McCarthy war right about you commies, little ekimomo https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...%20was%20right
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
New avatar whiffy?
McCarthy war right about you commies, little ekimomo https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...%20was%20right
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Jonathan Chait Puts Bag Over Head, HuffPo Lights It On Firehttp://www.osborneink.com/2012/03/jo...t-on-fire.html
MARCH 21, 2012 BY MATT OSBORNE 3 COMMENTS
Jonathan Chait is not normally given to hyperbole. But it is telling that his New York Magazine essay a few weeks ago on the sources of liberal discontent with Obama didn’t make the masthead at Huffington Post, while “How Obama Tried to Sell Out Liberalism in 2011″ did on Monday. As I keep saying, the internet rewards instant poutrage over context or analysis; I just didn’t expect it from Chait, and I had thought the story of Republican debt ceiling brinkmanship had been set long ago by…well, Republican debt ceiling brinkmanship.
Chait was reacting to this Washington Post piece about the debt ceiling battle, specifically the point where the president was closest to a deal with Speaker of the House John Boehner. The sticking point was revenue:
It's interesting where you get your crap from, ekimomo the "Independent" from the bowels of LBJ...If the thought police are here then you are in no danger whiffy.
Jonathan Chait Puts Bag Over Head, HuffPo Lights It On Fire
http://www.osborneink.com/2012/03/jo...t-on-fire.html
(: Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
So, LittleLiberalEva, do you think the government should criminalize speech in opposition to climate change? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyOMG Tonto trolling is your only place in life? You have replaced gay rey/woomby for being my stalker. I will have to hand signal so if I stop too quick your nose won't go up my ass.
OMG Tonto trolling is your only place in life? You have replaced gay rey/woomby for being my stalker. I will have to hand signal so if I stop too quick your nose won't go up my ass. Originally Posted by i'va biggenApparently you cannot answer a simple question which in reality shakes the foundation of our Republic.
I'm not sure whether or not I agree with the entire scope of the subpoena, because it does seem to be asking for quite a bit, but the subpoena is for documents that deal with their communications and efforts with Exxon Mobile in relation to a criminal fraud investigation. The state is given broad powers of discovery in such cases.Are any of the true investors in Exxon alleging fraud? I've owned their stock for years and made plenty of money, plus I want them to continue to search for oil and sell gasoline. So, the fraud charge based upon a securities case is lame and actually contrary to the interests of the stockholders.
The reality is that there is strong evidence that Exxon may have deliberately suppressed their own findings about CO2 and climate change to investors (ie committed fraud). This is in connection with this investigation.
Realize that the claim that they are doing this just to intimidate CEI is nothing more than a conspiracy theory. Originally Posted by eatfibo
Are any of the true investors in Exxon alleging fraud? I've owned their stock for years and made plenty of money, plus I want them to continue to search for oil and sell gasoline. So, the fraud charge based upon a securities case is lame and actually contrary to the interests of the stockholders. Originally Posted by DSKIt doesn't matter. If the company intentionally hides risks from its investors, which climate change certainly would be, then it can be fraud. Whether or not any investors want to and are willing to bring a lawsuit doesn't change the fact that they broke the law.
OMG Tonto trolling is your only place in life? You have replaced gay rey/woomby for being my stalker. I will have to hand signal so if I stop too quick your nose won't go up my ass. Originally Posted by i'va biggen