..........
First...please use periods. Maybe Paige can give you one of her's.
(Just a joke, folks) Too soon?
But really, 103 words in a sentence makes you sound like a rambling idiot. It's tough to read AND almost impossible to take a mountain of illogically placed run-on sentences seriously.
Second, what the hell makes you think those of us that speak highly of her - or any other provider, for that matter - are doing so in exchange for free pussy? Is it possible that we're just not all completely self-righteous? Conspiracy theory much, Dave?
Give the girl a chance to defend herself. If she doesn't, she either doesn't give a shit what you think or she did what she's accused of...and the two possibilities are NOT mutually exclusive.
Originally Posted by Say What
Say What,
if you do not agree with my writing style or opinion, that is fine, but do not call me names. Obviously you do not know the difference between speaking highly of a provider and playing her WK, and it has nothing to do with self righteousness. I hope I did not use too many words between periods, since you seem to think I am looking for your approval of my posts.
Getting back on topic, macbeth1000 is pretty much spot on about Paige not rebuffing this alert, as I see it as a no win situation for her. People will speculate and theorize, but after this thread has hit page 2 and beyond, it will be out of site and out of mind. From what I have read of her reviews and the comments in them, IMO, Paige seems to be an extreme YMMV provider who no one actually knows what they are going to get with her. Too bad a guy cannot be YMMV on the donation he chooses to leave, depending on how she performs, if he could, the provider playing of the YMMV card would be obsolete.