I agree with the aboveGFE is sensual, sweet, and must have a easy going personality. I am a gfe but i dnt offer bbf at all and never will. Kissing and touching is what makes my engine rev! Im a proud GFE!! Its not for everyone, and if you arent dont say you are because youre wasting yours and the gentleman's time
I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT PROVIDE BBBJ, BBFS, LFK, DFK, or GREEK--from Remi's Showcase
Ok, I can understand no Greek, but to claim GFE and not offer LFK, DFK, or BBBJ is NOT GFE, it is barely provider experience. Not to offer anything and then post $350 an hour is a slap in the face to gentlemen everywhere Originally Posted by ncc72032
And she is upset about a claimed "fake" review that is positive. I can understand if it were negative, but bask in the glory of a positive review Originally Posted by ncc72032I beg to differ. I have one YES review that is a fake. But mods wont remove it. Many girls do not screen except to see if you have reviews. If a guy does a fake yes review and the girl assumes he is safe... well i dont want any part of what may happen if he isnt. Plus a guy shouldnt get PA access off a fake review.
GFE is sensual, sweet, and must have a easy going personality. I am a gfe but i dnt offer bbf at all and never will. Kissing and touching is what makes my engine rev! Im a proud GFE!! Its not for everyone, and if you arent dont say you are because youre wasting yours and the gentleman's time Originally Posted by London BridgeAgreed! OMG a good kisser! Someone that loves to kiss. My Fav sessions!
I beg to differ. I have one YES review that is a fake. But mods wont remove it. Many girls do not screen except to see if you have reviews. If a guy does a fake yes review and the girl assumes he is safe... well i dont want any part of what may happen if he isnt. Plus a guy shouldnt get PA access off a fake review.The Eccie Guidelines provide the following guidance on the subject of Fake Reviews:
anyway.. even a YES fake review should be removed. I think a girl that confronts it instead of using it to her advantage... is a pretty good chic Originally Posted by Devon Derriere
#24 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.To bring this thread back on track, both the Provider AND Reviewer have been in contact with the Moderator.
I suspect she was not aware what K9 is and g probably has another handle on p411. Or not. Originally Posted by Rockydoc