct engaged in by the defendant was intended to warn a
person operating a motor vehicle of the presence of a peace officer
who was enforcing Subtitle C, Title 7, Transportation Code.
(d) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that
the interruption, disruption, impediment, or interference alleged
consisted of speech only.
(e) In this section, "emergency" means a condition or
circumstance in which an individual is or is reasonably believed by
the person transmitting the communication to be in imminent danger
of serious bodily injury or in which property is or is reasonably
believed by the person transmitting the communication to be in
imminent danger of damage or destruction.

Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1162, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989.
Renumbered from V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 38.16 by Acts 1990, 71st
Leg., 6th C.S., ch. 12, § 2(26), eff. Sept. 6, 1990. Renumbered
from V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 38.18 and amended by Acts 1993, 73rd
Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994. Amended by Acts 1997,
75th Leg., ch. 165, § 30.241, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 2005,
79th Leg., ch. 1212, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2005.

of course...why would you...


SKULDUGGERY
OF THE WEEK
Even Genius Bars Need Bouncers Sometimes

At 8:45 p.m. on Wednesday, a complaint led to an altercation between customers at the Apple store in the 3000 block of Knox Street. The incident began after a man became upset with employees at the store about customer service. Another customer then intervened and told him, “I don’t work here, so I don’t have to be nice to you.” The intervener then grabbed the complainer by his coat and threw him out the front door. His aggression earned him a citation for assault.

My Hero♡