Sandy Foxxx...bait and switch or double booker?

I have a real "thing" for skinny, slender-hipped, flat chested ladies. They really get my motor going, and feature prominently in my private fantasies.

I also enjoy the company of ladies who are more voluptuous. I've had many a pleasant encounter with these ladies, but they aren't generally what I picture during my "special alone time".

I schedule a session with a lady resembling the former. I'm in communication with her leading up to our meeting, and the anticipation is growing, and at the last minute, I'm told I can't see her, but can see a lady resembling the latter instead.

After the build-up, it could certainly be considered a downgrade, because of what I had anticipated. Bait and switch is certainly applicable.

All the above is for illustrative purposes only. IRL, LNK likes hips he can get hold of, and if her tits will wrap around little LNK, it's on.

All the above is for illustrative purposes only. IRL, LNK likes hips he can get hold of, and if her tits will wrap around little LNK, it's on.
__________________
I too have a thing for the small tities. But have found Russian nearly impossible. Pointers??
I wonder if the girls know how much reverse resheach goes into picking who we want to spend our time with?

That's a very strong word

Yeah, shot from the hip on that one. Let's leave it at that.

I too have a thing for the small tities. But have found Russian nearly impossible. Pointers??
I wonder if the girls know how much reverse resheach goes into picking who we want to spend our time with? Originally Posted by big country

In my experience, when attempting Russian with ladies who have not been overly blessed in the mammary area, it's best if they recline on pillows, so that their shoulders are higher than their hips, while I kneel over their torso and do most of the work. If they will squeeze in with their elbows and shoulders, placing their hands on my chest, we can achieve the desired result.

Or, squeeze in with shoulders, and use hands to hold little LNK where he should be, and give manual stimulation, too.

Or a combination thereof.

But, as I said, as I don't actually have a "thing" for flat-chested women, it's best when they have enough to wrap around without having to resort to extreme measures.

HTH.

And I don't know if the ladies have any clue.

I sometimes wonder if there is any research done by a lot of guys. Seems a lot of times it's: "Hm. I'm horny. *clickety-click* backpage.com. Oooo, shiny! *dialing* . . ."

For illustrative purpose, under the same scenario, here's someone else I'd consider a downgrade:

http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=156032

For illustrative purpose, under the same scenario, here's someone else I'd consider a downgrade:

http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=156032 Originally Posted by Stanfeld

+1. Beautiful, but not quite what I have in mind.

For illustrative purpose, under the same scenario, here's someone else I'd consider a downgrade:

http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=156032 Originally Posted by Stanfeld

Too muscular for my liking

So I finally took the plunge and decided to see Sandy Foxxx tonight and she totally flaked on me. I got all the way to the hotel and she even gave me the room number but she wouldn't answer thee door. It was really awkward standing in front of hotel door for like 5 min knocking like an idiot. I called and texted her a couple times and she didn't pick up. Really strange, how are you going to give someone your room number then not answer the door.

Sandy is still in KC this week? I thought she left.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1032275&highl ight=

...I'm trying to figure out how she was a downgrade. That's a very strong word considering these women have only two visual differences. Originally Posted by Tiffani Jameson

You are certainly entitled to your opinion.

I see that he chose to answer your inquiry, but he (Stanfeld) owed you no explanation other than that was how he felt about the comparison between the two girls, in my opinion. It is his coin and he can chose to drop it wherever and with whomever he wants and he can make that decision with his own criteria and only one physical difference if he chooses to do so.

I feel the key issue in this thread isn't whether one girl is a downgrade compared to another (which is a separate concern), it is that the girls and/or their manager/pimp are baiting and switching while they overbook. This behavior has been looked at with significant disdain and avoidance in the past. Will it be in this case?

I thought Sandy went back to Dallas already ?

You are certainly entitled to your opinion.

I see that he chose to answer your inquiry, but he (Stanfeld) owed you no explanation other than that was how he felt about the comparison between the two girls, in my opinion. It is his coin and he can chose to drop it wherever and with whomever he wants and he can make that decision with his own criteria and only one physical difference if he chooses to do so.

I feel the key issue in this thread isn't whether one girl is a downgrade compared to another (which is a separate concern), it is that the girls and/or their manager/pimp are baiting and switching while they overbook. This behavior has been looked at with significant disdain and avoidance in the past. Will it be in this case? Originally Posted by scorpio31

In some of her showcase pictures, it looks like they were taken at different times.
In some, she does not look like she weighs 120. In the others, she does look good.
I agree, if the man does not like what he sees, it's his choice. Personally, I would accept the smaller version, but not the other one.

When I clicked on the link and saw the first picture in her showcase my first reaction was WTF!. I never looked at her other pics. The two ladies are not even remotely similar based on that picture. Anyone participating in a 'bait and switch' doesn't deserve much consideration. And that's all I have to say about that.

When I clicked on the link and saw the first picture in her showcase my first reaction was WTF!. I never looked at her other pics. The two ladies are not even remotely similar based on that picture. Anyone participating in a 'bait and switch' doesn't deserve much consideration. And that's all I have to say about that. Originally Posted by Stanfeld

Stanfeld,

I completely understand. The first pic is very misleading. And looking at her ad, there are some marked differences. When you said you shot from the hip, and gave the example, I was done with it. I just haven't had the time to respond until now. I'm not afraid to say that I too jumped the gun. You'll find that I'm more reasonable than not. I hope we're friends again.

As far as the young lady's scheduling practices are concerned, there's any multitude of possibilities there. They could just be friends who endeavored into this together, or have an assistant, or even management. Either way, I'm not condoning double booking.

I think we're all shooting from the hip, as we all tend to do in these cases. The 'alternate' has 21 positive reviews, and no one has spoke negatively about her. Usually, if there is a TCB problem with one, there's a problem with all parties involved. I think that we're forgetting that Miss Foxxx is a very young new girl, and possibly testing the limits on what she can get away with. I'm sure she'll get it together.

I thought Sandy went back to Dallas already ? Originally Posted by KCAsianDude

I talked to her last night, who knows maybe she was in Dallas already telling me to go to a KC hotel. These girls are ridiculous.